Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I'm not "fussing at the teacher." I actually think she is amazing in so many ways. I think she has a tool in her classroom that does a lot more harm than good.
You flat out dismiss my concerns as lies from a child. That's gross, and false.
DP. Screens are here to stay. How can it be minimized or used effectively in schools? Teachers are trying various methods. Try limiting screens at home. Encourage your school PTA and school leaders to hold meetings (or via another method) to present to adults/families of the students understand negative effects of screens and to help their kids limit screens at home.
Anonymous wrote:Btw I'm not "fussing at the teacher." I actually think she is amazing in so many ways. I think she has a tool in her classroom that does a lot more harm than good.
You flat out dismiss my concerns as lies from a child. That's gross, and false.
Anonymous wrote:OP, have you actually talked to your childs teacher about this to get informed on how often the smart board was being used and in what capacity? Your child reported watching a book on it one time. That does not mean that every book is read from the smart board. I am a teacher within PGCPS and the smart boards are rarely used although every classroom has one. They are quite unreliable (wifi and the smart board itself breaking down) and it takes teachers a lot of time, which they do not have, to convert whatever the paper based curriculum has to a the smart board. Honestly, as a teacher, we cannot get rid of them. Reach out to the principal and or the school board to petition to get rid of them. I would much rather have physical manipulatives, textbooks for every child, etc than a smart board. You all, as parents, have so much power but the only thing you do is fuss at the teacher. It is being directed at the wrong people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I imagine the money for the boxlights may have come from federal funds and therefore didn't detract, necessarily, from the general accounts. But, beyond that, paper simply has been expensive for some time now and is an on-going consumerable. If anything MCPS needs to train staff on proper print jobs, whether sending to CopyPlus or knowing better to send a b/w job to a color laser printer. (IYKYK.)
It's all taxpayer funding. Taxpayers are paying enough money for books but that money is being used for screens to show YouTube videos instead
You know what is also expensive? Software. Hardware. And all the tech people that are required to maintain it. Makes paper look cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I imagine the money for the boxlights may have come from federal funds and therefore didn't detract, necessarily, from the general accounts. But, beyond that, paper simply has been expensive for some time now and is an on-going consumerable. If anything MCPS needs to train staff on proper print jobs, whether sending to CopyPlus or knowing better to send a b/w job to a color laser printer. (IYKYK.)
It's all taxpayer funding. Taxpayers are paying enough money for books but that money is being used for screens to show YouTube videos instead
Anonymous wrote:Not in MC but I teach kindergarten in another MD. Most of our assessments are one-on-one. Last week I gave a math assessment one-on-one and I had the kids watch maybe five St. Patrick’s Day books on YouTube. This week is progress monitoring one-on-one. That means a few more books. Maybe about spring. Almost every 2-3 weeks I have to stop teaching to give assessments one-on-one. I have a para for 45 minutes at the end of the day. That’s it. There are only so many things the kids can do where they are quiet.
Anonymous wrote:I've seen the boards used in really innovative ways in early elementary, including for math games that allow kinetic learners to engage physically with the screen.
Like any tool, there are good and bad ways to use it, but OP's entire diatribe seems to be based on the word of a kid younger than 8, and without any of the context for why a teacher might need the kids to stay busy for 15 minutes.