Anonymous wrote:Why on Earth do so many of you feel the need to make excuses for the obnoxious young person relentlessly harassing/filming a complete stranger? I can’t stand how normalized this anti-social, trashy behavior has become. Good for Kelce for smashing this little punk’s phone.

Who can spot the internal inconsistency here?

Why on Earth do so many of you feel the need to make excuses for the obnoxious young person relentlessly harassing/filming a complete stranger? I can’t stand how normalized this anti-social, trashy behavior has become. Good for Kelce for smashing this little punk’s phone.

Alcoholism or CTE or both? He did seem deranged in his actions and at the moment, he became unhinged. And now he must face criminal charges and likely settle out of court for his maniacal behavior.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If that whiny, baiting college kid is dumb enough to press charges against Kelce or sue him because of the phone, he’d be dragged hard on social media. It wouldn’t be worth it. And the kid was in the wrong. Play dumb games, get your phone smashed. Sorry dude.

Now you wacko Swifties are telegraphing that you’ll cyberbully and smear a victim of a strong arm robbery by some drunk dumb jock? Classy.

NP. Ohhhh OP is that nutjob who posts here constantly about Travis Kelce being a dumb jock and “ick”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:37 year old father of 3 walking around a college campus drunk holding a case of beer. Then using hate speech on a college kid and robbing him of his iPhone. This no impulse control brute needs rehab and should lose his podcast contract.

hate speech? Give us a break.

It's hate speech and it's also at least criminal battery for stealing the phone. A new phone isn't five bucks, they're over $1,000. What happens when you're robbed of $1,000 riding the Metro? The perp gets arrested.

Except the college kid uses the hate speech first so your argument is baseless.

The student didn’t steal anyone’s phone and smash it. That’s the crime.

Fine, but stop using “hate speech” as some sort of criminal act.

It was hate speech. He was using a gay epithet to intimidate and emasculate the boy while robbing the boy of his phone.

The boy used the epithet to intimidate and emasculate kelce but it’s not convenient for you.

Both are in the wrong, but Kelce is the only criminal. And the boy isn’t famous with TV, endorsement and podcast contracts — you can commit robberies on tape and use gay slurs if you’re famous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:37 year old father of 3 walking around a college campus drunk holding a case of beer. Then using hate speech on a college kid and robbing him of his iPhone. This no impulse control brute needs rehab and should lose his podcast contract.

hate speech? Give us a break.

It's hate speech and it's also at least criminal battery for stealing the phone. A new phone isn't five bucks, they're over $1,000. What happens when you're robbed of $1,000 riding the Metro? The perp gets arrested.

Except the college kid uses the hate speech first so your argument is baseless.

The student didn’t steal anyone’s phone and smash it. That’s the crime.

Fine, but stop using “hate speech” as some sort of criminal act.

It was hate speech. He was using a gay epithet to intimidate and emasculate the boy while robbing the boy of his phone.

What do you want him to call him. Dear? Sweetheart? Honey buns?

He showed his true colors and endorsed the use of the gay epithet. Clearly not his first time using it in that way. Then he proceeded to rob the kid of a 1k iPhone, which could be a felony charge.

Okay, drama queen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If that whiny, baiting college kid is dumb enough to press charges against Kelce or sue him because of the phone, he’d be dragged hard on social media. It wouldn’t be worth it. And the kid was in the wrong. Play dumb games, get your phone smashed. Sorry dude.

Now you wacko Swifties are telegraphing that you’ll cyberbully and smear a victim of a strong arm robbery by some drunk dumb jock? Classy.

Strong arm robbery? That’s some hyperbole.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:37 year old father of 3 walking around a college campus drunk holding a case of beer. Then using hate speech on a college kid and robbing him of his iPhone. This no impulse control brute needs rehab and should lose his podcast contract.

hate speech? Give us a break.

It's hate speech and it's also at least criminal battery for stealing the phone. A new phone isn't five bucks, they're over $1,000. What happens when you're robbed of $1,000 riding the Metro? The perp gets arrested.

