Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:United We Fight
One Fight: Your Rights

Democrats don’t care very much about rights. That’s not a winner. Too much water under the bridge at this point.

United We Fight might work.

I like United We Fight because it allows for the conglomerate of variety to fit in a show of solidarity in fighting together. It is intentionally simplified. It acknowledges the dissension that can occur with different opinions amidst change, yet encourages focus on the power of everyone agreeing to take action uniquely in their fight.

R.A.D.D.: “Republicans, Admire Democrats Damnit!”

Anonymous wrote:MAMA!

Make America Meaningful Again!

No, no...

Make Americans Matter Again!

MAMA!

Make America Meaningful Again!

“Bow Down to the Coastal Laptop Class”

PAPA!!

Prioritize American People Again!!!

“Some Pigs Are More Equal Than Others”

“Blue City Folks Good, Flyover State Folks Bad”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. So far the taglines seem to be:

“We are still right even though you didn’t vote for us!”
“We think you are stupid for not seeing how right we are!”

So, yes, room to improve.

Well, many are starting to realize what you wrote is in fact true.

Everyone realizes it except the Democrats doing it. Most of this website is posts insisting that Americans are stupid for not worshipping dcurbanmom types. I’m not seeing much humility from the minority party. Democrats have a lot further to fall before they’ll accept the need to change. I expect more election losses for Dems in the years to come.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We lost the election because we suck at messaging.

So let’s workshop the call to action through catchy messaging suitable for t-shirts, car magnets, tote bags, etc. If we can fit it on a lapel pin, even better.

What’s the logo?

What’s our counter to the red maga hat?

It needs to be positive. We need to fight back, but we need to foster hope.

Next: what will it take for opposition leaders to galvanize a groundswell of support that sparks real action?

And who are these leaders?

I think we need fresh faces with high energy. Fighters who can not only bring facts, but can throw out Tik Tok worthy zingers that reach and resonate with the masses.

We can do this, Dcumlandia!

Did Dems lose....or did Elon buy an election?

THIS

“We are the election deniers now”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "tagline for the opposition" is: "we didn't listen to your concerns, and we were arrogant enough to think that we can force a joke of a candidate down your throats. And now we are doubling down on this, claiming that you didn't vote for her because you are misogynistic racists."

Nah. People like you are the joke. When are you people going to hurry up and drink your Jim jones koolaid.

Dems refuse to abandon their unpopular policies, preferring instead to fantasize about mass voter suicide.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We lost the election because we suck at messaging.

So let’s workshop the call to action through catchy messaging suitable for t-shirts, car magnets, tote bags, etc. If we can fit it on a lapel pin, even better.

What’s the logo?

What’s our counter to the red maga hat?

It needs to be positive. We need to fight back, but we need to foster hope.

Next: what will it take for opposition leaders to galvanize a groundswell of support that sparks real action?

And who are these leaders?

I think we need fresh faces with high energy. Fighters who can not only bring facts, but can throw out Tik Tok worthy zingers that reach and resonate with the masses.

We can do this, Dcumlandia!

Did Dems lose....or did Elon buy an election?

THIS

Anonymous wrote:NP. So far the taglines seem to be:

“We are still right even though you didn’t vote for us!”
“We think you are stupid for not seeing how right we are!”

So, yes, room to improve.

Well, many are starting to realize what you wrote is in fact true.

Anonymous wrote:The "tagline for the opposition" is: "we didn't listen to your concerns, and we were arrogant enough to think that we can force a joke of a candidate down your throats. And now we are doubling down on this, claiming that you didn't vote for her because you are misogynistic racists."

Nah. People like you are the joke. When are you people going to hurry up and drink your Jim jones koolaid.

Anonymous wrote:Actually, I read another MAGA-focusing thread further down, and realize that as government programs get destroyed, we have a chance of shifting things from a FOX-induced culture war to a mutually beneficial class war. TAX THE RICH.


Most people have no idea what the tax rates were pre-Reagan. Most people also give little thought to the infrastructure and natural resources that disproportionately benefit corporations— while being disproportionately funded by individuals paying federal, state, and local taxes, sales taxes, and even tolls. TAX THE RICH.


Maybe there is one out there already, but a public gathering with AOC, Bernie Sanders, Warren Buffet…. as our public institutions crumble would attract a lot of support, and represent a lot of potential power.

Prior to the 1986 tax reform, individuals could deduct a lot of living and investment expenses. So while the tax rates were higher, the tax base (i.e., gross income less deductions) was lower. The 1986 changes eliminated a lot of gamesmanship by eliminating individual deductions and reducing the rate. The rich would absolutely NOT care if you raise the rates back to pre-Reagan era tax rates IF you also give them back their deductions.

Also, US tax policy is a mess because its the only financial tool the US has / uses to advance a whole host of fiscal policies. Two points you might want to consider: (1) do you want to incentivize foreign-investment in the US and, if so, how will you do that, (2) do you want to incentivize investment in assets located in the US (e.g., plants & machinery) and, if so, how will you do that, (3) do you want to incentivize employment of individuals within the US and, if so, how will you do that, and (4) do you want to the US to compete globally to retain high-net worth individuals and their assets in the US and, if so, how will you do that? In a world where the rich can move to the UK or Singapore or Canada or wherever gives them a good deal, how does you tax policy prevent capital flight?