Anonymous wrote:You have zero idea who the best public players are. There are maybe 2 or 3 privates that play a top 20 schedule. And half of those guys sit the bench.Anonymous wrote:Back to you VA public’s haha! Even in the summer league that most of the college commits play in you can see that even the best public players are on average significantly inferior to the better private players. It’s no knock on anyone but when you’ve been playing public competition for four years you’re not going to be at the same level as those private schools players who are playing a top 20 national schedule. ITS JUST NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN!
Do the local privates have more than the 5 PLL players from NOVA publics in that league the last year or 2? I'm guessing yea, but curious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to compare. Other than the top 3 in the WCAC, the rest of the league is terrible. The IAC has three top dogs and the other three are terrible. So overall, the IAC is better with 50% of the league being good whereas only about 25% of the WCAC is any good based on that format which doesn’t mean squat. Head to head it’s top 3 vs top 3. The issue is St Johns has been black balled by all local teams except WCAC teams so you’ll never get to see them play any IAC teams ever.
Bullis plays them and has open dates this year and had open dates last year. GC is not playing Bullis this year either.
Anonymous wrote:Hard to compare. Other than the top 3 in the WCAC, the rest of the league is terrible. The IAC has three top dogs and the other three are terrible. So overall, the IAC is better with 50% of the league being good whereas only about 25% of the WCAC is any good based on that format which doesn’t mean squat. Head to head it’s top 3 vs top 3. The issue is St Johns has been black balled by all local teams except WCAC teams so you’ll never get to see them play any IAC teams ever.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody is comparing bottom teams. Top teams vs top teams WCAC wins.
Predicting it'll happen for the first time ever? That's so bold of you.Anonymous wrote:Nobody is comparing bottom teams. Top teams vs top teams WCAC wins.
Anonymous wrote:Hard to compare. Other than the top 3 in the WCAC, the rest of the league is terrible. The IAC has three top dogs and the other three are terrible. So overall, the IAC is better with 50% of the league being good whereas only about 25% of the WCAC is any good based on that format which doesn’t mean squat. Head to head it’s top 3 vs top 3. The issue is St Johns has been black balled by all local teams except WCAC teams so you’ll never get to see them play any IAC teams ever.
Let's hope for your sake you can play games on paper this year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WCAC was 4 - 10 against them last year. What do you think?Anonymous wrote:Is the WCAC a better lax conference now than the IAC?
“Last year” is the key point.
Anonymous wrote:WCAC was 4 - 10 against them last year. What do you think?Anonymous wrote:Is the WCAC a better lax conference now than the IAC?
WCAC was 4 - 10 against them last year. What do you think?Anonymous wrote:Is the WCAC a better lax conference now than the IAC?
Anonymous wrote:Is the WCAC a better lax conference now than the IAC?