Anonymous
11/28/2024 11:32
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
No not really. SH is similar size to Deal and Deal sends significantly more kids to Walls.
The other elephant in the room is just because you got into Walls doesn’t mean you will be prepared and competitive with many of the other kids from much higher performing schools who took more rigorous and more advance class offerings
Recent Stuart-Hobson classes are 163-170 students. Recent Deal classes are 475-503 students.
Anonymous
11/28/2024 10:05
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Sort of. The SH students who crack Walls generally went to Brent, Maury or Watkins. We’ve known some of the the current Walls 9th graders who are SH grads from the neighborhood since they were tiny tots. These kids have always been real go getters who read a lot and rock at math. They essentially supplement on their own. My lazy kid would have cruised at SH.
Based on the Honor Society kids who did the panel and tours at the Open House, I’d expect the upcoming rounds of Walls admits to be Ludlow-Taylor heavy. I think about 1/3rd of the kids were from there and the only other school with multiple kids was Watkins. Also clearly a very heavy overlap between Honor Society and drama participants.
Anonymous
11/28/2024 10:00
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
No not really. SH is similar size to Deal and Deal sends significantly more kids to Walls.
The other elephant in the room is just because you got into Walls doesn’t mean you will be prepared and competitive with many of the other kids from much higher performing schools who took more rigorous and more advance class offerings
Sorry, what? SH is much, much smaller than Deal. Like 1/3rd of the size.
Anonymous
11/28/2024 09:43
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
I'm inclined to agree about the prep as long as the SH student did some extra work in social studies and science on their own and maybe the family hired a writing tutor.
We know families who fled chaotic Deal for the burbs or privates after one or two years. We also know people who were fine with SH to the end before Walls, Banneker, Ellington, privates or the burbs.
We know families who fled chaotic Deal for the burbs or privates after one or two years. We also know people who were fine with SH to the end before Walls, Banneker, Ellington, privates or the burbs.
Anonymous
11/28/2024 09:36
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
No not really. SH is similar size to Deal and Deal sends significantly more kids to Walls.
The other elephant in the room is just because you got into Walls doesn’t mean you will be prepared and competitive with many of the other kids from much higher performing schools who took more rigorous and more advance class offerings
The elephant in the room is that Deal sends a lot more kids to Walls because there are a lot more kids at Deal who are prepared to keep up at Walls, because there are more kids at Deal from well-resourced families who can provide the support and home environment needed to allow kids to excel academically.
The kids from SH getting into Deal are prepared to attend Deal. They aren't charity cases. But the proportion of SH's population who both wants to attend Walls AND has the academic ability to do well there is smaller than it is at Deal. However it is growing and is already twice what it was 5 or 6 years ago. The number of UMC families deciding to stick with SH goes up every year. If you live in the neighborhood you can see how it's nearing the critical mass needed to start to make SH a first choice (right now it still tends to be a 2nd or 3rd choice for many parents -- though even that is a huge improvement over a decade ago when it was the 4th or 5th choice or simply not on the table for a lot of Hill families).
As SH gentrifies you will likely see it sending more and more kids to Walls, Banneker, McKinley, especially since it appears that the gentrification of Eastern will lag behind the gentrification of its feeders.
The truth is that there is nothing inherently special about Deal or inherently inferior about SH. Academic outcomes for the average student are different because academic outcomes are strongly correlated to socioeconomic status. If you are a UMC family with two college-educated parents there is not reason to think Deal would prepare your child for a school like Walls any better than SH would.[/quote]
Wishful thinking.
Anonymous
11/28/2024 08:46
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
+1
Anonymous
11/28/2024 04:20
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Sort of. The SH students who crack Walls generally went to Brent, Maury or Watkins. We’ve known some of the the current Walls 9th graders who are SH grads from the neighborhood since they were tiny tots. These kids have always been real go getters who read a lot and rock at math. They essentially supplement on their own. My lazy kid would have cruised at SH.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 23:26
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
No not really. SH is similar size to Deal and Deal sends significantly more kids to Walls.
