Anonymous wrote:The tacky logo crap just isn't cool anymore. Fashionable women wear more obscure and higher end sporty leisure wear and more specialized running shoes. When I see a big Nike swoosh I think [b]urban kids[i] and trashy classless women like the Kardashians. I'm neither of those things, so why would I want to wear it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think the fact that fewer people wear Nikes makes them more fashionable. I'm on the hunt for a pair right now.
It isn't like they're hard to find.
It's a ghetto shoe, though.
I don't think a racist anonymous internet poster is the arbiter of what's fashionable or not.
Ghetto and ghetto fab are not racist terms in this context; it’s a type of fashion aesthetic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women’s Ons seem really lame to me, and I can’t put my finger on why…I’m no cutting-edge fashionista tho and don’t know anything about them except the people I see wearing them. Anyone else feel that way?
I’m neutral about Ons, but Hokas are butt ugly.[/quote]
Then don't wear them! They are very comfortable and I think they are very cute!
Anonymous wrote:On walks I notice very few of the most stylish women wearing Nikes anymore. And as I'm shopping for a couple of pairs of new shoes, one for actual walks and jogs and one to keep clean for leisure wear, and even the most expensive and newest Nikes look so off. I'm gravitating towards On, Salomon, Hoka ... and maybe New Balance, Saucony, or Asics.
Anonymous wrote:The tacky logo crap just isn't cool anymore. Fashionable women wear more obscure and higher end sporty leisure wear and more specialized running shoes. When I see a big Nike swoosh I think urban kids and trashy classless women like the Kardashians. I'm neither of those things, so why would I want to wear it?
Anonymous wrote:I never see Nikes anymore either. It seems like Hokas suddenly became very popular. I’ve always worn New Balance since they fit me best and now I’m pleased they’re having a moment too.