Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
He isn't from WV. He's from Ohio.
The part of Ohio he’s from might as well be West Virginia.
LOL he grew up in a suburb between Cincinnati and Dayton. It's literally the most anodyne location in the country.
Republicans act like he grew up in a holler.
+1. His life story is the fakest most astroturfed thing I’ve ever seen. NY Times ran point on it too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. Being a veteran is simply one of the qualifications a person can list when applying for a job.
It is not like the person is saying he/she is black, hispanic, gay, female, etc. It represents a position that have held in the past.
Not sure why you consider this DEI.
No. When you check the box as a veteran you get preferential treatment. That preference has nothing to do with your ability or qualifications for the job that you applied for. It is a DEI preference.
Anonymous wrote:It is a valid reward for their service. It comes with no guarantees of a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. DEI is generally about immutable characteristics. Being a vet is about your work history. No one is born a vet.
What part of “it’s still giving preference to a group” don’t you understand?
Anonymous wrote:No. Being a veteran is simply one of the qualifications a person can list when applying for a job.
It is not like the person is saying he/she is black, hispanic, gay, female, etc. It represents a position that have held in the past.
Not sure why you consider this DEI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
He isn't from WV. He's from Ohio.
The part of Ohio he’s from might as well be West Virginia.
LOL he grew up in a suburb between Cincinnati and Dayton. It's literally the most anodyne location in the country.
Republicans act like he grew up in a holler.
So in a school setting, legacy status is DEI, right?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Veteran status is often given preference, so yes. Like race and disability, they must be qualified first but yes, they will be given preference once that’s established.
When something is given preference, it doesn't automatically equate to DEI.
Someone may be given preference because they graduated college or HS with a high GPA. Or, they may be given preference because they have successfully managed people in another position. Or they may be given preference because they have experience with a particular software or system.
Lots of reason there is preference in hiring. Basing hiring on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other quality that does not equate to experience or merit is DEI.
You people are so uninformed.
So you're good with extra help based on economic diversity then, right?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. Being a veteran is simply one of the qualifications a person can list when applying for a job.
It is not like the person is saying he/she is black, hispanic, gay, female, etc. It represents a position that have held in the past.
Not sure why you consider this DEI.
No. When you check the box as a veteran you get preferential treatment. That preference has nothing to do with your ability or qualifications for the job that you applied for. It is a DEI preference.
No silly argument. Any race and members of both genders can become a veteran.
Anonymous wrote:No. DEI is generally about immutable characteristics. Being a vet is about your work history. No one is born a vet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Military service is not DEI. The US military is incredibly diverse. Less than 50 percent of soldiers are white males. Whatever preference federal hiring may give to former service members, it's not because of their race, gender, orientation etc. It's simply a recognition of their service to the country and to give them a small boost as they transition into the civilian world. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. If people are upset about it, they have every opportunity to serve themselves.
Well said.
Nobody is upset about it. But it is a form of DEI.
No one is upset, because Veterans are owed this. Veterans are a cut bellow, they require hiring preferences, that goes beyond DEI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
He isn't from WV. He's from Ohio.
The part of Ohio he’s from might as well be West Virginia.