Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.
I’m sure there are just such walkons on most rosters, but in my daughters experience - coaches recruit for a reason and walk ons just don’t play.
Not my son's experience. Many are walk-ons due to injuries during their recruiting year. They missed the window. One on my son's team was on a top academy team, but missed end of Sophomore and Jr year and is now a starter after walking on Freshmen year.
Look at some of the breakout stars in March Madness that had zero recruits after them and didn't start in D1, walk ons. Same happens in Football.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.
I’m sure there are just such walkons on most rosters, but in my daughters experience - coaches recruit for a reason and walk ons just don’t play.
Not my son's experience. Many are walk-ons due to injuries during their recruiting year. They missed the window. One on my son's team was on a top academy team, but missed end of Sophomore and Jr year and is now a starter after walking on Freshmen year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.
I’m sure there are just such walkons on most rosters, but in my daughters experience - coaches recruit for a reason and walk ons just don’t play.
Anonymous wrote:In D3 it depends on the sport. In D1 most "walk ons" are the recruited kids for whom there wasn't scholarship money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
This is not true.
To the person who posted this, to which sport or sports are you referring ? (Certainly not the case in football, track, cross-country, and tennis.) Are you referring to swimming, soccer & lacrosse ? Doubtful re: baseball.
Nescac men’s soccer are NOT d1 players
I don’t know about other sports but the gap is pretty large. NESCAC players specifically do not play transitions and counter attack nearly at the speed and precision of d1
I don’t know if the gap is smaller between nescac and d1 on the women’s side
Anonymous wrote:What is a “high level NESCAC”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.
Anonymous wrote:DC did walk-on for UVA rowing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.
I’m sure there are just such walkons on most rosters, but in my daughters experience - coaches recruit for a reason and walk ons just don’t play.
Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
This is exactly right. For many sports, they can only offer 2 or 3 spots each year. They count on walk-ons. And I'm talking high level NESCACS. I know you NESCACS dads want to believe your kid is above playing with walk-ons. As a parent of a NESCAC recruited lacrosse player, I promise you, there are walk-ons.