Anonymous wrote:PP here — if the point is to keep kids in the same grade together, how does this help?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again. You guys. One blogger said this. Opinions are not facts.
It's not facts, but it wasn't a "blogger". It was the current Pres/VP of ECNL
The 3rd podcast on the topic from ECNL leaders should be a few days.
On the 1st they pointed out that the 3 reasons that the switch to calendar year happened were essentially inaccurate and on the 2nd they said they got the most feedback ever and as good stewards they need to be responsive to the clubs/players. On the 3rd the are addressing the related topic of relative age using a fact based expert.
They have been pretty fact based on the topic but have not really brought up potential solutions like expanding trap player rules, biobanding, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Mine is trapped. In 8th grade during her spring year, soccer nearly stopped due to her 9th grade teammates playing high school so we signed her up for tournaments that allowed individual players to sign up (her coach didnt offer any other play opportunities). She got picked up one weekend and played all that weekend. Two other spring weekends, she played some pick up games with her middle school friends, both boys and girls, which was alot of fun. Now as a rising sophomore, seriously considering leaving soccer for another sport for a few other reasons but the trapped player situation keeps that conversation going. Talked about graduating early but probably wont do that. Another issue, though it the social one. I feel sad 3/4 of teammates will move on a year early, repeating the middle school/high school transition.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's U16 ECNL team has three kids that go to the same high school. The other 15 go to 15 completely different schools. He's been on teams that had boys in three different grades on the same team. The kids were also from 5 or 6 different areas. There really isn't much reason for this school year thing anymore, because the kids gravitate to a certain club for whatever reason they have.
Sorry to say there is a reason. It’s not about going to the same school. That does not matter. The issue comes in both 8 and 11-12 in a way it does not with calendar year. The U18-19 is a disaster for the 20-30% of juniors on what is a team of seniors preparing to go to college. (which used to be only a junior team or only a senior team). They want to play high level for their junior year and get seen/recruited the spring of their junior year but the rest of their team checks out come spring as they are graduating. Same happens in 8th for kids who want to play but their season stops so all the freshman can play high school. This does not matter for MLs because they don’t allow high school ball. In school year everybody is going to college at the same time u less their parents redshirted them (a choice some make). It’s a mess for a large chunk of kids which is why ECNL has tried so many workarounds in their policies (ie- 8th graders can play down for half a year (dumb as they don’t even know the teams they are then thrusted into mid year and then those teams real players get benched because roster bloats with 20-30% more kids for 6 months. Its a mess). I wish they would revert and stop the stupidness of having a program geared toward college recruiting that makes that process messy at best.
I get that, but those trapped players become the U19 players on the U18/19 teams. They get an extra year of club soccer to develop.
You must have a younger kid. U-19 is not about development anymore. It’s about recruiting. The extra year is not good because they are always off cycle for the rules and norms of boys recruiting (Junior year) and so the college coaches don’t see them in the right recruiting season. They go to watch a junior team and the kid is a sophomore and can’t be contacted. And when they are seniors on a team with juniors it’s too late as all recruiting slots are gone. It’s a PIA for both coaches and trapped players. If you know, you know.
100% with a 2005 Senior now (October bday). Really effing sucked. All of his teammates graduated a year ahead of time--then he was a senior on a team with all juniors his final year. He was a sophomore when they were recruiting --and, yes, he couldn't be contacted but more importantly hadn't gone thru growth spurt yet. It was a very uphill battle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again. You guys. One blogger said this. Opinions are not facts.
It's not facts, but it wasn't a "blogger". It was the current Pres/VP of ECNL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's U16 ECNL team has three kids that go to the same high school. The other 15 go to 15 completely different schools. He's been on teams that had boys in three different grades on the same team. The kids were also from 5 or 6 different areas. There really isn't much reason for this school year thing anymore, because the kids gravitate to a certain club for whatever reason they have.
Sorry to say there is a reason. It’s not about going to the same school. That does not matter. The issue comes in both 8 and 11-12 in a way it does not with calendar year. The U18-19 is a disaster for the 20-30% of juniors on what is a team of seniors preparing to go to college. (which used to be only a junior team or only a senior team). They want to play high level for their junior year and get seen/recruited the spring of their junior year but the rest of their team checks out come spring as they are graduating. Same happens in 8th for kids who want to play but their season stops so all the freshman can play high school. This does not matter for MLs because they don’t allow high school ball. In school year everybody is going to college at the same time u less their parents redshirted them (a choice some make). It’s a mess for a large chunk of kids which is why ECNL has tried so many workarounds in their policies (ie- 8th graders can play down for half a year (dumb as they don’t even know the teams they are then thrusted into mid year and then those teams real players get benched because roster bloats with 20-30% more kids for 6 months. Its a mess). I wish they would revert and stop the stupidness of having a program geared toward college recruiting that makes that process messy at best.
I get that, but those trapped players become the U19 players on the U18/19 teams. They get an extra year of club soccer to develop.
You must have a younger kid. U-19 is not about development anymore. It’s about recruiting. The extra year is not good because they are always off cycle for the rules and norms of boys recruiting (Junior year) and so the college coaches don’t see them in the right recruiting season. They go to watch a junior team and the kid is a sophomore and can’t be contacted. And when they are seniors on a team with juniors it’s too late as all recruiting slots are gone. It’s a PIA for both coaches and trapped players. If you know, you know.
Anonymous wrote:Again. You guys. One blogger said this. Opinions are not facts.