The other elephant in the room is just because you got into Walls doesn’t mean you will be prepared and competitive with many of the other kids from much higher performing schools who took more rigorous and more advance class offerings
The elephant in the room is that Deal sends a lot more kids to Walls because there are a lot more kids at Deal who are prepared to keep up at Walls, because there are more kids at Deal from well-resourced families who can provide the support and home environment needed to allow kids to excel academically.
The kids from SH getting into Deal are prepared to attend Deal. They aren't charity cases. But the proportion of SH's population who both wants to attend Walls AND has the academic ability to do well there is smaller than it is at Deal. However it is growing and is already twice what it was 5 or 6 years ago. The number of UMC families deciding to stick with SH goes up every year. If you live in the neighborhood you can see how it's nearing the critical mass needed to start to make SH a first choice (right now it still tends to be a 2nd or 3rd choice for many parents -- though even that is a huge improvement over a decade ago when it was the 4th or 5th choice or simply not on the table for a lot of Hill families).
As SH gentrifies you will likely see it sending more and more kids to Walls, Banneker, McKinley, especially since it appears that the gentrification of Eastern will lag behind the gentrification of its feeders.
The truth is that there is nothing inherently special about Deal or inherently inferior about SH. Academic outcomes for the average student are different because academic outcomes are strongly correlated to socioeconomic status. If you are a UMC family with two college-educated parents there is not reason to think Deal would prepare your child for a school like Walls any better than SH would.
Totally disagree. What world are you living in?
The majority of kids at Deal are on and above grade level - 64% math, 78% ELA.
Now let’s look at SH - 17% math, 41% ELA
With no tracking except for math, you really think the rigor in the classes at both schools are similar for all the other subjects? Come on. And math tracking at SH is really just on grade level, not advance.
What nobody tells you is that UMC families who send their kids to SH supplement a lot to compensate for deficiencies. I’m not willing to do that for my kid because there is only so much time in the day. I’m not interested in basically running a cram school after school.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 22:51
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
No not really. SH is similar size to Deal and Deal sends significantly more kids to Walls.
The other elephant in the room is just because you got into Walls doesn’t mean you will be prepared and competitive with many of the other kids from much higher performing schools who took more rigorous and more advance class offerings
The elephant in the room is that Deal sends a lot more kids to Walls because there are a lot more kids at Deal who are prepared to keep up at Walls, because there are more kids at Deal from well-resourced families who can provide the support and home environment needed to allow kids to excel academically.
The kids from SH getting into Deal are prepared to attend Deal. They aren't charity cases. But the proportion of SH's population who both wants to attend Walls AND has the academic ability to do well there is smaller than it is at Deal. However it is growing and is already twice what it was 5 or 6 years ago. The number of UMC families deciding to stick with SH goes up every year. If you live in the neighborhood you can see how it's nearing the critical mass needed to start to make SH a first choice (right now it still tends to be a 2nd or 3rd choice for many parents -- though even that is a huge improvement over a decade ago when it was the 4th or 5th choice or simply not on the table for a lot of Hill families).
As SH gentrifies you will likely see it sending more and more kids to Walls, Banneker, McKinley, especially since it appears that the gentrification of Eastern will lag behind the gentrification of its feeders.
The truth is that there is nothing inherently special about Deal or inherently inferior about SH. Academic outcomes for the average student are different because academic outcomes are strongly correlated to socioeconomic status. If you are a UMC family with two college-educated parents there is not reason to think Deal would prepare your child for a school like Walls any better than SH would.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 22:48
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Deal is 3x larger. Were you thinking of Hardy?
Anonymous
11/27/2024 22:41
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
No not really. SH is similar size to Deal and Deal sends significantly more kids to Walls.
The other elephant in the room is just because you got into Walls doesn’t mean you will be prepared and competitive with many of the other kids from much higher performing schools who took more rigorous and more advance class offerings
Anonymous
11/27/2024 20:14
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
This is useful information, and it's pretty impressive. No stake in SH (not in bounds and have a kid already in a different middle school.) If I was at a feeder and my kid really wanted to go, I would have a hard time saying no.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 16:02
Subject: Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no really great middle school option in this area. Read some of the posts about Basis. It has a for-profit parent company, high teacher turnover rate, and a not so great facility. It also self-selects for a smart and motivated peer group which makes it the overall best option for some students but being self-motivated and willing to do a large volume of homework is important and a lot of kids are not developmentally going to be ready for or happy at that type of middle school program.
