Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.

She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.

But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.

She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.

Her CNN town hall was just terrible.

How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.

That’s great. But your opinion wasn’t shared by the American electorate.

How do you know it wasn't?

DP

Obviously because she lost.

“All you idiocrats make me mad because I am smarter than you and my girl lost. Trump. Trump. Trump.”

This isn’t fixable because it’s clear in the rear view that winning is less important to democrats than insisting they are better than everyone else. And then being confused as to how that sucks as a strategy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.

She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.

But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.

She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.

Her CNN town hall was just terrible.

How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.

That’s great. But your opinion wasn’t shared by the American electorate.

How do you know it wasn't?

DP

Obviously because she lost.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.

She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.

I agree with everything you said here. But the question is, why did she need to say what she would have done differently during Biden's four years, while Trump never needed to say what he would have done differently during his own four years? He has literally given himself 10 out of 10 for some of his weakest moments (his response to the hurricane in Puerto Rico, COVID) and he continues to insist that the J6 rioters were true American patriots. There was a real double standard at work.

I don’t even understand what your concern is. She had a near limitless money pot and lost. One candidate can never run the other’s campaign. Katie Porter can’t be countered with a whiteboarding wonk. You can’t out RN or MPH a Lauren Underwood. You can’t out-hoodie Fetterman.

I’m also a middle-aged comfortable woman who is all in for Democrats only and you, my “kind” confuse me. Are you determined to be a baby forever? There is no double-standard in terms of how a candidate deals: they just keep moving, altering messaging, and closing any gaps where they keep finding they lack voters and support. Dassit and that’s what’s always been it.

So what is your actual observation? Because all it really is at heart is a bunch of mewling. I don’t feel sorry for you or her or any other befuddled crybaby at this point. She failed. She failed! She did not GOTV. She made some poor strategic choices. I feel sorry for my DC and the worst off of us. I don’t feel sorry for this woman. She wanted the brass ring and failed to get it and the polling told her this was gonna happen and she and the staffers who weren’t laid off all knew it and still begged ordinary people for donations. No. Nope. I’m done with feeling sorry for them forever.

Donald had Elon Musk's money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.

She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.

But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.

She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.

Her CNN town hall was just terrible.

How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.

That’s great. But your opinion wasn’t shared by the American electorate.

How do you know it wasn't?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she only lost by
Less than 400,000 votes (different in the blue wall states.)
The news media is making it seems like she lost like Carter, mccain, Romney or even Trump lost in 2020.
People just didn’t turn out but not a lot has to change.

At the end of the day she lost.

Good candidates don’t win elections.

Dukakis in the tank. Gore with his earth tones. Kerry windsurfing. Harris with her “nothing comes to mind”. All of these moments encapsulating why none of those out of touch people deserved to be President.

Could you explain 'good candidates don't win?'

Anonymous wrote:Kamala has performed poorly in every race she has entered. It's baffling that people think she was a great candidate. She's literally never won a primary. She exited the primary in the previous election with her support in the single digits.

Why is she bad? She lacks coherent messages. I have no idea what she stood for. She campaigned on vague issues (helping Americans, protecting abortion, etc) but never made specific policy proposals. When asked, she said she had like 150 pages of policy proposals. Okay, well, want to discuss them with us? Yes, we can go read 150 pages of policy proposals, but how about you give us an elevator pitch? This inability to communicate her ideas- if she had any, I'm not convinced she did- cost her the election.

I don't understand why democrats keep saying she lost due to being a female or black or Indian or whatever. The natural consequence of this kind of logic is that you're talking yourself out of choosing the best candidates. If that's a white man, do it. If it's a black woman, do it. But this obsession with choosing people based on demographics is a loser. You will not win that way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

The day the DNC can find a WOC like Kemi Badenoch, she will win the election. No more rewards for SAHMs whose husband cheated on them or as a sop to the BLM or any "interest" group.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

Nikki Hailey. We would have voted for her. Your complaint has no grounds.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

The day the DNC can find a WOC like Kemi Badenoch, she will win the election. No more rewards for SAHMs whose husband cheated on them or as a sop to the BLM or any "interest" group.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.

She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.

But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.

She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.

Her CNN town hall was just terrible.

How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.

That’s great. But your opinion wasn’t shared by the American electorate.

How do you know it wasn't?

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she only lost by
Less than 400,000 votes (different in the blue wall states.)
The news media is making it seems like she lost like Carter, mccain, Romney or even Trump lost in 2020.
People just didn’t turn out but not a lot has to change.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected