Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was Gymkhana in London
It was good, don't get me wrong. 2 Michelin star good? Highly questionable. I just don't see how it was leagues above Rasika in DC. Service was fine except for the missed drink order. Food was tasty. But it wasn't mind warping. The portion was massive for the tasting menu. We had to take away the main course, because we were both gut bustingly full by the time it came out. I have a dirty secret - we had to literally throw the food away because there was no fridge in the hotel room, nor anyway to heat it up even if we did want it eat it. Imagine that - having to throw away a large portion of Michelin starred meal in the trash!
I honestly just have had better meals in Rockville and and Falls Church than most of the Michelin places we have gone to. Michelin starred restaurants like Tim Ho Wang back when they had a star....it was good but whatever. I don't really remember it 8 years later. We've tried various other Michelin starred places over the years. I honestly just cannot even remember the courses or any of the foods that have ever stuck in my brain from any Michelin meal ever. Meanwhile, I can still taste the chicken and rice dish with the most amazing broth ever that I had in Thailand for $1.75 per plate. If I am ever in death row, that $1.75 meal will be my.last request.
I dunno who ever crowned Michelin as the experts on food.
lol. I’ve been to Gymkhana numerous times - definitely an awesome restaurant. It’s not very typical for a Michelin 2 Star, but not because of the quality of the food. It was a very comfortable 1 Star and it is impressive they got another star (last year).
Rasika is fine, but is no where close. And no, you didn’t find a better meal in Rockville or Falls Church. You lost all credibility. You just think it makes you seem sophisticated to complain about the tourists and the portions and put down a 2 star restaurant as beneath your elevated tastes.
You sound like an idiot with too much money to spend. Prob the same type who blows cash on a Porsche yet knows f**k all about driving. I bet Michelin starred chefs could splooge in your soup and you'd be convinced they're serving you gourmet crap because of the price you paid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was Gymkhana in London
It was good, don't get me wrong. 2 Michelin star good? Highly questionable. I just don't see how it was leagues above Rasika in DC. Service was fine except for the missed drink order. Food was tasty. But it wasn't mind warping. The portion was massive for the tasting menu. We had to take away the main course, because we were both gut bustingly full by the time it came out. I have a dirty secret - we had to literally throw the food away because there was no fridge in the hotel room, nor anyway to heat it up even if we did want it eat it. Imagine that - having to throw away a large portion of Michelin starred meal in the trash!
I honestly just have had better meals in Rockville and and Falls Church than most of the Michelin places we have gone to. Michelin starred restaurants like Tim Ho Wang back when they had a star....it was good but whatever. I don't really remember it 8 years later. We've tried various other Michelin starred places over the years. I honestly just cannot even remember the courses or any of the foods that have ever stuck in my brain from any Michelin meal ever. Meanwhile, I can still taste the chicken and rice dish with the most amazing broth ever that I had in Thailand for $1.75 per plate. If I am ever in death row, that $1.75 meal will be my.last request.
I dunno who ever crowned Michelin as the experts on food.
lol. I’ve been to Gymkhana numerous times - definitely an awesome restaurant. It’s not very typical for a Michelin 2 Star, but not because of the quality of the food. It was a very comfortable 1 Star and it is impressive they got another star (last year).
Rasika is fine, but is no where close. And no, you didn’t find a better meal in Rockville or Falls Church. You lost all credibility. You just think it makes you seem sophisticated to complain about the tourists and the portions and put down a 2 star restaurant as beneath your elevated tastes.
Anonymous wrote:It was Gymkhana in London
It was good, don't get me wrong. 2 Michelin star good? Highly questionable. I just don't see how it was leagues above Rasika in DC. Service was fine except for the missed drink order. Food was tasty. But it wasn't mind warping. The portion was massive for the tasting menu. We had to take away the main course, because we were both gut bustingly full by the time it came out. I have a dirty secret - we had to literally throw the food away because there was no fridge in the hotel room, nor anyway to heat it up even if we did want it eat it. Imagine that - having to throw away a large portion of Michelin starred meal in the trash!
I honestly just have had better meals in Rockville and and Falls Church than most of the Michelin places we have gone to. Michelin starred restaurants like Tim Ho Wang back when they had a star....it was good but whatever. I don't really remember it 8 years later. We've tried various other Michelin starred places over the years. I honestly just cannot even remember the courses or any of the foods that have ever stuck in my brain from any Michelin meal ever. Meanwhile, I can still taste the chicken and rice dish with the most amazing broth ever that I had in Thailand for $1.75 per plate. If I am ever in death row, that $1.75 meal will be my.last request.
I dunno who ever crowned Michelin as the experts on food.
Anonymous wrote:I went to two Michelin star place in Milan and just... eh. Throwing caviar on everything to justify the price doesn't make for a good meal.
I wasn't a fan of Minibar or Fiola either. Pineapple and Pearls was at least a good experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I appreciate your post, OP. We were going to try a 2 star Michelin next for the experience after watching The Bear. We'll save our $$$ and dine at the non-starred but well-reviewed restaurants in the places we are headed.
I can’t imagine watching The Bear and having your takeaway be that you want to try a Michelin starred restaurant. That show makes me want the Italian beef sandwiches they served in the first season, all of the frou frou cuisine with garnishes applied with tweezers just makes everyone miserable.
Anonymous wrote:I appreciate your post, OP. We were going to try a 2 star Michelin next for the experience after watching The Bear. We'll save our $$$ and dine at the non-starred but well-reviewed restaurants in the places we are headed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know. Sorry you haven't had a good experience but maybe don't overgeneralize?
The dinners I had at Daniel and Inn at Little Washington were two of the best nights of my life. I was almost tearful at a couple of the courses and remember them vividly. We had so much fun. They are very special memories for my DH and I and a huge splurge that we don't regret at all.
The dinner I had in the kitchen at Inn of Little Washington was just ok. One course was truly amazing but the rest was not memorable. No plans to go back and have had much better and cheaper meals.