Anonymous wrote:A person is so desperate that they are begging for a few dollars in the cold in the street while you live in million dollar homes and drive a warm car and YOU complain? You are vile.
Anonymous wrote:Ha. You McLean peasants are hilarious. You got to McLean and think you’ve actually done something because you live in proximity to a few very wealthy neighborhoods. Imagine living in a 1.5M 3br 1950s split level on a quarter acre and thinking you’re some sort of landed gentry because Chain Bridge Road is in somewhat close proximity. You live in a slightly better located Springfield. Just come to terms with it.
Anonymous wrote:This isn't a McLean problem, it's all over inside the beltway. We bought in McLean 10 years ago, and I never expected that we'd be shielded from something so common as homeless or panhandlers in the tiny downtown area. I will agree that the number of intersection beggars has increased in that time, but I've seen the same where I work in Arlington, and Falls Church. They just look for high volume intersections.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parts of McLean have been an eye sore for multiple decades. You’re just now noticing it. It’s an area with an undeserved reputation. It’s slightly nicer Springfield with pockets of incredible wealth.
Laughing at the idea that some rando on this forum thinks they’re the arbiter of an area’s reputation. Maybe you can get the WSJ to issue a retraction but I doubt it.
I’ve laughed for decades about how McLean residents have so much of their identity and self worth tied up in their glaringly mediocre zip code.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parts of McLean have been an eye sore for multiple decades. You’re just now noticing it. It’s an area with an undeserved reputation. It’s slightly nicer Springfield with pockets of incredible wealth.
Laughing at the idea that some rando on this forum thinks they’re the arbiter of an area’s reputation. Maybe you can get the WSJ to issue a retraction but I doubt it.
I’ve laughed for decades about how McLean residents have so much of their identity and self worth tied up in their glaringly mediocre zip code.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parts of McLean have been an eye sore for multiple decades. You’re just now noticing it. It’s an area with an undeserved reputation. It’s slightly nicer Springfield with pockets of incredible wealth.
Laughing at the idea that some rando on this forum thinks they’re the arbiter of an area’s reputation. Maybe you can get the WSJ to issue a retraction but I doubt it.
Rubbish! Complete rubbish!Anonymous wrote:Do you think property values will drop as DC-based government gets gutted? I don’t think McLean has much going for it other than proximity to the city. It has always been a bit of a soulless dump.
Anonymous wrote:Oh my heavens! In fabulous McLean? Sad part is that most nouveau rich were effectively homeless back in their countries of birth. Sad how $$ changes people.
Anonymous wrote:Parts of McLean have been an eye sore for multiple decades. You’re just now noticing it. It’s an area with an undeserved reputation. It’s slightly nicer Springfield with pockets of incredible wealth.
Anonymous wrote:Parts of McLean have been an eye sore for multiple decades. You’re just now noticing it. It’s an area with an undeserved reputation. It’s slightly nicer Springfield with pockets of incredible wealth.
Anonymous wrote:Do you think property values will drop as DC-based government gets gutted? I don’t think McLean has much going for it other than proximity to the city. It has always been a bit of a soulless dump.