Never fails that a BASIS hater comes out of the blue. You probably don't even have a kid at BASIS/
OP- BASIS is fine, great even. Convenient location, likeminded peers, sports, a Spring musical. Yes, the building sucks, but it goes through 12th grade, so you don't need to deal with the HS application process. If your child is smart and likes to learn, I don't see why you wouldn't at least apply.
Why not apply? No outdoor space, uninspired leadership, high teacher turnover, essentially no performing arts, weak sports/no playing fields, essentially no recognition of kids' talents outside a narrowly academic sphere, no languages taught before 8th grade (then just for beginners). Need I go on? The truth is that SH offers most of what BASIS is lacking outside serious academics. If only there was a way to meld BASIS academics and SH enrichment with a stable faculty and a good Head in this obnoxious DC political climate. I'd sign up for that in-boundary middle school fast.
Ridiculous.
You are comparing a school where most of the students are below grade level to Basis, the top public school in the city?
No, BASIS isn't the top public school in the city. Walls, JR top tier and possible Banneker are. Look at their college admissions successes for their upper echelon. They beat BASIS. Weak high school ECs, cramming four years of HS academics into three and too much math acceleration for average students hurt most BASIS students.
A good many SH students end up at Walls and Banneker. I know of 10 kids from my boy's cohort at a DCPS ES who applied to Walls, 3 from SH, 3 from BASIS, 4 from Latin. All 3 from SH were admitted along with 1 from Latin. That's it. Sure, this evidence of preferential treatment in Walls admissions from SH is anecdotal but it's still interesting.
Where does one find this data?
and I meant top middle school in the city, as this thread is about SH.
I can't find the data on admissions to selective DCPS high schools by middle school and I've looked hard and called DCPS and OSSE (leaving messages).
If anybody knows where to find it, please let us know.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/student-enrollment-pathways
Lots of n<10, which makes it harder to get a good sense, but you can get a rough sense based on the variety of selective high schools students are admitted to and the consistency of admission over multiple school years.
Deal, Hardy, Oyster and DCI are the only ones with exact numbers (10 or over), everyone else is less than 10. includes SH, EH, Basis, Latin, Francis, ITS, etc. Many middle schools on the list.
Keep in mind the overall class size at each of these schools. It would be unrealistic for Deal (400+ 8th graders) and ITDS (40+ 8th graders) to send an equivalent number of students. It helps here to look over multiple years. Which schools are consistently sending students to Walls?
There are TON of schools that send between 1 and 9 kids to Walls every year. Like, 20 different schools.
So look at it the other way. Since this thread is about Stuart-Hobson, Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Walls in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: n<10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Banneker in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: n<10
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: n<10
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to McKinley in
SY19-20: n<10
SY20-21: 14
SY21-22: 12
SY22-23: 23
Stuart-Hobson 8th graders to Duke Ellington in
SY19-20: 14
SY20-21: 11
SY21-22: 10
SY22-23: 14
Stuart Hobson sent 8 kids to Walls last year. It was in the Open House slides presentation, which is available on its website.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 14:26
Subject: Re:Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, Stuart-Hobson is sending students to each of the top application high schools every year. And in at least one year, it's n=>10. Taken together, this suggests that Stuart-Hobson is probably sending somewhere on the higher end of 1-9 students to these schools on the years where n<10.
n<10 means n<10.
Brilliant.
This is the data that's available. These are the rough logical inferences you can make where the data is not complete. Nobody is forcing you to look at it.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 14:13
Subject: Re:Current experience at Stuart Hobson?
Anonymous wrote:So, Stuart-Hobson is sending students to each of the top application high schools every year. And in at least one year, it's n=>10. Taken together, this suggests that Stuart-Hobson is probably sending somewhere on the higher end of 1-9 students to these schools on the years where n<10.
n<10 means n<10.
Brilliant.