Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:just fill it out mutliple times indicating middle schooler and that's its too early. All school at all levels should only be between the hours of 8am-4pm that is normal.
Your "normal" is simply unaffordable and unrealistic.
It is realistic and affordable if they prioritize it. If they actually think of other solutions like opting in for bus, changing mileage that requires bus usage, etc.
Have you seen the county budget shortfall? You are not being realistic if you expect Fairfax to blow the budget on hundreds more buses and drivers. Use some common sense.
It's not a budget shortfall. They are getting more money than last year. They are just trying to spend even more than that, and threatening to take away things people like to garner sympathy. They have positions they can cut (and should cut so as not to lose federal funding due to the DEI executive order). They are choosing not to.
Anonymous wrote:What a ridiculous survey to being paying third party for. Are you happy with start time in ES? If answer yes, so what? The fact they didn’t pay for a follow up question to be asked to survey what time would prefer if could pick time is bizarre- guess they didn’t want any record of that. I am also guessing the majority of people that complete these surveys are not the ones dependent on their kids for childcare so those results will be skewed too. So odd.
Anonymous wrote:What a ridiculous survey to being paying third party for. Are you happy with start time in ES? If answer yes, so what? The fact they didn’t pay for a follow up question to be asked to survey what time would prefer if could pick time is bizarre- guess they didn’t want any record of that. I am also guessing the majority of people that complete these surveys are not the ones dependent on their kids for childcare so those results will be skewed too. So odd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The survey is serving its intended purpose: to obtain data that will be used to justify boundary changes based on “proximity” to “meet parents’ concerns over start times.”
It is a weird survey because it is intended to obtain data that will be used to support a “decision” that is unrelated purported purpose of the survey.
You only think they “never use the surveys”. Oh they use them. That’s why they employ all those data folks. They just don’t use them to obtain actual public input in good faith. Just wait until the boundary review surveys hit your inbox in late summer.
+1 although I didn’t make broader connection to boundary changes. I got the impression they were collecting data to support their position that high schoolers need to start earlier so they can be home first to babysit younger sibs and/or get to jobs. Maybe they want to switch middle and high school start times?
If they "use" the surveys like PP claimed, then why wasn't there survey data to back up their unpopular calendar changes? The only use of those surveys they made was "well we can't make everyone happy." They weren't able to massage that data to support their preferred calendar. I can't imagine they will be able to massage start time survey data or boundary survey data either.
There probably was and it went entirely against what FCPS did- much like other times when the parent surveys overwhelming sat one thing and then superintendent says as she is on record for saying multiple times “the majority doesn’t always get its way.” Input will be collected but disregarded as needed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The survey is serving its intended purpose: to obtain data that will be used to justify boundary changes based on “proximity” to “meet parents’ concerns over start times.”
It is a weird survey because it is intended to obtain data that will be used to support a “decision” that is unrelated purported purpose of the survey.
You only think they “never use the surveys”. Oh they use them. That’s why they employ all those data folks. They just don’t use them to obtain actual public input in good faith. Just wait until the boundary review surveys hit your inbox in late summer.
+1 although I didn’t make broader connection to boundary changes. I got the impression they were collecting data to support their position that high schoolers need to start earlier so they can be home first to babysit younger sibs and/or get to jobs. Maybe they want to switch middle and high school start times?
If they "use" the surveys like PP claimed, then why wasn't there survey data to back up their unpopular calendar changes? The only use of those surveys they made was "well we can't make everyone happy." They weren't able to massage that data to support their preferred calendar. I can't imagine they will be able to massage start time survey data or boundary survey data either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The survey is serving its intended purpose: to obtain data that will be used to justify boundary changes based on “proximity” to “meet parents’ concerns over start times.”
It is a weird survey because it is intended to obtain data that will be used to support a “decision” that is unrelated purported purpose of the survey.
You only think they “never use the surveys”. Oh they use them. That’s why they employ all those data folks. They just don’t use them to obtain actual public input in good faith. Just wait until the boundary review surveys hit your inbox in late summer.
+1 although I didn’t make broader connection to boundary changes. I got the impression they were collecting data to support their position that high schoolers need to start earlier so they can be home first to babysit younger sibs and/or get to jobs. Maybe they want to switch middle and high school start times?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The survey is serving its intended purpose: to obtain data that will be used to justify boundary changes based on “proximity” to “meet parents’ concerns over start times.”
It is a weird survey because it is intended to obtain data that will be used to support a “decision” that is unrelated purported purpose of the survey.
You only think they “never use the surveys”. Oh they use them. That’s why they employ all those data folks. They just don’t use them to obtain actual public input in good faith. Just wait until the boundary review surveys hit your inbox in late summer.
+1 although I didn’t make broader connection to boundary changes. I got the impression they were collecting data to support their position that high schoolers need to start earlier so they can be home first to babysit younger sibs and/or get to jobs. Maybe they want to switch middle and high school start times?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The survey is serving its intended purpose: to obtain data that will be used to justify boundary changes based on “proximity” to “meet parents’ concerns over start times.”
It is a weird survey because it is intended to obtain data that will be used to support a “decision” that is unrelated purported purpose of the survey.
You only think they “never use the surveys”. Oh they use them. That’s why they employ all those data folks. They just don’t use them to obtain actual public input in good faith. Just wait until the boundary review surveys hit your inbox in late summer.
+1 although I didn’t make broader connection to boundary changes. I got the impression they were collecting data to support their position that high schoolers need to start earlier so they can be home first to babysit younger sibs and/or get to jobs. Maybe they want to switch middle and high school start times?
Anonymous wrote:The survey is serving its intended purpose: to obtain data that will be used to justify boundary changes based on “proximity” to “meet parents’ concerns over start times.”
It is a weird survey because it is intended to obtain data that will be used to support a “decision” that is unrelated purported purpose of the survey.
You only think they “never use the surveys”. Oh they use them. That’s why they employ all those data folks. They just don’t use them to obtain actual public input in good faith. Just wait until the boundary review surveys hit your inbox in late summer.