Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know his motive for killing her. That is all.
My theory is that Leslie left for work but realized she forgot something at home. She called her office (Were cell phones widely used in 1995?) to say she would be late for a meeting, returned home, and found Eugene inside looking for money or valuables to buy drugs. She confronted him. He attacked her, she fought back but he overpowered her and killed her. In a panic, he dragged her upstairs to clean up, perhaps trying to remove any traces of his own blood (Was he injured?), and then fled.
Meanwhile, Leslie's colleague grew concerned when she didn't show up for their meeting. He repeatedly called her home, then contacted her husband, who confirmed he was unaware of any changes to her plans or emergencies. Both rushed home, and the rest we know from the news.
I wonder if Eugene heard the concerned messages on the house answering machine and fled the house realizing that the husband and the colleague were on their way to check on her.
Anonymous wrote:My fear is that he will try to make claims that a dead woman from 23 years ago cannot disprove. He will probably claim they were having an affair, hence why his DNA is under her fingernails. He will likely claim that she attacked him because he wanted to break up with her and his “self defense” got out of hand. Then he tried to clean up the scene and fled in a state of panic. There will be little evidence or contemporaneous accounts to disprove any potential tales he tries to weave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know his motive for killing her. That is all.
My theory is that Leslie left for work but realized she forgot something at home. She called her office (Were cell phones widely used in 1995?) to say she would be late for a meeting, returned home, and found Eugene inside looking for money or valuables to buy drugs. She confronted him. He attacked her, she fought back but he overpowered her and killed her. In a panic, he dragged her upstairs to clean up, perhaps trying to remove any traces of his own blood (Was he injured?), and then fled.
Meanwhile, Leslie's colleague grew concerned when she didn't show up for their meeting. He repeatedly called her home, then contacted her husband, who confirmed he was unaware of any changes to her plans or emergencies. Both rushed home, and the rest we know from the news.
I wonder if Eugene heard the concerned messages on the house answering machine and fled the house realizing that the husband and the colleague were on their way to check on her.
Not a bad theory but the murder was in 2001, not 1995 - that’s when the daughter and the murderer graduated. Definitely cell phones were widely used by 40-something professionals in 2001.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know his motive for killing her. That is all.
My theory is that Leslie left for work but realized she forgot something at home. She called her office (Were cell phones widely used in 1995?) to say she would be late for a meeting, returned home, and found Eugene inside looking for money or valuables to buy drugs. She confronted him. He attacked her, she fought back but he overpowered her and killed her. In a panic, he dragged her upstairs to clean up, perhaps trying to remove any traces of his own blood (Was he injured?), and then fled.
Meanwhile, Leslie's colleague grew concerned when she didn't show up for their meeting. He repeatedly called her home, then contacted her husband, who confirmed he was unaware of any changes to her plans or emergencies. Both rushed home, and the rest we know from the news.
I wonder if Eugene heard the concerned messages on the house answering machine and fled the house realizing that the husband and the colleague were on their way to check on her.
Not a bad theory but the murder was in 2001, not 1995 - that’s when the daughter and the murderer graduated. Definitely cell phones were widely used by 40-something professionals in 2001.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know his motive for killing her. That is all.
My theory is that Leslie left for work but realized she forgot something at home. She called her office (Were cell phones widely used in 1995?) to say she would be late for a meeting, returned home, and found Eugene inside looking for money or valuables to buy drugs. She confronted him. He attacked her, she fought back but he overpowered her and killed her. In a panic, he dragged her upstairs to clean up, perhaps trying to remove any traces of his own blood (Was he injured?), and then fled.
Meanwhile, Leslie's colleague grew concerned when she didn't show up for their meeting. He repeatedly called her home, then contacted her husband, who confirmed he was unaware of any changes to her plans or emergencies. Both rushed home, and the rest we know from the news.
I wonder if Eugene heard the concerned messages on the house answering machine and fled the house realizing that the husband and the colleague were on their way to check on her.
Anonymous wrote:I want to know his motive for killing her. That is all.
Anonymous wrote:I want to know why they thought to grab his DNA 20+ years after the fact and not sooner. Did he blab to someone, who then spoke to police?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this the murderer’s father? Geez.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgil_D._Gligor
This is his mother (and step-mother):
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/29/fashion/weddings/judith-graves-maryellen-madden.html
Anonymous wrote:I want to know his motive for killing her. That is all.
Anonymous wrote:Yes i can’t get past the part about how he wasn’t even interviewed. The dad suspected him and so did the tipper/ neighbor. Did the detective do a crap job or know the guy and his family. Tragedy all around.