Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Thanks for the response- that is what I thought. Let’s say it’s two kids who have in-boundary preference, and one of them also has sibling preference. No other preferences for either kid and this is a DCPS school. The kid with sibling and in boundary preference should be admitted before kids with just in boundary preference is my understanding.
There are different buckets based on how a school does preference. In your example those two kids aren't even in the same bucket. This is all crystal clear. It is in no way a mystery. Take Maury as an example. The order of preference is:
1. In-boundary w Sibling Attending
2. In-boundary w Sibling Offered
3. In-boundary
4. Sibling Attending
5. Sibling Offered
6. Proximity
My School DC is run VERY well and their website and supporting info is quite good. Would suggest taking a few minutes to review, PP.
Based on your example a kid with in boundary cannot get in before a kid with in boundary sibling attending. Someone told me they were waitlisted but other kids who only had in boundary were admitted. Hence my question to this “crystal clear” situation. But thanks for the condescension.
"Someone told you" something that didn't happen. My condescension is a reaction to people who prioritize neighborhood scuttlebutt over facts. In a world and city where facts and science and data are being discounted I have no patience for it. What you were told did not happen as long as everyone's addresses were correct, no one matched at a school higher on their WL and no one qualified for equitable access. In the Maury example 3 IB kids were admitted from EA. Maybe you should confront the person "you heard" got in with only IB and demand to know their financial situation?
What happens a lot around lottery time is people who didn't get a match get bitter about what other people got.
The lottery data has been posted. What school was this? You can see for yourself the preferences that were and were not admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Thanks for the response- that is what I thought. Let’s say it’s two kids who have in-boundary preference, and one of them also has sibling preference. No other preferences for either kid and this is a DCPS school. The kid with sibling and in boundary preference should be admitted before kids with just in boundary preference is my understanding.
There are different buckets based on how a school does preference. In your example those two kids aren't even in the same bucket. This is all crystal clear. It is in no way a mystery. Take Maury as an example. The order of preference is:
1. In-boundary w Sibling Attending
2. In-boundary w Sibling Offered
3. In-boundary
4. Sibling Attending
5. Sibling Offered
6. Proximity
My School DC is run VERY well and their website and supporting info is quite good. Would suggest taking a few minutes to review, PP.
Based on your example a kid with in boundary cannot get in before a kid with in boundary sibling attending. Someone told me they were waitlisted but other kids who only had in boundary were admitted. Hence my question to this “crystal clear” situation. But thanks for the condescension.
"Someone told you" something that didn't happen. My condescension is a reaction to people who prioritize neighborhood scuttlebutt over facts. In a world and city where facts and science and data are being discounted I have no patience for it. What you were told did not happen as long as everyone's addresses were correct, no one matched at a school higher on their WL and no one qualified for equitable access. In the Maury example 3 IB kids were admitted from EA. Maybe you should confront the person "you heard" got in with only IB and demand to know their financial situation?
What happens a lot around lottery time is people who didn't get a match get bitter about what other people got.
The lottery data has been posted. What school was this? You can see for yourself the preferences that were and were not admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Thanks for the response- that is what I thought. Let’s say it’s two kids who have in-boundary preference, and one of them also has sibling preference. No other preferences for either kid and this is a DCPS school. The kid with sibling and in boundary preference should be admitted before kids with just in boundary preference is my understanding.
There are different buckets based on how a school does preference. In your example those two kids aren't even in the same bucket. This is all crystal clear. It is in no way a mystery. Take Maury as an example. The order of preference is:
1. In-boundary w Sibling Attending
2. In-boundary w Sibling Offered
3. In-boundary
4. Sibling Attending
5. Sibling Offered
6. Proximity
My School DC is run VERY well and their website and supporting info is quite good. Would suggest taking a few minutes to review, PP.
Based on your example a kid with in boundary cannot get in before a kid with in boundary sibling attending. Someone told me they were waitlisted but other kids who only had in boundary were admitted. Hence my question to this “crystal clear” situation. But thanks for the condescension.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Thanks for the response- that is what I thought. Let’s say it’s two kids who have in-boundary preference, and one of them also has sibling preference. No other preferences for either kid and this is a DCPS school. The kid with sibling and in boundary preference should be admitted before kids with just in boundary preference is my understanding.
