Anonymous
04/28/2025 13:35
Subject: MLSN tier 2
100%!Anonymous wrote:Poster on another thread showed boys team rankings. After MLSN academies, MLSN and ECNL were the same. Unless are performing a stock pump and dump, I have no idea why you would care either way for these leagues, they all come and go. Local MLSN academy can't even fund one U14 team so not a good sign for financial longevity there. What's next after MLSN folds? Who knows.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected
ECNL is MLSN2
Remember, the clubs that had both ECNL and MLS Next before ecnl forced the split?
The ECNL teams were the 2nd teams, which are now the MLSN2 teams.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 13:04
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected
ECNL is MLSN2
Remember, the clubs that had both ECNL and MLS Next before ecnl forced the split?
The ECNL teams were the 2nd teams, which are now the MLSN2 teams.
100%!
Anonymous
04/28/2025 12:59
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Poster on another thread showed boys team rankings. After MLSN academies, MLSN and ECNL were the same. Unless are performing a stock pump and dump, I have no idea why you would care either way for these leagues, they all come and go. Local MLSN academy can't even fund one U14 team so not a good sign for financial longevity there. What's next after MLSN folds? Who knows.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected
ECNL is MLSN2
Remember, the clubs that had both ECNL and MLS Next before ecnl forced the split?
The ECNL teams were the 2nd teams, which are now the MLSN2 teams.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 11:36
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected
ECNL is MLSN2
Remember, the clubs that had both ECNL and MLS Next before ecnl forced the split?
The ECNL teams were the 2nd teams, which are now the MLSN2 teams.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 11:30
Subject: MLSN tier 2
You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected
Anonymous
04/28/2025 09:03
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected
Anonymous
04/28/2025 09:02
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Kids who get no playing time in ECNL. Parents and Club who want to pretend their kid is in a top league. MLS Next is the top boys league, no question, MLS Next 2 is just branding.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 09:01
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Very confused about this whole MLSNII situation as we are seeing those who are being offered MLSNII are second and third team players at ECNL clubs or coming from lower level travel clubs. So you would have to say for PP that MLSNII is equal or lower than ECRL. Even more leagues to cause even more confusion.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 08:57
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 08:53
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Don't be fooled thinking coppermine 1 players are going to play mlsn2. Their MLS 2 will be filled with second/third team players.
Where have you seen that Coppermine is listed in MLSNext, not MLSNext New Tier? If not, in the new tier, where are the top teams playing? E64?
MLSNext Expansion
https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/news/mls-next-adds-seven-expansion-teams-ahead-of-2025-26-season
MLSNext New Tier
https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/mls-next-new-competition-tier-teams-and-divisions-2025-26
Anonymous
04/28/2025 08:18
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
But is it’s worth all that travel?? The part of ecnl rl that is great is most games are local — at this point I’d rather if my DS is on a 2nd team just play ncsl and let him enjoy friends and socializing. All the travel is a lot for kids and parents.
Anonymous
04/28/2025 08:05
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.
Anonymous
04/27/2025 14:10
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Pay attention.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Anonymous
04/27/2025 12:22
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral
Don't be fooled thinking coppermine 1 players are going to play mlsn2. Their MLS 2 will be filled with second/third team players.
Anonymous
04/26/2025 14:02
Subject: MLSN tier 2
Anonymous wrote:Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.
Agreed
MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.
ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral