Anonymous wrote:Reduce military spending dramatically.
Convert to a single payer healthcare system
(Other countries spend far less on healthcare than we do bc of greater bargaining power).
Allow younger immigrates to come to the US and expedite their work status - we need more workers to support our aging population.
Fight against ageism to allow older works to work longer.
Allow government to have an equity stake in companies whose technology/innovation supported by federal $$ (ie grants, tax credits etc).
Sadly, none of this will happen. It’s all a deck of cards though which has balanced ok until now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obturningrussian wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let alone $36 trillion? Any ideas?
#ThingsILoseSleepOver
im not and never will be good at economics, but im going to say maybe "taxing the rich" or something, which will never happen under this administration
I'm guessing you've never run the math on that idea.
The rich will flee, like in Europe and states like NY and CA. Only viable option is to cut spending and waste. We also need to look at alternative revenue sources...like tariffs. And no I'm not a Maga. Just worried about debt.
Anonymous wrote:obturningrussian wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let alone $36 trillion? Any ideas?
#ThingsILoseSleepOver
im not and never will be good at economics, but im going to say maybe "taxing the rich" or something, which will never happen under this administration
I'm guessing you've never run the math on that idea.
Anonymous wrote:DoD baby. Stop spending $70,000 on a $1 piece of plastic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tax the super rich. No one should have enough money to buy a president anyway. Solves two problems.
Cato, 2023 ran the math.
If Congress confiscated every dollar earned by individuals and businesses past their first $500,000, it would still be about $200 billion short of covering the cost of next year’s projected $1.7 trillion deficit—unrealistically assuming no behavioral or other economic effects from taxing 100 percent of earnings.
Corporate taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obturningrussian wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let alone $36 trillion? Any ideas?
#ThingsILoseSleepOver
im not and never will be good at economics, but im going to say maybe "taxing the rich" or something, which will never happen under this administration
I'm guessing you've never run the math on that idea.
The rich will flee, like in Europe and states like NY and CA. Only viable option is to cut spending and waste. We also need to look at alternative revenue sources...like tariffs. And no I'm not a Maga. Just worried about debt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, get rid of Citizens United and pass a constitutional amendment requiring public funding of all elections and forbidding any private funding of any kind.
Citizens United doesn't have a GD thing to do with this. You just want it gone, so you're tagging it on for the ride.
No.
Citizens united took away free speech and replaced it with money. Now those with the biggest coffers drown everyone else out, where it comes to politics. With Citizens united we handed the country over to the oligarchs. Citizens United has everything to do with this conversation.
This is 100% true but it's a difficult to truth to accept for many people. It's much easier for the Republicans and Democrats to just hate the other "side" while closing their eyes and assuming their "side" has some genuinely good intent to look after the interests of all Americans.
Most Americans don't realize this but the political struggle is no longer right vs left. The political struggle is between the American people vs the ultra wealthy and powerful donating entities of our two major political parties. Needless to say, the ultra wealthy are winning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tax the super rich. No one should have enough money to buy a president anyway. Solves two problems.
Cato, 2023 ran the math.
If Congress confiscated every dollar earned by individuals and businesses past their first $500,000, it would still be about $200 billion short of covering the cost of next year’s projected $1.7 trillion deficit—unrealistically assuming no behavioral or other economic effects from taxing 100 percent of earnings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, get rid of Citizens United and pass a constitutional amendment requiring public funding of all elections and forbidding any private funding of any kind.
Citizens United doesn't have a GD thing to do with this. You just want it gone, so you're tagging it on for the ride.
No.
Citizens united took away free speech and replaced it with money. Now those with the biggest coffers drown everyone else out, where it comes to politics. With Citizens united we handed the country over to the oligarchs. Citizens United has everything to do with this conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Republicans claim to care about the national debt but constantly cut taxes then complain that the number is going up even faster. They use sunset clauses and other tricks to make it look cheaper than it is but everyone knows they’re full of crap. Even they know. When you hear a Republican talking about the debt or the deficit, they’re lying. Every single time.