Anonymous wrote:I'm just here to say that the term "stinking" is so low class.
We could say "underperforming" , even "lousy" which is something my silent generation mother uses- like they are infested with lice. Even "sucky" which is my own low class gen-x proclivity. But "stinking"? So disgustingly diaper-esque. I'm ashamed of you OP. Do better.
Or, just do as well as ... an olympiad?
Anonymous wrote:I haven’t read the whole thread, but in swimming it would help if the U.S. would stop training swimmers like Leon Marchand who then turn around and beat us in the Olympics.
Anonymous wrote:I'm just here to say that the term "stinking" is so low class.
We could say "underperforming" , even "lousy" which is something my silent generation mother uses- like they are infested with lice. Even "sucky" which is my own low class gen-x proclivity. But "stinking"? So disgustingly diaper-esque. I'm ashamed of you OP. Do better.
Or, just do as well as ... an olympiad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of medals but not much gold. It’s really swimming that is having an embarrassingly bad competition compared to prior Olympics.
Quite a few Olympic swimmers from other countries actually train here in the US. They come here for college, compete in the NCAA, and stay here after graduating to continue training with their college coach. This has always gone on to some extent, but seems like it’s become more prevalent recently. So at least some of the success by athletes from other countries may be due to US based training and coaching.
Anonymous wrote:Even when they win they are not great. This women's gymnastics team that won, not impressive. So maybe talent is decreasing worldwide in sport. Maybe too much time on phones, not enough at practice.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of medals but not much gold. It’s really swimming that is having an embarrassingly bad competition compared to prior Olympics.
Anonymous wrote:For the sake of argument, let's accept OP's premise as true.
Maybe it's because other countries have formal, nationally funded sports schools and, when athletes are older, essentially support them as professional athletes. Whereas here in the US we rely on families to pay from childhood on, or on the athletes to work full time to earn money for pay for their sports. My daughter is in an individual summer Olympic sport, and the amount of funding available from her federation even for athletes competing internationally is negligible. It's financially irrational, if not impossible, for middle class families to do this.
Then add in NCAA rules that don't allow college athletes in individual sports to keep prize money from tournaments (there is a lawsuit now about this).