Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No more FAFSA, so good luck getting aid.
That authority would move back to the Treasury Department.
Also closing DOE entirely would require a supermajority of 60 senators, meaning some Dems would need to join all the Reps, which is unlikely to happen.
+1. All 47 Dems + Collins + Murkowski + McConnell + one extra GOP Senator would be enough to keep DoED alive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does DOE even do? Just because it exists doesn't mean it should exist forever. Where's the value add?
There has been no marked increase in test scores/educational achievement at the K-12 level since DOE was establish in 1980, so the money hasn't helped there.
For all we know it has helped them not to collapse completely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does DOE even do? Just because it exists doesn't mean it should exist forever. Where's the value add?
There has been no marked increase in test scores/educational achievement at the K-12 level since DOE was establish in 1980, so the money hasn't helped there.
Anonymous wrote:What does DOE even do? Just because it exists doesn't mean it should exist forever. Where's the value add?
Anonymous wrote:I'm a former ED official. The ED has always been a bloated, useless agency (Thanks, Carter). What you don't understand is that when the agency was created, every useless staffer or lawyer in other agencies were sent to ED, which is how I ended up managing over 100 staff and lawyers much later. I can't begin to tell you how dysfunctional they were. I had one lawyer who reported to me who spent ALL of his work hours doing FOIA requests to
learn why he hadn't earned "superior" on his last review. We tried to hint that perhaps that was because he did nothing substantive for ED. but he couldn't be fired. Every single program at ED can be 1) contracted out; 2) sent back to HHS (where ED matters were at HEW before ED was created by Carter): or, better yet 3) sent back to the states, who are, after all, closer to constituents so can bettet determine their needs. And, no, I'm not a Trumper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No more FAFSA, so good luck getting aid.
That authority would move back to the Treasury Department.
Also closing DOE entirely would require a supermajority of 60 senators, meaning some Dems would need to join all the Reps, which is unlikely to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No more FAFSA, so good luck getting aid.
That authority would move back to the Treasury Department.
Also closing DOE entirely would require a supermajority of 60 senators, meaning some Dems would need to join all the Reps, which is unlikely to happen.
I have a feeling I know who you voted for. If you think they would go this far to shutter the DOE just for the services to be performed by another department, I have a bridge to sell you. They want less children in college, especially poor ones.
College is woke. All use the same bathroom at college. Stay away.
Can your DC get into the schools we commonly talk about here? I don't see any hillbillies at my Alma mater.
I guess you didn't get into Yale Law.
Sure, Jan.
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No more FAFSA, so good luck getting aid.
That authority would move back to the Treasury Department.
Also closing DOE entirely would require a supermajority of 60 senators, meaning some Dems would need to join all the Reps, which is unlikely to happen.
Where six 19-24 year old coders have the keys. Cool, cool.
Education Department makes sure schools are complying with IDEA and other federal laws (including anti-discrimination laws). Without them, oversight probably reverts to the states.
They collect data about school performance, but we can just leave that to US News, right? Your representatives won't get government data to guide them on education legislation, they'll just read parent reviews on GreatSchools.com. I'm sure it'll be fine.
That NEAP report that was just in the news last week? That's done by a division of the Dept of Ed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, OP, the RANKINGS are your foremost concern if DOE is shuttered?
Second most concern. I'm worried about funding for research. I have a feeling it might not last for medicine and engineering heavy schools.
This 1000%! PHD students will struggle to have their programs funded. There is a reason we have some of the Top universities in the world, and well funded meaningful research is a huge part of that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a former ED official. The ED has always been a bloated, useless agency (Thanks, Carter). What you don't understand is that when the agency was created, every useless staffer or lawyer in other agencies were sent to ED, which is how I ended up managing over 100 staff and lawyers much later. I can't begin to tell you how dysfunctional they were. I had one lawyer who reported to me who spent ALL of his work hours doing FOIA requests to
learn why he hadn't earned "superior" on his last review. We tried to hint that perhaps that was because he did nothing substantive for ED. but he couldn't be fired. Every single program at ED can be 1) contracted out; 2) sent back to HHS (where ED matters were at HEW before ED was created by Carter): or, better yet 3) sent back to the states, who are, after all, closer to constituents so can bettet determine their needs. And, no, I'm not a Trumper.
This is the disheartening part of the whole exercise. I'm also not a Trumper but before this I never understood just how much bloat there is in government.
And you still have no idea because you are just basing your opinion on an anonymous random.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No more FAFSA, so good luck getting aid.
That authority would move back to the Treasury Department.
Also closing DOE entirely would require a supermajority of 60 senators, meaning some Dems would need to join all the Reps, which is unlikely to happen.
Where six 19-24 year old coders have the keys. Cool, cool.
Education Department makes sure schools are complying with IDEA and other federal laws (including anti-discrimination laws). Without them, oversight probably reverts to the states.
They collect data about school performance, but we can just leave that to US News, right? Your representatives won't get government data to guide them on education legislation, they'll just read parent reviews on GreatSchools.com. I'm sure it'll be fine.
That NEAP report that was just in the news last week? That's done by a division of the Dept of Ed.