Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, a more broader, philosophical objection is, you're not adding to the universe. You're taking. You're not giving. You're leaving nothing behind. In an environment of overpopulation that could be seen as a good thing by some. However, for those in a fortuitous position, financial able, able to provide, well, highly educated -- it's just a loss to society. A loss to the rest of us. Again, you leave nothing behind.
And on a personal level. More to love. Family lineage is a stronger bond. You aren't providing any value-added.
This is silly. Our good deeds to others absolutely do leave something behind, whether or not you have children.
For who? If children aren't made then are you doing this for the future deer population?
CF people know that the world is overpopulated. We are not going to have a shortage of children anytime soon. Adding a few less is not going to collapse society like you seem to think it is.
Then you are free to not make kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, a more broader, philosophical objection is, you're not adding to the universe. You're taking. You're not giving. You're leaving nothing behind. In an environment of overpopulation that could be seen as a good thing by some. However, for those in a fortuitous position, financial able, able to provide, well, highly educated -- it's just a loss to society. A loss to the rest of us. Again, you leave nothing behind.
And on a personal level. More to love. Family lineage is a stronger bond. You aren't providing any value-added.
This is silly. Our good deeds to others absolutely do leave something behind, whether or not you have children.
For who? If children aren't made then are you doing this for the future deer population?
CF people know that the world is overpopulated. We are not going to have a shortage of children anytime soon. Adding a few less is not going to collapse society like you seem to think it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, a more broader, philosophical objection is, you're not adding to the universe. You're taking. You're not giving. You're leaving nothing behind. In an environment of overpopulation that could be seen as a good thing by some. However, for those in a fortuitous position, financial able, able to provide, well, highly educated -- it's just a loss to society. A loss to the rest of us. Again, you leave nothing behind.
And on a personal level. More to love. Family lineage is a stronger bond. You aren't providing any value-added.
This is silly. Our good deeds to others absolutely do leave something behind, whether or not you have children.
For who? If children aren't made then are you doing this for the future deer population?
CF people know that the world is overpopulated. We are not going to have a shortage of children anytime soon. Adding a few less is not going to collapse society like you seem to think it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, a more broader, philosophical objection is, you're not adding to the universe. You're taking. You're not giving. You're leaving nothing behind. In an environment of overpopulation that could be seen as a good thing by some. However, for those in a fortuitous position, financial able, able to provide, well, highly educated -- it's just a loss to society. A loss to the rest of us. Again, you leave nothing behind.
And on a personal level. More to love. Family lineage is a stronger bond. You aren't providing any value-added.
This is silly. Our good deeds to others absolutely do leave something behind, whether or not you have children.
For who? If children aren't made then are you doing this for the future deer population?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, a more broader, philosophical objection is, you're not adding to the universe. You're taking. You're not giving. You're leaving nothing behind. In an environment of overpopulation that could be seen as a good thing by some. However, for those in a fortuitous position, financial able, able to provide, well, highly educated -- it's just a loss to society. A loss to the rest of us. Again, you leave nothing behind.
And on a personal level. More to love. Family lineage is a stronger bond. You aren't providing any value-added.
This is silly. Our good deeds to others absolutely do leave something behind, whether or not you have children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think it’s selfish. At all! I think it’s wise.
+100. Who would want to bring anyone into this world too? You have to be very selfish to do that to a poor child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they're mad at their own selfish choices.
Whether you have kids or not, both are equally selfish. Adopting and fostering are much less selfish though, because you're opting to take care of people who already exist in this world.
This is so much bull. If you’re depriving yourself from having kids so you can take care of the kids of people who didn’t care but had them anyway, you’re just a plain idiot.
Can you give a rational and logical explanation of why it's "idiotic?"
Or are you just offended and mad that pp called out this selfishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they're mad at their own selfish choices.
Whether you have kids or not, both are equally selfish. Adopting and fostering are much less selfish though, because you're opting to take care of people who already exist in this world.
This is so much bull. If you’re depriving yourself from having kids so you can take care of the kids of people who didn’t care but had them anyway, you’re just a plain idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Because they're mad at their own selfish choices.
Whether you have kids or not, both are equally selfish. Adopting and fostering are much less selfish though, because you're opting to take care of people who already exist in this world.
Anonymous wrote:Op, a more broader, philosophical objection is, you're not adding to the universe. You're taking. You're not giving. You're leaving nothing behind. In an environment of overpopulation that could be seen as a good thing by some. However, for those in a fortuitous position, financial able, able to provide, well, highly educated -- it's just a loss to society. A loss to the rest of us. Again, you leave nothing behind.
And on a personal level. More to love. Family lineage is a stronger bond. You aren't providing any value-added.