Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanted her to but realized red American just can't have a black female in charge.
Leutenant governor of Virginia would like a word.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did...because I live in the DC bubble where people think January 6 actually mattered. Sad!
Your orange little dictator sent mobs to lynch his VP, and you think it is OK. Did you live in the Trump Hotel to butter him up and keep your grift going?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. She was appointed to the vice presidency which is a nothingburger as she clearly showed during her tenure. When the DNC tried to appoint her to the presidency, game over. No one heard of her during the Biden presidency, then suddenly she was the person behind every thing he did. Even the Democrats had to be leery of her being in charge of the most powerful country in the world. Many women can be president, but Harris does not have the chops.
Appointed? I seem to recall 81 people voting for her to be VP.
81 million, lol. What a terrible typo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought we were pretty misogynistic and racist but I got hopeful after The Lincoln Project founder said her campaign would go down as the best in history and the DC rally. As soon as I looked at the first result at 7:30 I knew I had deluded myself. White women don’t support other white women. So, water is wet.
You are shocked that women can choose someone based on their policy, vs blindly voting for someone like them? So, you would vote for Margaret Thatcher?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had hope because I thought society would be smart enough to vote against Trump at the very least even if they didnt like her.
But, even if you gave her credit for being qualified due to experience, I knew we would not select a woman over a white man even after after all he did/has done. Trump has managed to get a pass on all the vile language, behaviour, being a felon, failed business person and trying to overthrow our government and they all act like its a nothing burger. We could never run a candidate with this many flaws on the Dem side and fall all over ourselves to vote for them. Can't make this $hit up.
We need to stop running woman though because they are simply not electable at this moment in time regardless of how experienced they are.
Kamala had a better resume than Obama ran. How is that not sexist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:White male, I voted for her even though I lean conservative. I honestly thought she was a shoo-in. I really thought enough of this country was tired of Trump...maybe not the policies he stands for, but the man himself, that they'd just say no. I was wrong.
I think what shocked me most was Latino men voting for him as much as they did, given his anti-immigrant rhetoric.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
They’re saying it’s Dems who are tagging @ice on their X profiles? Wow. I can’t even.
Ok, so when you voted for mass deportations, what exactly did you envision?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought we were pretty misogynistic and racist but I got hopeful after The Lincoln Project founder said her campaign would go down as the best in history and the DC rally. As soon as I looked at the first result at 7:30 I knew I had deluded myself. White women don’t support other white women. So, water is wet.
You are shocked that women can choose someone based on their policy, vs blindly voting for someone like them? So, you would vote for Margaret Thatcher?
What policy exactly benefits women under Trump?
Anonymous wrote:I did...because I live in the DC bubble where people think January 6 actually mattered. Sad!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was hoping, but was unsure.
Her biggest flaw was hiding in her safe zone. She didn’t sell her self, she just preached to the choir.
Oh she sold herself... all the way to DA, Senator, VP, and POTUS candidate with absolutely no accomplishments or common sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanted her to but realized red American just can't have a black female in charge.
See, people like you are who I can't stand. So you'll vote for anyone who is black and female. Over any one better, good or a black female who sucks simply based on DEI. That's basically what you said.
Cause she sucked. In so many ways she sucked. She couldn't win this election. She had money, support and was the incumbent and she lost so big. You really think she's all that???!?!!?? Her job was to win and she failed. How good could she possibly be?? People like you think because you like someone, they must be the best, no matter what results show. You think because she represents you or is DEI, she automatically deserves to win and can't possibly be bad. People like you are idiots.
Clearly you're uneducated about politics and current events. All incumbents lost in developed countries. And she still fared batter than all of them and lost narrowly. "It's the economy, stupid"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought we were pretty misogynistic and racist but I got hopeful after The Lincoln Project founder said her campaign would go down as the best in history and the DC rally. As soon as I looked at the first result at 7:30 I knew I had deluded myself. White women don’t support other white women. So, water is wet.
You are shocked that women can choose someone based on their policy, vs blindly voting for someone like them? So, you would vote for Margaret Thatcher?
What policy exactly benefits women under Trump?
Removing illegals from the United States.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought we were pretty misogynistic and racist but I got hopeful after The Lincoln Project founder said her campaign would go down as the best in history and the DC rally. As soon as I looked at the first result at 7:30 I knew I had deluded myself. White women don’t support other white women. So, water is wet.
Looks like Indian and biracial women do not support Indian and biracial women.
Anonymous wrote:Reading these comments is very enlightening. White women get blamed for everything.