Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Oh wow. OA is really going down the race to the bottom path... What a shame.
Did OA ever had Algebra 1 in 7th grade? I don't think so. As far as I know, a lower (than other WoP middle schools) lever of Math was always the case for OA. Wasn't it? So, not necessarily the new Principals' fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Who is Dr. Tito?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People the liability excuse is just a cover for the real reason - equity.
If all kids can’t have it then no kids can.
BTW a PR trip at a hotel is not immersion and not anywhere close to the same experience. Also watch and wait if there is even approval for this since there is a cost and it’s not equitable.
You say that as if it's the wrong thing. Of course if not all can go, nobody should go. If equity is such a big deal for you, go to a private school. I bet you can afford it.
You are so entitled and elitist, it's gross. You know, OA has a lot of good things but one bad thing is people like you, who look down on everyone and think they are superior to everyone else.
I hope this new principal ignores all your temper tantrums and does what she need to do to make OA MORE equitable.
Nobody is looking down on anybody. You are making incorrect assumptions.
You don’t make things more equitable by taking away options that strengthen a child’s experience. You find a way to offer it to those who don’t have that option.
People like you and your way of thinking is what is driving families with options away from DCPS and the resources they provide and why more then 1/2 the kids in this city opt out.
As someone said earlier, Adams is not that great and coasting on its reputation. Making it equitable at all costs without seeing the big picture will further drive away families. Good luck with that.
I hope they make oa a pk-5 school and send everyone to MacFarland and Roosevelt. Then you can really work toward educational equity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Oh wow. OA is really going down the race to the bottom path... What a shame.
Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Oh wow. OA is really going down the race to the bottom path... What a shame.
Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Anonymous wrote:We are an OA family and I’m very aware of the “debate” about the international trips. I was surprised to learn that previous trips weee planned and chaperoned by teachers only.
My big concern was the “home stay” in another country. Not sure if I am comfortable sending my 13 year old to stay with strangers. I don’t know why they can’t just get hotels. I get the immersion part but still.
Btw, I like the principal and she has been very transparent about equity. The newest debate is about how to offer algebra 1 in 7th so kids that are ready can take geometry in 8th. So kids took it online but principal is putting a stop to that. So that’s getting parents riled up. Dr Tito was honest tho about the need to prioritize underachieving kids first.
Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the cancelled international home-stay issue, which seems like DCPS at large has some say in, how is the new principal? We are thinking of OA for next year but a little worried about academics given past discussions as well as the recent turnover in principals. Any sense that this one might stick and make sure academics get back / stay on track?
Anonymous wrote:The English side of Oyster should be districtwide. Given the program, absolutely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People the liability excuse is just a cover for the real reason - equity.
If all kids can’t have it then no kids can.
BTW a PR trip at a hotel is not immersion and not anywhere close to the same experience. Also watch and wait if there is even approval for this since there is a cost and it’s not equitable.
You say that as if it's the wrong thing. Of course if not all can go, nobody should go. If equity is such a big deal for you, go to a private school. I bet you can afford it.
You are so entitled and elitist, it's gross. You know, OA has a lot of good things but one bad thing is people like you, who look down on everyone and think they are superior to everyone else.
I hope this new principal ignores all your temper tantrums and does what she need to do to make OA MORE equitable.
Nobody is looking down on anybody. You are making incorrect assumptions.
You don’t make things more equitable by taking away options that strengthen a child’s experience. You find a way to offer it to those who don’t have that option.
People like you and your way of thinking is what is driving families with options away from DCPS and the resources they provide and why more then 1/2 the kids in this city opt out.
As someone said earlier, Adams is not that great and coasting on its reputation. Making it equitable at all costs without seeing the big picture will further drive away families. Good luck with that.
The families in the OA zone already have by right access to an immersion program that most other DC families do not have the same access. Immersion schools should be district wide schools. It is a shame that Latino families in Colombia Heights and Brightwood aren’t afforded equal access to these opportunities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People the liability excuse is just a cover for the real reason - equity.
If all kids can’t have it then no kids can.
BTW a PR trip at a hotel is not immersion and not anywhere close to the same experience. Also watch and wait if there is even approval for this since there is a cost and it’s not equitable.
You say that as if it's the wrong thing. Of course if not all can go, nobody should go. If equity is such a big deal for you, go to a private school. I bet you can afford it.
You are so entitled and elitist, it's gross. You know, OA has a lot of good things but one bad thing is people like you, who look down on everyone and think they are superior to everyone else.
I hope this new principal ignores all your temper tantrums and does what she need to do to make OA MORE equitable.
Nobody is looking down on anybody. You are making incorrect assumptions.
You don’t make things more equitable by taking away options that strengthen a child’s experience. You find a way to offer it to those who don’t have that option.
People like you and your way of thinking is what is driving families with options away from DCPS and the resources they provide and why more then 1/2 the kids in this city opt out.
As someone said earlier, Adams is not that great and coasting on its reputation. Making it equitable at all costs without seeing the big picture will further drive away families. Good luck with that.
The families in the OA zone already have by right access to an immersion program that most other DC families do not have the same access. Immersion schools should be district wide schools. It is a shame that Latino families in Colombia Heights and Brightwood aren’t afforded equal access to these opportunities.
Come on. I don’t live in OA boundaries but Marie Reed is in the Columbia Heights boundaries and Latino families can get into most DCPS schools due to spanish dominant preference.
Lastly, no immersion should not be district wide. It’s a niche. Many families don’t want immersion and not all kids will do well in immersion.
That is why it should be district wide. Everyone has equal opportunity and no one has an immersion school as an in-boundary assigned school.
That’s not happening because immersion is a niche. You have plenty of equal opportunities to get into immersion schools at charters and other DCPS schools.
You can basically get into most big the DCPS schools in K/1st
It shouldn’t be a niche school in a residential neighborhood.