Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is easy. Churches cannot participate in elections. But they can talk about theology, policy, and voting. What does religion mean if it does not cause people to act? Bishop Budde--for example--was just talking basic theology. To not have done so would have been a problem.
+1. Budde was just doing her job.
Is that the LWNJ shill that was spouting her liberal opinion disguised as doctrine?
Yes that’s the one. She’s a disgrace to all the real Bible reading Americans.
I call troll.
Any Bible reading Christian knows she was doing her job preaching the gospel and requesting mercy for vulnerable people.
It is a disgrace that Trump demanded an apology for being asked to show mercy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is easy. Churches cannot participate in elections. But they can talk about theology, policy, and voting. What does religion mean if it does not cause people to act? Bishop Budde--for example--was just talking basic theology. To not have done so would have been a problem.
+1. Budde was just doing her job.
Is that the LWNJ shill that was spouting her liberal opinion disguised as doctrine?
Yes that’s the one. She’s a disgrace to all the real Bible reading Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is easy. Churches cannot participate in elections. But they can talk about theology, policy, and voting. What does religion mean if it does not cause people to act? Bishop Budde--for example--was just talking basic theology. To not have done so would have been a problem.
+1. Budde was just doing her job.
Is that the LWNJ shill that was spouting her liberal opinion disguised as doctrine?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is easy. Churches cannot participate in elections. But they can talk about theology, policy, and voting. What does religion mean if it does not cause people to act? Bishop Budde--for example--was just talking basic theology. To not have done so would have been a problem.
+1. Budde was just doing her job.
Is that the LWNJ shill that was spouting her liberal opinion disguised as doctrine?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is easy. Churches cannot participate in elections. But they can talk about theology, policy, and voting. What does religion mean if it does not cause people to act? Bishop Budde--for example--was just talking basic theology. To not have done so would have been a problem.
+1. Budde was just doing her job.
Anonymous wrote:This is easy. Churches cannot participate in elections. But they can talk about theology, policy, and voting. What does religion mean if it does not cause people to act? Bishop Budde--for example--was just talking basic theology. To not have done so would have been a problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
No pastor should be talking about politics to their congregation. Full stop.
Why?
Full stop.
“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all IRC Section 501(c)(3) organizations, includ- ing churches and religious organizations, are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf#11
Did you not know this info?
![]()
You could have fooled me.
I live in a very GOP area.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Clever![]()
But regardless you weren't hammering about this when it was just pro Trump talk. But I have no doubt you and your ilk will pursue this now that you control things. Cracking down 8n churches that don't follow the party line is very Nazi. You know there was a national Nazi church?
How do you know what I have been hammering?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
NP. Of course we know there are pro-Trump pastors. “Prosperity Gospel” is deeply rooted in white supremacy. This is well-documented. People dress bigotry and greed up in religious trappings; nothing we didn’t know about that.
I think you are conflating white evangelicalism with pentecostalism, the latter in some elements peddles the prosperity gospel, and mostly in its black churches (here and in Africa). You are showing you have no idea what these terms mean even though you intend well.
Do some research and come back when you’re done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
NP. Of course we know there are pro-Trump pastors. “Prosperity Gospel” is deeply rooted in white supremacy. This is well-documented. People dress bigotry and greed up in religious trappings; nothing we didn’t know about that.
I think you are conflating white evangelicalism with pentecostalism, the latter in some elements peddles the prosperity gospel, and mostly in its black churches (here and in Africa). You are showing you have no idea what these terms mean even though you intend well.
Do some research and come back when you’re done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
NP. Of course we know there are pro-Trump pastors. “Prosperity Gospel” is deeply rooted in white supremacy. This is well-documented. People dress bigotry and greed up in religious trappings; nothing we didn’t know about that.
I think you are conflating white evangelicalism with pentecostalism, the latter in some elements peddles the prosperity gospel, and mostly in its black churches (here and in Africa). You are showing you have no idea what these terms mean even though you intend well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
No pastor should be talking about politics to their congregation. Full stop.
Why?
Full stop.
“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all IRC Section 501(c)(3) organizations, includ- ing churches and religious organizations, are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf#11
Did you not know this info?
![]()
You could have fooled me.
I live in a very GOP area.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Clever![]()
But regardless you weren't hammering about this when it was just pro Trump talk. But I have no doubt you and your ilk will pursue this now that you control things. Cracking down 8n churches that don't follow the party line is very Nazi. You know there was a national Nazi church?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
No pastor should be talking about politics to their congregation. Full stop.
Why?
Full stop.
“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all IRC Section 501(c)(3) organizations, includ- ing churches and religious organizations, are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf#11
Did you not know this info?
![]()
You could have fooled me.
I live in a very GOP area.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are churches spouting of politics. DOJ should investigate and revoke their tax exempt status
+1
They are not supposed to be talking about politics. Why is this allowed?
It's okay. There are plenty of pro Trump pastors. But you didn't mean them did you?
This is the danger of your statement. What you said is nonsense.
No pastor should be talking about politics to their congregation. Full stop.
Why?
Full stop.
“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all IRC Section 501(c)(3) organizations, includ- ing churches and religious organizations, are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf#11
Did you not know this info?
![]()
You could have fooled me.
I live in a very GOP area.