Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everyone I know at my high school was given a car by their parents when they got their drivers license. This is the norm among upper middle class and above households. These parents want their kids to focus on grades in school and don’t want a minimum wage job (during the school year) to jeopardize their chances of getting into a good college.
What era was this? Also I am missing the connection between getting a car and taking a minimum wage job.
The difference nowadays is many kids have no interest in driving and a fair number don’t get a license in HS. This is especially true in wealthy, close in parts of the DMV (Bethesda as example) where kids prefer to Uber vs drive themselves.
Whereas 30 years ago at a HS like my kid probably 90% of kids would get a license at 17…now it’s less than 50%.
This was relatively recent. After 2010 in an affluent suburban town.
Many UMC parents don’t want their kids working long hours after school to pay for a car on their own. They would rather have them focus on getting good grades.
Again…a kid will just Uber which gives them plenty of independence. They aren’t getting a job to buy a car on their own in 2024.
Anonymous wrote:My grandparents gave both me and my sibling a car when we got our drivers licenses. My parents paid for car insurance and car maintenance until we finished college and got a full time job. This is normal and most students attending elite universities are given cars by their parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everyone I know at my high school was given a car by their parents when they got their drivers license. This is the norm among upper middle class and above households. These parents want their kids to focus on grades in school and don’t want a minimum wage job (during the school year) to jeopardize their chances of getting into a good college.
What era was this? Also I am missing the connection between getting a car and taking a minimum wage job.
The difference nowadays is many kids have no interest in driving and a fair number don’t get a license in HS. This is especially true in wealthy, close in parts of the DMV (Bethesda as example) where kids prefer to Uber vs drive themselves.
Whereas 30 years ago at a HS like my kid probably 90% of kids would get a license at 17…now it’s less than 50%.
This was relatively recent. After 2010 in an affluent suburban town.
Many UMC parents don’t want their kids working long hours after school to pay for a car on their own. They would rather have them focus on getting good grades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everyone I know at my high school was given a car by their parents when they got their drivers license. This is the norm among upper middle class and above households. These parents want their kids to focus on grades in school and don’t want a minimum wage job (during the school year) to jeopardize their chances of getting into a good college.
What era was this? Also I am missing the connection between getting a car and taking a minimum wage job.
The difference nowadays is many kids have no interest in driving and a fair number don’t get a license in HS. This is especially true in wealthy, close in parts of the DMV (Bethesda as example) where kids prefer to Uber vs drive themselves.
Whereas 30 years ago at a HS like my kid probably 90% of kids would get a license at 17…now it’s less than 50%.
This was relatively recent. After 2010 in an affluent suburban town.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everyone I know at my high school was given a car by their parents when they got their drivers license. This is the norm among upper middle class and above households. These parents want their kids to focus on grades in school and don’t want a minimum wage job (during the school year) to jeopardize their chances of getting into a good college.
What era was this? Also I am missing the connection between getting a car and taking a minimum wage job.
The difference nowadays is many kids have no interest in driving and a fair number don’t get a license in HS. This is especially true in wealthy, close in parts of the DMV (Bethesda as example) where kids prefer to Uber vs drive themselves.
Whereas 30 years ago at a HS like my kid probably 90% of kids would get a license at 17…now it’s less than 50%.
This was relatively recent. After 2010 in an affluent suburban town.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everyone I know at my high school was given a car by their parents when they got their drivers license. This is the norm among upper middle class and above households. These parents want their kids to focus on grades in school and don’t want a minimum wage job (during the school year) to jeopardize their chances of getting into a good college.
What era was this? Also I am missing the connection between getting a car and taking a minimum wage job.
The difference nowadays is many kids have no interest in driving and a fair number don’t get a license in HS. This is especially true in wealthy, close in parts of the DMV (Bethesda as example) where kids prefer to Uber vs drive themselves.
Whereas 30 years ago at a HS like my kid probably 90% of kids would get a license at 17…now it’s less than 50%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, UMC parents buy their kids a car during HS.
If your kid goes to say Yale or Notre Dame or NYU and doesn’t drive at college, you’re going to keep their old car in the garage? No. You’re going to unload it. So they’ll need another car when they graduate.
Most people absolutely do not do this. They keep the car at their parents house or find somewhere to park it off campus. Selling a car because someone going to school is something a poor people do. Most kids going to schools like this come from families that can afford to spend a few hundred a month on a car no one is using.
Poor people keep cars in the driveway for five to six years. Rich don’t even own daily driver cars that old. You do not know what you’re talking about. A prissy rich girl isn’t driving her high school Audi or Jeep after she graduates from college. She’s going to ask for a new one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, UMC parents buy their kids a car during HS.
+1
And it’s a nice new car too!
UMC is a big range, lower end would be around a 200-250k HHI. That’s not high enough to randomly spend $40k on a nice new car for your dumb teenage kid without it hurting. Sure maybe at 700k HHI
The kids we know who get cars from their parents get hand me down cars. We live in McLean.Anonymous wrote:Assuming you got rid of their high school car and they attended a college where they lived on campus and/or in a city they didn't need a car. Now they've graduated and begin a job in a region that requires a car. Does it go without saying UMC and wealthy parents go car shopping with their college grad kid the summer after they graduate, so they can begin their career with a stable vehicle? UMC parents should pay for the entire car, or only a large down payment... or parents co-sign a lease and pay the up-fronts but the kid will pay the monthly payment? Unsure what is normal.