Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because people think poor kids should be happy with whatever they get.
I think all kids should be happy with whatever they get. The holiday gift grab is depressing. None of these gadgets are good for kids and most, if not all, just require that you spend more and more money to actually use them. And then they’re obsolete in no time.
I don’t look at it as a gift grab — rather, as asking for something they are unlikely to ever get. If not asking Santa, then who would they ask? When I can afford it, I will buy that gaming system for them! It brings immense joy to children and offers them the opportunity to participate in conversations with those that have them.
Oh sure. Some day, when you can you’re totally going to do that. Until then you’re going to shame people into doing something you don’t do either.
Sorry, sister — I have done it. I bought an XBoxOne.
Sure. You used future tense but we are supposed to believe you have done this. Did you fall on hard times from making bad financial decisions?
((Sigh). I could afford it then and I can afford it now. I have no idea what the future looks like; however, if I can afford it in the future, I would do it again.
Sigh. Do you not know how the English language works? There is no chance you have ever done this or ever will.
Does it matter if I know the English language or not? I afforded it then, now, and hopefully I can in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because people think poor kids should be happy with whatever they get.
I think all kids should be happy with whatever they get. The holiday gift grab is depressing. None of these gadgets are good for kids and most, if not all, just require that you spend more and more money to actually use them. And then they’re obsolete in no time.
I don’t look at it as a gift grab — rather, as asking for something they are unlikely to ever get. If not asking Santa, then who would they ask? When I can afford it, I will buy that gaming system for them! It brings immense joy to children and offers them the opportunity to participate in conversations with those that have them.
Oh sure. Some day, when you can you’re totally going to do that. Until then you’re going to shame people into doing something you don’t do either.
Sorry, sister — I have done it. I bought an XBoxOne.
Sure. You used future tense but we are supposed to believe you have done this. Did you fall on hard times from making bad financial decisions?
((Sigh). I could afford it then and I can afford it now. I have no idea what the future looks like; however, if I can afford it in the future, I would do it again.
Sigh. Do you not know how the English language works? There is no chance you have ever done this or ever will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To me, it seems as if it’s nothing more than a sign of the times. No one seems to get a new bicycle or one baby doll or new jacket for Christmas anymore. Everything is technology gadgets these days and everything is expensive! This would be the one chance that kid could have at getting an expensive Christmas gift. If an anonymous donor is buying, who wouldn’t encourage their kid to put that one thing that’s out of their price range on the list?
Why do you get upset when you see the letters for the expensive items?
What’s your opinion?
People want these kids to ask for socks. And just be grateful to get them.
I’m UMC. Santa always brings socks and underwear and my kids are thrilled. They get the fancy bamboo underwear or character socks they wanted. Santa obviously brings tons more but don’t diss socks.
People need to get more creative with their kids gifts. In my neighborhood people just give away like new fancy bicycles- what a good Christmas gift. Or boxes of toys and legos are just given away. I always get my kids toys used as it’s just better for the environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what’s a reasonable price point in 2024? Wagons are $119/$135, Barbie Campers are $90, bicycles are no lower than $80/90.. I mean.. it’s not cheap to get anything!
I buy gifts for a child every year (some years two children.) Not through the "USPS Santa Letters Gift Exchange" (I've actually never heard of that one) but through a different organization. I typically spend between $300-400 per child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To me, it seems as if it’s nothing more than a sign of the times. No one seems to get a new bicycle or one baby doll or new jacket for Christmas anymore. Everything is technology gadgets these days and everything is expensive! This would be the one chance that kid could have at getting an expensive Christmas gift. If an anonymous donor is buying, who wouldn’t encourage their kid to put that one thing that’s out of their price range on the list?
Why do you get upset when you see the letters for the expensive items?
What’s your opinion?
People want these kids to ask for socks. And just be grateful to get them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what’s a reasonable price point in 2024? Wagons are $119/$135, Barbie Campers are $90, bicycles are no lower than $80/90.. I mean.. it’s not cheap to get anything!
I buy gifts for a child every year (some years two children.) Not through the "USPS Santa Letters Gift Exchange" (I've actually never heard of that one) but through a different organization. I typically spend between $300-400 per child.
Anonymous wrote:But what’s a reasonable price point in 2024? Wagons are $119/$135, Barbie Campers are $90, bicycles are no lower than $80/90.. I mean.. it’s not cheap to get anything!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its best not to buy anything the adults can pawn for cash.
-Grew up poor.
Yeah, why give them the opportunity to buy some groceries that their kids might need more than the junk you plan to give them.
Anonymous wrote:Its best not to buy anything the adults can pawn for cash.
-Grew up poor.