Except the college kid uses the hate speech first so your argument is baseless.

The student didn’t steal anyone’s phone and smash it. That’s the crime.

Fine, but stop using “hate speech” as some sort of criminal act.

It was hate speech. He was using a gay epithet to intimidate and emasculate the boy while robbing the boy of his phone.

What do you want him to call him. Dear? Sweetheart? Honey buns?

He showed his true colors and endorsed the use of the gay epithet. Clearly not his first time using it in that way. Then he proceeded to rob the kid of a 1k iPhone, which could be a felony charge.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:37 year old father of 3 walking around a college campus drunk holding a case of beer. Then using hate speech on a college kid and robbing him of his iPhone. This no impulse control brute needs rehab and should lose his podcast contract.

hate speech? Give us a break.

It's hate speech and it's also at least criminal battery for stealing the phone. A new phone isn't five bucks, they're over $1,000. What happens when you're robbed of $1,000 riding the Metro? The perp gets arrested.

Except the college kid uses the hate speech first so your argument is baseless.

The student didn’t steal anyone’s phone and smash it. That’s the crime.

Fine, but stop using “hate speech” as some sort of criminal act.

It was hate speech. He was using a gay epithet to intimidate and emasculate the boy while robbing the boy of his phone.

The boy used the epithet to intimidate and emasculate kelce but it’s not convenient for you.

Anonymous wrote:If that whiny, baiting college kid is dumb enough to press charges against Kelce or sue him because of the phone, he’d be dragged hard on social media. It wouldn’t be worth it. And the kid was in the wrong. Play dumb games, get your phone smashed. Sorry dude.

Now you wacko Swifties are telegraphing that you’ll cyberbully and smear a victim of a strong arm robbery by some drunk dumb jock? Classy.

Gonna be so funny when all the Swifties find out this dbag’s identity

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:37 year old father of 3 walking around a college campus drunk holding a case of beer. Then using hate speech on a college kid and robbing him of his iPhone. This no impulse control brute needs rehab and should lose his podcast contract.

hate speech? Give us a break.

It's hate speech and it's also at least criminal battery for stealing the phone. A new phone isn't five bucks, they're over $1,000. What happens when you're robbed of $1,000 riding the Metro? The perp gets arrested.

Except the college kid uses the hate speech first so your argument is baseless.

The student didn’t steal anyone’s phone and smash it. That’s the crime.

Fine, but stop using “hate speech” as some sort of criminal act.

It was hate speech. He was using a gay epithet to intimidate and emasculate the boy while robbing the boy of his phone.

What do you want him to call him. Dear? Sweetheart? Honey buns?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I was referring to the kid as the victim. Is anyone suggesting Kelce was the victim of a crime?

You didn’t read what you started to respond to in the post? It was said that Jason was the victim.

guilty as charged. i failed to read the internet chatter as closely as you did.

Why do you respond to a post if you don’t know what you are responding to?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:37 year old father of 3 walking around a college campus drunk holding a case of beer. Then using hate speech on a college kid and robbing him of his iPhone. This no impulse control brute needs rehab and should lose his podcast contract.

hate speech? Give us a break.

It's hate speech and it's also at least criminal battery for stealing the phone. A new phone isn't five bucks, they're over $1,000. What happens when you're robbed of $1,000 riding the Metro? The perp gets arrested.

Except the college kid uses the hate speech first so your argument is baseless.

The student didn’t steal anyone’s phone and smash it. That’s the crime.

Fine, but stop using “hate speech” as some sort of criminal act.

It was hate speech. He was using a gay epithet to intimidate and emasculate the boy while robbing the boy of his phone.

Anonymous wrote:By Responding, “who is the f@&&%t now?” Kelce shows that he’s just as bigoted as the college student. Then he added violence to the mix. No one looks good in this situation but Kelce looks worse.

+1. Kelce after destroying the fan’s phone replied “who is the F— now”. He was offended by the homophobic slur but then used it to intimidate the kid and violently rob him of his phone.

Both can be wrong but only Kelce’s behavior was criminal. He needs to face a criminal charge for this.