Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have the money why not double or triple deposit? Every school has a waitlist and they make money off of forfeited deposits
Why? Because living in limbo land sucks. Why is anyone encouraging or supporting their kid in dragging out a decision among current choices for another month (beyond May 1?). What is the benefit to your own kid?
My kid has 3 fantastic choices. We are doing revisits but I want this all settled by May. There is no way it's going to benefit her to have another month to live in limbo while all her friends are wearing their college gear, displaying their choice at grad parties, planning their rooms, etc.
How does it benefit my kid AT ALL to spend another month thinking, "huh, choice A or choice B?" It's not like she's going to get some additional info about the schools between May 1 and June XX. The current students will be gone for the summer. The campus will be empty, etc.
But not being able to decide in a month is wrong, and I'm not sure how your kid will function at college in the fall if they cannot.
What a bunch of BS. So my kid wont function in college because he failed to respond in 26 days? You live in laland. Go away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid for once was just admitted to an Ivy today. very weird, 1 week after Ivy day. we dont know what happened, but it did.. He didnt think he had a chance.
He needs more than 30 days to decide….I dont care if you dont like it or dont understand why. But it is what it is.
Well it's unethical. As well as sad that your kid cannot decide in 30 days. You take your top choices, then re-evaluate and make a decision. Also visit the top 3-4 (if you can afford it), to help with the process. But a kid qualified to gain admission to an Ivy should be capable of making a decision
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have the money why not double or triple deposit? Every school has a waitlist and they make money off of forfeited deposits
Why? Because living in limbo land sucks. Why is anyone encouraging or supporting their kid in dragging out a decision among current choices for another month (beyond May 1?). What is the benefit to your own kid?
My kid has 3 fantastic choices. We are doing revisits but I want this all settled by May. There is no way it's going to benefit her to have another month to live in limbo while all her friends are wearing their college gear, displaying their choice at grad parties, planning their rooms, etc.
How does it benefit my kid AT ALL to spend another month thinking, "huh, choice A or choice B?" It's not like she's going to get some additional info about the schools between May 1 and June XX. The current students will be gone for the summer. The campus will be empty, etc.
Maybe a kid wants to visit campuses during spring break before they make a final decision. Who cares? They have their reasons ok? You are being too dramatic about living in limbo. Sit in that discomfort in not knowing because the feeling of knowing is a fallacy. Maybe use that month to volunteer in a soup kitchen.
Anonymous wrote:My kid for once was just admitted to an Ivy today. very weird, 1 week after Ivy day. we dont know what happened, but it did.. He didnt think he had a chance.
He needs more than 30 days to decide….I dont care if you dont like it or dont understand why. But it is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:I guess. Although there is a mechanism for consequences for doing so and they are choosing to take that risk. I’m on the fence if that is unethical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have the money why not double or triple deposit? Every school has a waitlist and they make money off of forfeited deposits
Why? Because living in limbo land sucks. Why is anyone encouraging or supporting their kid in dragging out a decision among current choices for another month (beyond May 1?). What is the benefit to your own kid?
My kid has 3 fantastic choices. We are doing revisits but I want this all settled by May. There is no way it's going to benefit her to have another month to live in limbo while all her friends are wearing their college gear, displaying their choice at grad parties, planning their rooms, etc.
How does it benefit my kid AT ALL to spend another month thinking, "huh, choice A or choice B?" It's not like she's going to get some additional info about the schools between May 1 and June XX. The current students will be gone for the summer. The campus will be empty, etc.
Maybe a kid wants to visit campuses during spring break before they make a final decision. Who cares? They have their reasons ok? You are being too dramatic about living in limbo. Sit in that discomfort in not knowing because the feeling of knowing is a fallacy. Maybe use that month to volunteer in a soup kitchen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have the money why not double or triple deposit? Every school has a waitlist and they make money off of forfeited deposits
Why? Because living in limbo land sucks. Why is anyone encouraging or supporting their kid in dragging out a decision among current choices for another month (beyond May 1?). What is the benefit to your own kid?
My kid has 3 fantastic choices. We are doing revisits but I want this all settled by May. There is no way it's going to benefit her to have another month to live in limbo while all her friends are wearing their college gear, displaying their choice at grad parties, planning their rooms, etc.
How does it benefit my kid AT ALL to spend another month thinking, "huh, choice A or choice B?" It's not like she's going to get some additional info about the schools between May 1 and June XX. The current students will be gone for the summer. The campus will be empty, etc.
Anonymous wrote:My kid for once was just admitted to an Ivy today. very weird, 1 week after Ivy day. we dont know what happened, but it did.. He didnt think he had a chance.
He needs more than 30 days to decide….I dont care if you dont like it or dont understand why. But it is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:If you have the money why not double or triple deposit? Every school has a waitlist and they make money off of forfeited deposits
Anonymous wrote:HS Counselors and consultants have an obligation to scare you when it comes to double depositing…..but the reality is that it is NOT illegal. And IF a university dares to rescind admission to a student who double deposited they would be sued so fast that the amount of money they would spend on litigation would be the equivalent of giving away 100% merit awards to more than 100 kids…
From another website: “Andrew Flagel, former SVP for Students and Enrollment at Brandeis University, once suggested to his colleagues:
“I really like when the argument gets all fired up as a debate on ethics. It seems particularly charming that the same universities that are sending massively manipulative marketing materials (oh how I love alliteration) and providing entirely opaque information on scholarship and financial aid policies [that] they manipulate behind the scenes, then call students unethical for not being able to make up their minds by May 1…. I know I’ll catch a lot (A LOT) of flack for this, but it isn’t unethical, it’s a purchasing decision (let the flack begin!). You can place deposits on any number of items (say a car, just to draw the comparison most likely to inflame my colleagues) and decide NOT to make that purchase without being in the least unethical, can’t you?”
Anonymous wrote:I guess. Although there is a mechanism for consequences for doing so and they are choosing to take that risk. I’m on the fence if that is unethical.