Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weren't the California slaves all asians, mostly Chinese and Japanese?
Yes, but this is nothing but a continuation of the identify politics that failed on national stage, where one race will be given even more privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Weren't the California slaves all asians, mostly Chinese and Japanese?
Anonymous wrote:How would someone prove eligibility?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to the family tree put together by my weird middle-aged, unemployed cousin at his home computer from data sources called "Google" - I'm a descendent of Pochohantas.
Bring on the scholarships!!! I have proof. My kids actually have a hook.
You don't have proof. Documents (US census, military pension, or other government records, birth/death/marriage certificates, wills and contemporaneous records) are proof. Anyone who claims any ancestry prior to 1900 (slave, native American, immigrant story) without checking the records...and a family tree without each step supported by documents is not itself a "record"...is just playing the child's game of telephone with about the same level of reliability.
I actually received a half scholarship for college based on my ethnic heritage, and we had to show the paperwork all the way back to the boat. If you want to claim any benefit to being Native American, you need to provide your tribal enrollment number for a federally recognized tribe and they will check it they same way they verify your status for in-state tuition. CA will surely do the same for this benefit.
NP You don't think this is messed up? Anyone abandoned at birth, product of rape...Will not be able to prove this. I have that issue in my own tree. Tribal enrollment is really controversial too because rules vary so much and can exclude/not exclude people. Not to mention that a white wealthy person can have plenty of clear proof of slave ancestry which sort of defeats the entire point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just suppose… that every single African American high school senior in California claimed to be a descendent of slaves and then had “priority” (which doesn’t mean guaranteed admission) in their application. African Americans are 6% of California’s population.
About 28% of African Americans over age 25 have a four year degree. So let’s say this giant prioritizing increases that to 50% (unlikely anytime soon) in the next generation. That means a whopping 3% of students in the Cal state systems might be African American. If they are able to remain for four years( hard with economic challenges and some will come from poorer high schools).
Mercy!
Tiny price for reparations. Probably would turn out to do a lot of good… social and economic. If it passes, it will have far less effect on the people fearing this than they think.
This x10000. I am so sick of hyper competitive white and Asian people freaking out that Junior didn’t get a spot he must be entitled to get. Junior will be perfectly fine.
It’s entitled to think that a lazy and incompetent kid needs a back door to get something they didn’t earn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to the family tree put together by my weird middle-aged, unemployed cousin at his home computer from data sources called "Google" - I'm a descendent of Pochohantas.
Bring on the scholarships!!! I have proof. My kids actually have a hook.
You don't have proof. Documents (US census, military pension, or other government records, birth/death/marriage certificates, wills and contemporaneous records) are proof. Anyone who claims any ancestry prior to 1900 (slave, native American, immigrant story) without checking the records...and a family tree without each step supported by documents is not itself a "record"...is just playing the child's game of telephone with about the same level of reliability.
I actually received a half scholarship for college based on my ethnic heritage, and we had to show the paperwork all the way back to the boat. If you want to claim any benefit to being Native American, you need to provide your tribal enrollment number for a federally recognized tribe and they will check it they same way they verify your status for in-state tuition. CA will surely do the same for this benefit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just suppose… that every single African American high school senior in California claimed to be a descendent of slaves and then had “priority” (which doesn’t mean guaranteed admission) in their application. African Americans are 6% of California’s population.
About 28% of African Americans over age 25 have a four year degree. So let’s say this giant prioritizing increases that to 50% (unlikely anytime soon) in the next generation. That means a whopping 3% of students in the Cal state systems might be African American. If they are able to remain for four years( hard with economic challenges and some will come from poorer high schools).
Mercy!
Tiny price for reparations. Probably would turn out to do a lot of good… social and economic. If it passes, it will have far less effect on the people fearing this than they think.
This x10000. I am so sick of hyper competitive white and Asian people freaking out that Junior didn’t get a spot he must be entitled to get. Junior will be perfectly fine.
Anonymous wrote:According to the family tree put together by my weird middle-aged, unemployed cousin at his home computer from data sources called "Google" - I'm a descendent of Pochohantas.
Bring on the scholarships!!! I have proof. My kids actually have a hook.
Anonymous wrote:I like this idea better than reparations. It’s actually beneficial to the economy.
Anonymous wrote:I like this idea better than reparations. It’s actually beneficial to the economy.