Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 17:47     Subject: Banned words

Can you provide a cite OP?
I don’t believe that female (s) are on the list I can not believe that particular word is no longer accepted
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 10:01     Subject: Banned words

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess “special needs” is out

And “mongoloid” is back in ?

No it’s the r word. All the rage these days.


It will last For two seconds. In french it just means behind or late
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 08:28     Subject: Banned words

Anonymous wrote:So I guess “special needs” is out

And “mongoloid” is back in ?

No it’s the r word. All the rage these days.
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 05:16     Subject: Banned words

I am not insulting the people.
I am just saying that China is really good at overseeing science.

China is also great at overseeing and guiding art. In the early 2000s in China, I was relaxing in my room watching tv. An entire scene (Meg Ryan at a restaurant with Billy Crystal) was muted on my television screen. You can only do that with some government creativity and limiting options

Science need to be carefully monitored. The scientists are to blame. Ballet is super shady too. Those fitted clothes lead to the banned word concepts above.
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 05:06     Subject: Banned words

Chinese researchers will not question.
Bring them in to perform the studies
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 05:04     Subject: Banned words

i’m not a scientist btw; just opinionated and deeply proud American woman.
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 05:03     Subject: Banned words

If you want to get mad PP, look at Musks plan to bring in foreign workers for american industry, rather than invest in students for ~five years.

Look at universities graduate and phd programs and read up. That will give you some trends to think about
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 04:56     Subject: Re:Banned words

Anonymous wrote:Without a citation, this is nothing more than a list of things mediocre white dudes are afraid of.


This makes sense. It makes sense not to trust American science and ingenuity to self police at this time

Musk can do it better. America has done poorly in science and innovation in the past. Bad track record. It’s government has spurred hardly any good technologies and Industry has not benefited from government
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 04:49     Subject: Banned words

Just use the word “SURVIVOR”

it’s not on the no-no list of bad science words
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 04:45     Subject: Banned words

Anonymous wrote:How is this OK? This is throwing the baby out with the bath water. What is the value in shutting down speech? We can't say "victim" anymore. Women?? That's wrong? "Mental health" is banned from our work if we're federally funded? (Shows they never gave a crap about mental health, even though they claimed to). What in the blazing hell is going on, and Congress, who appropriated these funds to work on, say, women with disabilities who have been victims of crime needing accessible services, is sitting there with their thumbs up their a$$es.

Here's the list of banned words you can't use in federally funded programming anymore:
accessible
activism
activists
advocacy
advocate
advocates
affirming care
all-inclusive
allyship
anti-racism
antiracist
assigned at birth
assigned female at birth
assigned male at birth
at risk
barrier
barriers
belong
bias
biased
biased toward
biases
biases towards
biologically female
biologically male
BIPOC
Black
breastfeed + people
breastfeed + person
chestfeed + people
chestfeed + person
clean energy
climate crisis
climate science
commercial sex worker
community diversity
community equity
confirmation bias
cultural competence
cultural differences
cultural heritage
cultural sensitivity
culturally appropriate
culturally responsive
DEI
DEIA
DEIAB
DEIJ
disabilities
disability
discriminated
discrimination
discriminatory
disparity
diverse
diverse backgrounds
diverse communities
diverse community
diverse group
diverse groups
diversified
diversify
diversifying
diversity
enhance the diversity
enhancing diversity
environmental quality
equal opportunity
equality
equitable
equitableness
equity
ethnicity
excluded
exclusion
expression
female
females
feminism
fostering inclusivity
GBV
gender
gender based
gender based violence
gender diversity
gender identity
gender ideology
gender-affirming care
genders
Gulf of Mexico
hate speech
health disparity
health equity
hispanic minority
historically
identity
immigrants
implicit bias
implicit biases
inclusion
inclusive
inclusive leadership
inclusiveness
inclusivity
increase diversity
increase the diversity
indigenous community
inequalities
inequality
inequitable
inequities
inequity
injustice
institutional
intersectional
intersectionality
key groups
key people
key populations
Latinx
LGBT
LGBTQ
marginalize
marginalized
men who have sex with men
mental health
minorities
minority
most risk
MSM
multicultural
Mx
Native American
non-binary
nonbinary
oppression
oppression
oppressive
orientation
people + uterus
people-centered care
person-centered
person-centered care
polarization
political
pollution
pregnant people
pregnant person
pregnant persons
prejudice
privilege
privileges
promote diversity
promoting diversity
pronoun
pronouns
prostitute
race
race and ethnicity
racial
racial diversity
racial identity
racial inequality
racial justice
racially
racism
segregation
sense of belonging
sex
sexual preferences
sexuality
social justice
sociocultural
socioeconomic
status
stereotype
stereotypes
systemic
systemically
they/them
trans
transgender
transsexual
trauma
traumatic
tribal
unconscious bias
underappreciated
underprivileged
underrepresentation
underrepresented
underserved
undervalued
victim
victims
vulnerable populations
women
women and underrepresented


Throw out the baby is their motto. It’s an AI based approach.

