Anonymous wrote:We did plan well, we thought. DH worked his entire career for the same company and had a very good defined benefit pension plan funded by payroll deductions and company contributions. Company bankruptcy wiped out the pension plan so we’re left with a fraction of what we expected. How were we to prepare for that?
Social security (along with savings)is important for us to not need any future help from our adult children.
Anonymous wrote:No, I'm worried about myself not getting social security which I've paid into and Boomers have stolen.
Anonymous wrote:No, I'm worried about myself not getting social security which I've paid into and Boomers have stolen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope. Not the least bit concerned. They have pensions and savings and never really relied on SS to begin with. The same for DH and I. We don’t include it in any financial planning.
Well, la di da
Well you asked. Sorry you didnt plan better.
Where are their pensions from?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not worried at all because my parents are still alive.
Constant fear mongering is getting tiresome.
Perhaps you need to spend time reading all the the executive orders and presidential memos.
So you spend all your time doom scrolling and felt like adding to the confusion and anxiety?
Anonymous wrote:In case Musk takes away social security, I've been doing some financial planning for my remaining parent.
The lack of social security will make things very tight. It really angers me that the money my parent made will likely be stolen by billionaires.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope. Not the least bit concerned. They have pensions and savings and never really relied on SS to begin with. The same for DH and I. We don’t include it in any financial planning.
Well, la di da
Well you asked. Sorry you didnt plan better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm worried about myself not getting social security which I've paid into and Boomers have stolen.
That's mistake #1 assuming it was going to be there for you in the first place.
Fine, but that is not Trump and Musk's decision.
Let the chicken livered Congressmen put their name down as the ones who killed Social Security.
Whether you think SS should be reduced/changed, the way in which it is being done it wrong. That is the key. So don't just keel over and say oh well I knew it wasn't going to be there. They are ROBBING from you through unorthodox channels. That is the issue.
I assumed we wouldn't be getting it way before Trump took office.
Wise decision
Is there anything else you didn't think you were getting? Like Freedom of Speech, ACA, being told if there is an outbreak near you, tornado or hurricane warnings, not having sewage in your drinking water.
That way you will be prepared not to be disappointed
This thread is about social security. Take it on over to politics for the fight you so desperately seem to want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope. Not the least bit concerned. They have pensions and savings and never really relied on SS to begin with. The same for DH and I. We don’t include it in any financial planning.
For many, their savings is way down since the stock market is tanking due to Trump.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1261332.page
The Dow Jones is up compared to six months ago. That’s hardly “tanking”.
How about since he took office?
We don't care. Of course there's going to be some market volatility with big changes/reductions in government. It's necessary and long overdue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG the ignorance. It is not a ponzi scheme as it is government regulated by payroll and has an insured input of $$ as long as it is administered well (and yes that does include rooting out fraud- but last I heard, firing employees won't help with any of that).
SS has a huge legacy of trust associated with it. To remove the trust that those who contributed to it and planned for it and now rely on it is truly 'banana republic'
Agree it's not a ponzi scheme, but it was never marketed correctly to the general public (at least not in recent memory).
Your contributions don't pay for your SS...your contributions pay for current retirees and the system anticipated each generation of workers being larger than the current generation of retirees and much lower life expectancy.
Think about it...how much $$$s did the first SS recipients contribute to the system? If you answered $0, you would be correct.
I was listening to a radio story, and unless something changes (raise the minimum retirement age, raise the amount of $$$s that can be taxed, raise the tax rate, etc.) then SS benefits will automatically have to be cut by like 21% in 6-7 years based on how the system currently works.
You do not sound informed. All they have to do is remove the cap.