Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump made up the September 4 date and the rules. Fox didn’t propose either the date that Trump made up or the rules he made up. Is Trump ok?
What rules did Trump make up?
He said there would be an audience. That is not anywhere in the letter Fox sent out requesting a debate on September 10- not Septembrr 4.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump made up the September 4 date and the rules. Fox didn’t propose either the date that Trump made up or the rules he made up. Is Trump ok?
What rules did Trump make up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only point Trump has is that he’s running scared. 🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?
Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.
I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).
She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.
Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.
she should not do it. Neither should he.
Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.
C-Spans “most patient man in news” would be a great moderator![]()
PBS would be another neutral option.
NPR or MSNBC would be great choices too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?
Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.
I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).
She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.
Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.
she should not do it. Neither should he.
Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.
C-Spans “most patient man in news” would be a great moderator![]()
PBS would be another neutral option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?
Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.
I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).
She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.
Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.
she should not do it. Neither should he.
Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.
Anonymous wrote:They should do both debates. The American people deserve it. All the major news networks are biased for one candidate or another. The public sees this regularly. There's no reason why they can't do both debates, September 4th and September 10th. If there is no debates, the only loser will be the American people.
Anonymous wrote:They should do both debates. The American people deserve it. All the major news networks are biased for one candidate or another. The public sees this regularly. There's no reason why they can't do both debates, September 4th and September 10th. If there is no debates, the only loser will be the American people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?
Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.
I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).
She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.
Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.
she should not do it. Neither should he.
Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?
Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.
I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).