Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Simmons is further out in MD but they may be taking new patients. GW MFA was good a few years ago but had a ton of turnover since then and I know people who had a lot of issues there.
I delivered with MFA in 2023 after the major turnover. They have hired many new doctors since I delivered there, too. It was great in 2023. I wouldn't be surprised if you can be seen there even without your records.
Anonymous wrote:shs2024 wrote:In the same situation. Does anyone have experiences with RHJ or Dr. Desouza? These are the other two providers besides Bloom and CWC that Foxhall recommended.
RUN from RHJ. I had an absolutely horrible experience (was essentially misdiagnosed when I clearly had fibroids and at the same time they left a detailed message w/ someone else's name and very detailed info on my vm and messed up my billing). I switched from them to CWC and was very happy if that is an option?
Anonymous wrote:Simmons is further out in MD but they may be taking new patients. GW MFA was good a few years ago but had a ton of turnover since then and I know people who had a lot of issues there.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this is a malpractice issue. Maybe they had some cases and that made the rates rise.
Dr Pardo did not call me, to answer the question of the poster who wondered if Green was the only one calling patients. But I am not pregnant.
They really should have given nine months notice, if you ask me.
Foxhall has really gone downhill since Malone left.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. Messenger now seems to be in Bethesda. She was good treating me as gyn.
https://www.doximity.com/pub/lauren-messinger-md
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Outrageous. How is this not a consumer protection issue for the patients currently (or until recently) under Foxhall’s care for an ongoing pregnancy.
Under HIPAA if the records are not received within 30 days it's an OCR complaint. And 30 days is an "outer limit" ...These are active pregnant patient files not archived records.
Some posts indicate that the practice is presenting barriers to the patients requesting and receiving their PHI. Go to Timeliness in Providing Access.
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/access/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Outrageous. How is this not a consumer protection issue for the patients currently (or until recently) under Foxhall’s care for an ongoing pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Beckerman turned 60 and was already planning to wind down his obstetrics practice at the end of this year. He told me as much at the beginning of 2024.
Anonymous wrote:Outrageous. How is this not a consumer protection issue for the patients currently (or until recently) under Foxhall’s care for an ongoing pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:CWC and Bloom are both not accepting new patients. Only appointment I could get is with RJH. May have to switch hospitals from Sibley, but want to try to stay close. Which providers deliver at Holy Cross?