Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2 years ago deferred from Yale, from private in DC
ED 2 Chicago
SAT 1550
GPA 93
Got in
Of course a private full pay kid would get into U Chicago in any of their ED0-3. A 1460 would get into.
Anonymous wrote:2 years ago deferred from Yale, from private in DC
ED 2 Chicago
SAT 1550
GPA 93
Got in
Anonymous wrote:In some ways girls are better positioned to apply ED because they seem to be organized and thinking ahead from the beginning of the process- 9th grade. At least that has been my personal observation. Boys seem to take longer to get into the college-admissions-organization-planning mindset. There have been several articles that discuss this. I’m the parent of a boy and my kid didn’t become serious and focused about college-related things until halfway through junior year/beginning of senior year.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that the holistic admissions process favors girls. DD is at an Ivy and was on a mission to get to an Ivy starting in about 8th grade. She will admit she went through high school checking all the right boxes (clubs/leadership/awards).
DS is a senior and has the same perfect grades and higher SATs but nothing close with ECs. In 8th grade his maturity and sense of who he was was nowhere close to his sister’s. He thought he was going to play 4 years of football and baseball and go into engineering. Today he plans on majoring in philosophy and football/baseball is a distant memory. His essay is about not going through life with a fixed mindset and instead taking risks. My guess is this will all be lost on many AOs and they superficially will pass as on him as he has not checked all the EC boxes.
Anonymous wrote:In some ways girls are better positioned to apply ED because they seem to be organized and thinking ahead from the beginning of the process- 9th grade. At least that has been my personal observation. Boys seem to take longer to get into the college-admissions-organization-planning mindset. There have been several articles that discuss this. I’m the parent of a boy and my kid didn’t become serious and focused about college-related things until halfway through junior year/beginning of senior year.
Anonymous wrote:Well, this is depressing for my daughters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are most ED2 admits to selective schools female? And then male in RD to even out class?
Trying to make sense of what we’ve seen at our private over last 2 cycles with ED2. It’s hard for girls in RD universally.
Also have been told no shot at Vanderbilt RD unless Val/sal; best bet is ED2 and deferral to RD. Is any other school in the lower half of T25 like this? WashU? Rice? Emory?
That’s interesting. My small sample was only boys getting selective RD acceptances. But girls did well at ED. Perhaps the boys were also bigger risk takers and less fond of ED.
Interesting theory
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Boys seemed to do better in RD at my kid’s small private in 2024. Results for ED1 and ED2 were the same for both boys and girls.
Same
Anonymous wrote:Boys seemed to do better in RD at my kid’s small private in 2024. Results for ED1 and ED2 were the same for both boys and girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are most ED2 admits to selective schools female? And then male in RD to even out class?
Trying to make sense of what we’ve seen at our private over last 2 cycles with ED2. It’s hard for girls in RD universally.
Also have been told no shot at Vanderbilt RD unless Val/sal; best bet is ED2 and deferral to RD. Is any other school in the lower half of T25 like this? WashU? Rice? Emory?
That’s interesting. My small sample was only boys getting selective RD acceptances. But girls did well at ED. Perhaps the boys were also bigger risk takers and less fond of ED.