Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
Irregardless isn’t a word.
Not exactly according to Webster. It is a word and has been used less in writing but more in prose. It recommends using regardless in its place, but you are not correct that it isn't a word. It is an irregular word.
I'm not the person who used it initially.
Irregardless isn’t a word. Want to look stupid? Use it as much as you like.
I think you actually look stupid. They even have a name for people like you. You can read all about it here Bluto: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/is-irregardless-a-real-word-heh-heh
Ah, irregardless—the linguistic equivalent of wearing socks with sandals. Technically, yes, it is a word. It has been used for over a century and even appears in dictionaries. However, it is widely regarded as nonstandard because the prefix ir- and the suffix -less create a double negative, making it redundant.
The preferred term is simply regardless. Using irregardless might raise some eyebrows, particularly among grammar purists.
Anonymous wrote:Getting back on track here.
My player is moving to ARL from another club. They ran a solid ID process, coaches were communicative, player got clear view into how they fit with team. Overall miles better than other local clubs. Club seems to have their act together. Seems to be the only stable club in the area that has solid college results and isn’t changing leagues, forming random alliances or changing everything around each season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
Irregardless isn’t a word.
Not exactly according to Webster. It is a word and has been used less in writing but more in prose. It recommends using regardless in its place, but you are not correct that it isn't a word. It is an irregular word.
I'm not the person who used it initially.
Irregardless isn’t a word. Want to look stupid? Use it as much as you like.
I think you actually look stupid. They even have a name for people like you. You can read all about it here Bluto: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/is-irregardless-a-real-word-heh-heh
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
Irregardless isn’t a word.
Not exactly according to Webster. It is a word and has been used less in writing but more in prose. It recommends using regardless in its place, but you are not correct that it isn't a word. It is an irregular word.
I'm not the person who used it initially.
Irregardless isn’t a word. Want to look stupid? Use it as much as you like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
Irregardless isn’t a word.
Not exactly according to Webster. It is a word and has been used less in writing but more in prose. It recommends using regardless in its place, but you are not correct that it isn't a word. It is an irregular word.
I'm not the person who used it initially.
and thats why everyone hates arlington parents.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
Irregardless isn’t a word.
Not exactly according to Webster. It is a word and has been used less in writing but more in prose. It recommends using regardless in its place, but you are not correct that it isn't a word. It is an irregular word.
I'm not the person who used it initially.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
Irregardless isn’t a word.
going to be even funnier when Arlington pulls a fast one next seasonAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What people don’t realize is NVA was solicited by MLSNext to expand into the NOVA market last year.
Bwaahahaha. Try something like “after they were rebuffed by Arlington, they were solicited by MLSNext…”
VDA is actually anti HS. So most dont make a majority of games. Maybe one coach doesnt punish them for itAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.
VDA allows their boys to play high school and wouldn’t want to shake that. ML also involved with ECNL. A for effort though.
Anonymous wrote: VDA will go before Arlington because they want their boys in MLSN and on the girls side BP was at a GA club before anyway and will still have his marketing machine irregardless of league.