Anonymous wrote:Trump loves a showdown. This is just the pregame for the deportation Super Bowl coming to a screen near you- Trump v Newsom.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homan is blah blah blahing about California, but the goon squads are going to go after the low hanging fruit in the red States.

This is a billionaire grift at the end of the day. How much money can we funnel into the friends and family of trump in the name of deportation. Tangling with California is not going to net them the kind of profits they can get in other states.

This will be a much bigger haul than the wall.

Anonymous wrote:Homan is blah blah blahing about California, but the goon squads are going to go after the low hanging fruit in the red States.

This is a billionaire grift at the end of the day. How much money can we funnel into the friends and family of trump in the name of deportation. Tangling with California is not going to net them the kind of profits they can get in other states.

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about fruit and vegetables from CA. MAGA don't even eat fruit and veggies. Could be why their people are so obese and unhealthy. Hope ACA and medicaid don't go away. There will be a lot more people dying in those red states.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Then states like California won't have to worry if they lose those few federal dollars.

California gets more per capita than the average state. They get more in federal funding than any other state (because they are so big). Their state university system would collapse without federal support, their health care sysstem would collapse without federal support, their police/emergency services would collapse without federal support, their k-12 system would collapse without federal support, they need those federal dollars.

Shh, don't tell them. Also amusing they don't get that that produce has to go somewhere or the "they support red states" argument is null. Oh and try to export it to other countries and the feds would just slap higher tariffs for them to export. It's telling that these morons want to shield known criminals from deportation. It makes zero sense and anyone that wants to is a criminal themselves.

Yeah I was trying to figure out if these people thought that California didn't have to sell the produce to someone. This whole argument is very odd. CA would fold like a chair if federal funds were pulled. At minimum they wouldn't actively impede federal law enforcement.

What the people opining don't realize is that CA farmer's rely on interstate water regulated by guess who? They also receive tax insurance, subsidies and federal tax breaks from guess who? Be a shame if all of these DCUM types didn't get their boxed wine from Modesto.

So you truly don't have a day job huh?

The CA farmers are currently begging for the feds to not deport their workforce. Today, it's all over the news. Subsidies, tax breaks and tax insurance are very moot when their crops are rotting in the fields.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Then states like California won't have to worry if they lose those few federal dollars.

California gets more per capita than the average state. They get more in federal funding than any other state (because they are so big). Their state university system would collapse without federal support, their health care sysstem would collapse without federal support, their police/emergency services would collapse without federal support, their k-12 system would collapse without federal support, they need those federal dollars.

Shh, don't tell them. Also amusing they don't get that that produce has to go somewhere or the "they support red states" argument is null. Oh and try to export it to other countries and the feds would just slap higher tariffs for them to export. It's telling that these morons want to shield known criminals from deportation. It makes zero sense and anyone that wants to is a criminal themselves.

Yeah I was trying to figure out if these people thought that California didn't have to sell the produce to someone. This whole argument is very odd. CA would fold like a chair if federal funds were pulled. At minimum they wouldn't actively impede federal law enforcement.

You have it wrong. California is the 5th largest economy in the world. If the feds withhold funds, then CA withholds funds and guess who loses? The "taker" red states that depend on CA paying more into the system.

That is not how it works.

Newsome is itching for this, and I think he is quite a bit smarter than Homan. He's also a sociopath.

Anonymous wrote:Seems perfectly reasonable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Then states like California won't have to worry if they lose those few federal dollars.

California gets more per capita than the average state. They get more in federal funding than any other state (because they are so big). Their state university system would collapse without federal support, their health care sysstem would collapse without federal support, their police/emergency services would collapse without federal support, their k-12 system would collapse without federal support, they need those federal dollars.

Shh, don't tell them. Also amusing they don't get that that produce has to go somewhere or the "they support red states" argument is null. Oh and try to export it to other countries and the feds would just slap higher tariffs for them to export. It's telling that these morons want to shield known criminals from deportation. It makes zero sense and anyone that wants to is a criminal themselves.

Yeah I was trying to figure out if these people thought that California didn't have to sell the produce to someone. This whole argument is very odd. CA would fold like a chair if federal funds were pulled. At minimum they wouldn't actively impede federal law enforcement.

What the people opining don't realize is that CA farmer's rely on interstate water regulated by guess who? They also receive tax insurance, subsidies and federal tax breaks from guess who? Be a shame if all of these DCUM types didn't get their boxed wine from Modesto.

