Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

Define "woman", then, please.

Any person who chooses to identify as a woman, IS a woman.


See how easy that was, trumpie? Blows your mind that it could be soooo simple, huh?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

Define "woman", then, please.

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

How so? It’s well-documented that many men are attracted to transwomen and it’s well-documented that many men are so confused and angry about this that they are hateful or even violent toward trans folks. There’s no way the minuscule number of trans athletes would have swayed an election without the intense emotions cisgendered men feel about the subject.

No it’s not and a patently absurd argument.

Sorry, I’m confused. What idea are you objecting to, exactly? That some men are attracted to trans folks? (It’s a huge online adult entertainment category). That some men feel angry or threatened by transwomen? (Um, have you ever MET a MAGA?) That phobic or insecure or bi-curious men sometimes rage against trans folks (this parallels the history of homophobia and the struggle for gay rights). That the clash between trans defenders on the left and transphobes on the right had some impact on the election due to cynical Republican messaging? (Have you ever MET a politician?). Or something else? I respect your opinion, I just realized that I wasn’t clear on what it is and I’d be interested to know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

How so? It’s well-documented that many men are attracted to transwomen and it’s well-documented that many men are so confused and angry about this that they are hateful or even violent toward trans folks. There’s no way the minuscule number of trans athletes would have swayed an election without the intense emotions cisgendered men feel about the subject.

No it’s not and a patently absurd argument.

Sorry, I’m confused. What idea are you objecting to, exactly? That some men are attracted to trans folks? (It’s a huge online adult entertainment category). That some men feel angry or threatened by transwomen? (Um, have you ever MET a MAGA?) That phobic or insecure or bi-curious men sometimes rage against trans folks (this parallels the history of homophobia and the struggle for gay rights). That the clash between trans defenders on the left and transphobes on the right had some impact on the election due to cynical Republican messaging? (Have you ever MET a politician?). Or something else? I respect your opinion, I just realized that I wasn’t clear on what it is and I’d be interested to know.

Anonymous wrote:We’re not backing down. We will ignore Republican attack ads. 45 Senate Democrats just blocked the hateful ban on trans athletes. Some principles are more important than winning elections. I hate what Trump is doing as much as anyone. But I will NOT throw transwomen under the bus just to save my 401k.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

They are NOT biological women. Just because you can outside in your penis does not make you a woman. Biological women should perform against other biological women. Period.

Anonymous wrote:Testes do not a man make, but
Lovely eyelashes make ladies, even if fake
Women with danglers, men with wombs
No wonder there’s chaos in the bathrooms

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

How so? It’s well-documented that many men are attracted to transwomen and it’s well-documented that many men are so confused and angry about this that they are hateful or even violent toward trans folks. There’s no way the minuscule number of trans athletes would have swayed an election without the intense emotions cisgendered men feel about the subject.

No it’s not and a patently absurd argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Anonymous wrote:We’re not backing down. We will ignore Republican attack ads. 45 Senate Democrats just blocked the hateful ban on trans athletes. Some principles are more important than winning elections. I hate what Trump is doing as much as anyone. But I will NOT throw transwomen under the bus just to save my 401k.