Anonymous wrote:Nobody gives a flying F about Walz and the VP pick. Dems are trying to scape goat their meltdown on a white male (yet again). Harris was terrible. The Dems lost because their positions on issues are trash. Walz is so far down on the list for why the Dems lost.
Walz has nothing to do with why the GOP routed the Dems in the Senate as well. The fact that the Dems lost the presidency and the Senate races means they have much larger policy issues beyond Walz.
Anonymous wrote:]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shapiro would not have made the difference. It was a decisive victory. I am a democrat woman and a fed who has been crying all morning and feel like this will irrevocably damage some of my familial relationships but truly this is as close to a mandate as one gets. The country wants him. They will have to live with him. Happy to be in a blue bubble. Deeply worried about my job. Thinking the D's need to find a way to make people hear that their message is not all about DEIA crap and more about making life better for the average american.
But it is. That's why you lost. You're on team discrimination and censorship and child sexualization.
That's just the only message you decided to hear. I heard a lot about helping small businesses, capping food prices, growing infrastructure and protecting women's rights.
I don't even understand the bolded. Trump's entire campaign is built on discriminating against, at minimum, anyone who disagrees with him. You all are effing hypocrites. Believing people who lie to you and basically ADMIT that they lie to you just because they look like you. You get what you voted for. I hope you enjoy it. I think it's 50/50 whether there is another election in 4 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was a lightweight. His folksy schtick on 60 Minutes wasn’t even cute. I don’t think he hurt her but he definitely didn’t help.
PA was always a must win state. Why they didn’t pick Josh Shapiro as VP was baffling.
Baffling? They couldn’t choose him. Your party doesn’t like Jews. You know this.
Unlike MAGA rallies where folks regularly tout Nazi symbols and slogans???
Anonymous wrote:Obviously.
Shapiro would have campaigned better but the Dems miscalculated what would resonate or alienate by assuming more voters would hate the popular governor from a swing state because he’s Jewish.
Next time let’s pick dynamic candidates from swing states.
Anonymous wrote:He was a lightweight. His folksy schtick on 60 Minutes wasn’t even cute. I don’t think he hurt her but he definitely didn’t help.
PA was always a must win state. Why they didn’t pick Josh Shapiro as VP was baffling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was a lightweight. His folksy schtick on 60 Minutes wasn’t even cute. I don’t think he hurt her but he definitely didn’t help.
PA was always a must win state. Why they didn’t pick Josh Shapiro as VP was baffling.
Baffling? They couldn’t choose him. Your party doesn’t like Jews. You know this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not about Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. It's about the Democrats having no bench of campaign talent developed over the past 10 years.
Trump had been campaigning, and only campaigning, for a solid 9 years, and that was after 8 years of soft campaigning and decades of being a celebrity.
Trump is their Taylor Swift, Britney Spears, Kim Kardashian.
They understand that the face is just a face, not the leader. The face wins by being a packaged product for populus, backed by a hug machine behind the scenes. The face doesn't "deserve" to be President; the face's "time" hasn't come; it's not the face's "turn"? the face projects an image of an attractive fantasy. Since JFK won the Presidency with good makeup under hot TV lights, and even before, the constructed image matters more than anything else.
Ronald Reagan, Rosa Parks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. This was a choice between good and evil. All other considerations were secondary.
I'm deeply ashamed of my country today.
You are one of the many reasons Trump won. Your hysteria is most unappealing.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not Walz, it’s not Harris, it’s DEMOCRATS. We don’t want progressive policies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. This was a choice between good and evil. All other considerations were secondary.
I'm deeply ashamed of my country today.
This!!
Jesus Christ as the VP wouldn’t have helped. Evil won.
Democrats: evil won!
Also democrats: why won’t those evil people vote for us?
The antichrist is seductive.
Read your Bible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. This was a choice between good and evil. All other considerations were secondary.
I'm deeply ashamed of my country today.
This!!
Jesus Christ as the VP wouldn’t have helped. Evil won.
Democrats: evil won!
Also democrats: why won’t those evil people vote for us?
Anonymous wrote:It's not about Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. It's about the Democrats having no bench of campaign talent developed over the past 10 years.
Trump had been campaigning, and only campaigning, for a solid 9 years, and that was after 8 years of soft campaigning and decades of being a celebrity.