Don’t throw anything, but I do think the research of say, the Harvard President… was stupid. Those topics! I was surprised that social science research allowed her to rise to such venerated position. Clearly she didn’t last long (btw, ever notice many women ceos and police commissioners also don’t last long? Our culture doesn’t stick by female leaders.)

Anyhow, IMO this is about protecting religion and religious freedoms. The president s driving the country back. That was his slogan. Many many support this.

Some of these topics were previously funded or promoted — am I correct? This is a blunt reversal of that. The ironic thing is that you won’t be able to study the trans youth phenomena to explain it in a larger context. Oh well.
You are now under a microscope because of our extreme government (sorry for the pun).

As an aside, Study this amazing period of extremism! Just don’t use the word “advocacy” LOL *Sad face emoji (?). You all will be fine. I read the stuff cited in articles!
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 04:19     Subject: Banned words

Get reading to fight with AI and ready to fill out the exception forms to perform your misunderstood research?
Anonymous
Post 03/12/2025 04:18     Subject: Banned words

This must be part of the executive order praising free speech issued in early February
whitehouse . gov
Anonymous
Post 03/10/2025 23:15     Subject: Banned words

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These words are not banned. Thy are a list of words that will be flagged in any government content. In many cases the words can stay. In some cases they suggest using other words. And some of the content may be removed completely.

So once again, this is NOT a list of banned words.

Is it possible to post actual facts with out all the ridiculous hyperbole?


WtF!

Why so these words need to be flagged at all, dimwit?


Because if there is the word FEMALE in say some research being done at NIH, they want to make sure it's not associated with trans research. Cases like that.

Do you not understand what the word "banned" means? And you're calling me a dimwit?


DP... They canceled research involving transgenic mice because they thought it was about "transgender" mice. That's as banned as it gets. That's as dimwit as it gets.

It's cringeworthy that anyone is trying to defend any of this.


They canceled the research or flagged it? If you have a link to them canceling it I'd love to see it.


NP here. Google is your friend:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/doge-says-seven-grants-trans-210707259.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHjMZlAojhhXZu1iAqAwERCrq4GUbWg-V1a7cg84BlFOqgE8rNEwnohr7aFzPe7SHHA1CIO0SYPClo7HCycOCR1P_dONuZY8xYK9x0g__AgUpgMyidIducwMs8_U54hEPP7_Z5O8ZooiTCe09EoGHAPDW_yVuRPb7GG_cIUPcxIx



This article explains it more throughly:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2025/03/07/this-is-whats-behind-the-uproar-over-transgenic-mice/


They only canceled research using transgenic mice if it was investigating the effects of transgender hormones. Other research using transgenic mice is not being stopped (cancer, asthma, etc). The first article talks specifically about studies looking at the effects of gender transitions using transgender mice.





They’ve just wiped out the funding for the medical research, not banned it.
Anonymous
Post 03/10/2025 22:59     Subject: Banned words

Fascism.
Anonymous
Post 03/10/2025 22:58     Subject: Banned words

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These words are not banned. Thy are a list of words that will be flagged in any government content. In many cases the words can stay. In some cases they suggest using other words. And some of the content may be removed completely.

So once again, this is NOT a list of banned words.

Is it possible to post actual facts with out all the ridiculous hyperbole?


WtF!

Why so these words need to be flagged at all, dimwit?


Because if there is the word FEMALE in say some research being done at NIH, they want to make sure it's not associated with trans research. Cases like that.

Do you not understand what the word "banned" means? And you're calling me a dimwit?


DP... They canceled research involving transgenic mice because they thought it was about "transgender" mice. That's as banned as it gets. That's as dimwit as it gets.

It's cringeworthy that anyone is trying to defend any of this.


They canceled the research or flagged it? If you have a link to them canceling it I'd love to see it.


NP here. Google is your friend:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/doge-says-seven-grants-trans-210707259.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHjMZlAojhhXZu1iAqAwERCrq4GUbWg-V1a7cg84BlFOqgE8rNEwnohr7aFzPe7SHHA1CIO0SYPClo7HCycOCR1P_dONuZY8xYK9x0g__AgUpgMyidIducwMs8_U54hEPP7_Z5O8ZooiTCe09EoGHAPDW_yVuRPb7GG_cIUPcxIx



This article explains it more throughly:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2025/03/07/this-is-whats-behind-the-uproar-over-transgenic-mice/


They only canceled research using transgenic mice if it was investigating the effects of transgender hormones. Other research using transgenic mice is not being stopped (cancer, asthma, etc). The first article talks specifically about studies looking at the effects of gender transitions using transgender mice.




Fake news. Team Trump canceled it and genuinely had no f'ing clue what they were canceling. STOP MAKING EXCUSES FOR WHITE HOUSE IDIOTS.