Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never met a woman who was in daycare/aftercare as a child also want that for her own kids. The problem is no one talks about what it costs to avoid this until you’ve had a baby.
I actually think is a huge benefit of dcum—keeping it real for young women who stumble upon posts like this.
seriously, you have to be strategic in your 20s when you’re dating about the kind of life you’re gonna have over the next two decades.
So what is your proposal for the 99% of the population that doesn’t marry someone in BigLaw, medicine, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Warehousing of kids, overseen by surly (and sometimes sketch teenagers) without zero adults around : my experience at every camp aftercare.
And aftercare in general, school and camp, definitely reenacts Lord of the Flies.
this is wildly untrue.
at our private the aftercare is classes and sports. at camp it's extra sports. granted those are 'nice' options but I toured a public middle for my oldest one and their aftercare is 2 activities (sports or classes). Idk where you guys are sending your kids that the aftercare is so terrible but mine given the option choose aftercare rather than going home early even if given the option bc that's what their friends are doing and where they hang out rather than being alone on ipad.
Anonymous wrote:Daycare has been wonderful for our family. And guess what, you won't be able to tell in 10 years which kids went to daycare and which ones had nannies or sahms. And if you claim that you can, you are lying. And yes I know about the ridiculous, anonymous blog post that makes all those sensational claims about "the science".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never met a woman who was in daycare/aftercare as a child also want that for her own kids. The problem is no one talks about what it costs to avoid this until you’ve had a baby.
I actually think is a huge benefit of dcum—keeping it real for young women who stumble upon posts like this.
seriously, you have to be strategic in your 20s when you’re dating about the kind of life you’re gonna have over the next two decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Warehousing of kids, overseen by surly (and sometimes sketch teenagers) without zero adults around : my experience at every camp aftercare.
And aftercare in general, school and camp, definitely reenacts Lord of the Flies.
this is wildly untrue.
at our private the aftercare is classes and sports. at camp it's extra sports. granted those are 'nice' options but I toured a public middle for my oldest one and their aftercare is 2 activities (sports or classes). Idk where you guys are sending your kids that the aftercare is so terrible but mine given the option choose aftercare rather than going home early even if given the option bc that's what their friends are doing and where they hang out rather than being alone on ipad.
Uh, yeah private school aftercare is probably quite pleasant. You don't get the discipline problems and overcrowding of a public school. The public after cares we went to all had published agendas for "fun" but in reality it all went out the windows after an hour.
No idea why this became an anti daycare thread; several hours with involved caregivers with play time, nap, and a meal is healthy and even SAHM send kids to preschool. It’s the 9 hours of warehousing with underpaid workers and overstimulated kids, that is the issue — and if you want to work at least a full 8 hours you need 9 hours of care, and most careers really need more than 8 hrs to thrive. And of course that still means zero personal time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Warehousing of kids, overseen by surly (and sometimes sketch teenagers) without zero adults around : my experience at every camp aftercare.
And aftercare in general, school and camp, definitely reenacts Lord of the Flies.
this is wildly untrue.
at our private the aftercare is classes and sports. at camp it's extra sports. granted those are 'nice' options but I toured a public middle for my oldest one and their aftercare is 2 activities (sports or classes). Idk where you guys are sending your kids that the aftercare is so terrible but mine given the option choose aftercare rather than going home early even if given the option bc that's what their friends are doing and where they hang out rather than being alone on ipad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m an “anti-aftercare” poster. And a feminist. One has nothing to do with the other. Women should of course be able to work and have full lives. But infants and toddlers should also not be looked after in chaotic institutional settings by minimum-wage employees for 10 hours per day. It’s just wrong in a civilized, wealthy society. And the more anxious society gets, the more vulnerable our kids are. It’s a vicious cycle. And it all coincides with reduced standards in schools, nutrition, environment, security, etc.
I don’t know the solution but the first step in giving children a better start is for the professional classes to recognize the reality most of humankind knows. Flex hours, a few years of paid leave for both sexes, higher pay for daycare workers…all of this would be a start. But all the feminists who deny basic child development make me so upset. In my circle, most of the biggest aftercare and daycare users actually had sahms or nannies themselves.
They think because I didn’t change my name, vote for dems, married late, am an atheist etc that I agree with them. I don’t want anyone to feel judged because it’s not about them—it’s about what’s right for children.
How are you so supposedly educated and not know about Montessori education? They have awesome afrercare too. My kids get mad if I pick them up early and they miss cooking, chess, or any of the other activities.
Also what are you rambling about with child development? Do you run a cooking class from you house after school? And is your chess game good enough to teach chess? And do you also personally teach your kids violin? Flute? What about a second language? You aren't the end all and be all for your child. To believe that is unhealthy!
Anonymous wrote:I’m an “anti-aftercare” poster. And a feminist. One has nothing to do with the other. Women should of course be able to work and have full lives. But infants and toddlers should also not be looked after in chaotic institutional settings by minimum-wage employees for 10 hours per day. It’s just wrong in a civilized, wealthy society. And the more anxious society gets, the more vulnerable our kids are. It’s a vicious cycle. And it all coincides with reduced standards in schools, nutrition, environment, security, etc.
I don’t know the solution but the first step in giving children a better start is for the professional classes to recognize the reality most of humankind knows. Flex hours, a few years of paid leave for both sexes, higher pay for daycare workers…all of this would be a start. But all the feminists who deny basic child development make me so upset. In my circle, most of the biggest aftercare and daycare users actually had sahms or nannies themselves.
They think because I didn’t change my name, vote for dems, married late, am an atheist etc that I agree with them. I don’t want anyone to feel judged because it’s not about them—it’s about what’s right for children.