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5008059-trump-border-czar-threatens-funding/amp/

President-elect Trump’s pick for “border czar,” Tom Homan, on Sunday threatened funding for states that refuse to cooperate in the federal government’s deportation plans.

Fox News’s Mark Levin, in an interview with Homan aired Sunday, said the border czar will have “a very, very powerful weapon that the Democrats, when they’re in power, use against Republican administrations, state and local, all the time: federal funding.”


“If you have a governor who says, ‘I’m not gonna cooperate. … I’m gonna block you,’ well, then, federal funds should be slashed to that state, and I mean hugely so, so the people of that state understand that the governor is the responsible party, that the mayor’s the responsible party,” Levin added.

Homan agreed with Levin, saying “that’s going to happen, I guarantee you,” adding that the president-elect “will do that.”

Homan said Sunday that Democrats needed to put aside their feelings about Trump and cooperate.

“I’ll say this: President Trump has made it clear, we’re going to prioritize public safety threats and national security threats right out of the gate [because] they pose the most danger to this country. What governor or mayor doesn’t want public safety threats and national security threats out of their neighborhoods, out of their communities?” Homan said Sunday.

“That’s their number one responsibility. So you can hate Trump all you want, but you gotta love your community more than you hate President Trump,” he added.

That’s what I can’t understand. Why don’t these governors want dangerous criminals out of their states/communities? It doesn’t make sense from a public safety standpoint at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Then states like California won't have to worry if they lose those few federal dollars.

California gets more per capita than the average state. They get more in federal funding than any other state (because they are so big). Their state university system would collapse without federal support, their health care sysstem would collapse without federal support, their police/emergency services would collapse without federal support, their k-12 system would collapse without federal support, they need those federal dollars.

Shh, don't tell them. Also amusing they don't get that that produce has to go somewhere or the "they support red states" argument is null. Oh and try to export it to other countries and the feds would just slap higher tariffs for them to export. It's telling that these morons want to shield known criminals from deportation. It makes zero sense and anyone that wants to is a criminal themselves.

Yeah I was trying to figure out if these people thought that California didn't have to sell the produce to someone. This whole argument is very odd. CA would fold like a chair if federal funds were pulled. At minimum they wouldn't actively impede federal law enforcement.

You have it wrong. California is the 5th largest economy in the world. If the feds withhold funds, then CA withholds funds and guess who loses? The "taker" red states that depend on CA paying more into the system.

That is not how it works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Then states like California won't have to worry if they lose those few federal dollars.

California gets more per capita than the average state. They get more in federal funding than any other state (because they are so big). Their state university system would collapse without federal support, their health care sysstem would collapse without federal support, their police/emergency services would collapse without federal support, their k-12 system would collapse without federal support, they need those federal dollars.

Shh, don't tell them. Also amusing they don't get that that produce has to go somewhere or the "they support red states" argument is null. Oh and try to export it to other countries and the feds would just slap higher tariffs for them to export. It's telling that these morons want to shield known criminals from deportation. It makes zero sense and anyone that wants to is a criminal themselves.

Yeah I was trying to figure out if these people thought that California didn't have to sell the produce to someone. This whole argument is very odd. CA would fold like a chair if federal funds were pulled. At minimum they wouldn't actively impede federal law enforcement.

What the people opining don't realize is that CA farmer's rely on interstate water regulated by guess who? They also receive tax insurance, subsidies and federal tax breaks from guess who? Be a shame if all of these DCUM types didn't get their boxed wine from Modesto.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Then states like California won't have to worry if they lose those few federal dollars.

California gets more per capita than the average state. They get more in federal funding than any other state (because they are so big). Their state university system would collapse without federal support, their health care sysstem would collapse without federal support, their police/emergency services would collapse without federal support, their k-12 system would collapse without federal support, they need those federal dollars.

Shh, don't tell them. Also amusing they don't get that that produce has to go somewhere or the "they support red states" argument is null. Oh and try to export it to other countries and the feds would just slap higher tariffs for them to export. It's telling that these morons want to shield known criminals from deportation. It makes zero sense and anyone that wants to is a criminal themselves.

Yeah I was trying to figure out if these people thought that California didn't have to sell the produce to someone. This whole argument is very odd. CA would fold like a chair if federal funds were pulled. At minimum they wouldn't actively impede federal law enforcement.

You have it wrong. California is the 5th largest economy in the world. If the feds withhold funds, then CA withholds funds and guess who loses? The "taker" red states that depend on CA paying more into the system.