There are different buckets based on how a school does preference. In your example those two kids aren't even in the same bucket. This is all crystal clear. It is in no way a mystery. Take Maury as an example. The order of preference is:
1. In-boundary w Sibling Attending
2. In-boundary w Sibling Offered
3. In-boundary
4. Sibling Attending
5. Sibling Offered
6. Proximity
My School DC is run VERY well and their website and supporting info is quite good. Would suggest taking a few minutes to review, PP.
Based on your example a kid with in boundary cannot get in before a kid with in boundary sibling attending. Someone told me they were waitlisted but other kids who only had in boundary were admitted. Hence my question to this “crystal clear” situation. But thanks for the condescension.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Thanks for the response- that is what I thought. Let’s say it’s two kids who have in-boundary preference, and one of them also has sibling preference. No other preferences for either kid and this is a DCPS school. The kid with sibling and in boundary preference should be admitted before kids with just in boundary preference is my understanding.
There are different buckets based on how a school does preference. In your example those two kids aren't even in the same bucket. This is all crystal clear. It is in no way a mystery. Take Maury as an example. The order of preference is:
1. In-boundary w Sibling Attending
2. In-boundary w Sibling Offered
3. In-boundary
4. Sibling Attending
5. Sibling Offered
6. Proximity
My School DC is run VERY well and their website and supporting info is quite good. Would suggest taking a few minutes to review, PP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Thanks for the response- that is what I thought. Let’s say it’s two kids who have in-boundary preference, and one of them also has sibling preference. No other preferences for either kid and this is a DCPS school. The kid with sibling and in boundary preference should be admitted before kids with just in boundary preference is my understanding.
Anonymous wrote:There is a special waitlist rule for siblings:
“After being matched an applicant will be placed on the waitlist for any school their sibling is matched to even if the school was ranked below where they are matched.”
https://www.myschooldc.org/how-waitlists-work
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
I don’t think that’s correct at all. You are not waitlisted at schools you ranked below your match, period. That’s why the number one rule of the lottery is to rank your choices in your true order of preference.
On the issue of whether a kid without sibling preference can get in over sibling preference - my understanding is that every school sets its own policy for priority groups - sibling, inbound, proximity, children of staff, etc. so the answer to that is depends on which school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
I believe if a kid with sibling preference ranks the school at which they have sibling preference, but matches at something they ranked higher, they will be waitlisted in the sibling category at the school where they have sibling preference. So a kid without sibling preference could match over them.
Sibling preference can be lost if the sibling leaves the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It looks like MacArthur is a clear easy post-lottery add for any 9th grader who didn't match
But why spend 2 hours round trip going all the way across town to a poorly performing title 1 school when you can just go to a similar one in your neighborhood that down the street or less then 10 minutes away?
Wow...
I mean… is the PP wrong? What is inherently better about MacArthur than the schools people are zoned for? The people trying to send their kids across town to MacA are the “racists” (scare quotes) not the poster merely pointing out that a school in ward 3 is not better just because it’s in ward 3.
Is this a serious question?
School, math 4+, English 4+
MacArthur, 11%, 40%
Eastern, 1%, 15%
Dunbar, 1%, 14%
Roosevelt, 0%, 12%
That’s why.
Sorry but that yield it not enough to subject my kid to a 2 hour plus commute in addition to having to supplement just to stay in the city.
But hey, you do you.
It was a good response to the question about why to choose it over your neighborhood school. If you'd move instead, that was not about you.
Anonymous wrote:Can a kid without sibling preference get into a school over a kid with sibling preference? I thought the answer was no but might be confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It looks like MacArthur is a clear easy post-lottery add for any 9th grader who didn't match
But why spend 2 hours round trip going all the way across town to a poorly performing title 1 school when you can just go to a similar one in your neighborhood that down the street or less then 10 minutes away?
Wow...
I mean… is the PP wrong? What is inherently better about MacArthur than the schools people are zoned for? The people trying to send their kids across town to MacA are the “racists” (scare quotes) not the poster merely pointing out that a school in ward 3 is not better just because it’s in ward 3.
Is this a serious question?
School, math 4+, English 4+
MacArthur, 11%, 40%
Eastern, 1%, 15%
Dunbar, 1%, 14%
Roosevelt, 0%, 12%
That’s why.
Sorry but that yield it not enough to subject my kid to a 2 hour plus commute in addition to having to supplement just to stay in the city.
But hey, you do you.