Anonymous wrote:I am figuring out some aspects of my estate and retirement planning, and I'm curious how much people think is appropriate to leave as an inheritance for your kids. Is there an amount of inheritance that would level that would be too much for each kid? I plan to max out Roth IRA contributions until retirement and not touch this money to leave it as an inheritance for my kids. This means our Roth IRAs will likely have a total inflation-adjusted value of around 3-6 million when I turn 80.
Here's a summary of my projected retirement situation for context.
4,000 monthly pretax pension
2,000 monthly social security (assuming SSI benefits are cut substantially due to current funding issues. The actual amount will likely be around 4k between me and my spouse assuming a 20% cut in benefits)
$5,000 monthly pretax from 401ks (assuming a 4% withdrawal rate and worst historical returns from Cfiresims calculator)
Brokerage account
$2500 a month from our brokerage account (minimum estimate, will likely be more but inflation-adjusted value of brokerage account will certainly exceed 1M in retirement)
A few rental properties (combined value of around 1.4M. I am unsure about the amount of after-tax income so I'm ignoring them for retirement purposes)
Primary residence is worth around 850k, and the mortgage will be paid off before retirement.
In conclusion, if things go very badly, my kids will split an inheritance of at least 8M. However, if market returns are closer to historical norms (25th-50th percentile returns), they will inherit 15M+. I am only going to have 2 or 3 kids, so I am somewhat hesitant about whether this is an appropriate amount to leave my kids or if it is too much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-4 mil to each (assuming 2) and some generation-skipping trusts for the rest of the funds? Some charitable giving, too?
No charitable giving unless I end up being worth like 50M+. Need to ensure the next 2-3 generations of my family will not be in need of charity before I feel comfortable donating.
I wonder if this is a common way to think.
In my family, inheritances are small but charity is still important.
Anonymous wrote:Our kids are still school age so it is hard to tell who they will become. DH and I have had a lot of success and have a current net worth of about $40M. We have about another $10M in life insurance. We have 3 kids. No one needs that much money. If you earn it yourself that is one thing, but IMO it is too much to inherit.
For now our wills leave our kids the max that is not subject to estate tax. The excess is being donated. As the kids get older we will probably lower the amount in todays dollars.
By my estimate if we live into our 80s we will end up with a net worth of $100M+ in todays dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am figuring out some aspects of my estate and retirement planning, and I'm curious how much people think is appropriate to leave as an inheritance for your kids. Is there an amount of inheritance that would level that would be too much for each kid? I plan to max out Roth IRA contributions until retirement and not touch this money to leave it as an inheritance for my kids. This means our Roth IRAs will likely have a total inflation-adjusted value of around 3-6 million when I turn 80.
Here's a summary of my projected retirement situation for context.
4,000 monthly pretax pension
2,000 monthly social security (assuming SSI benefits are cut substantially due to current funding issues. The actual amount will likely be around 4k between me and my spouse assuming a 20% cut in benefits)
$5,000 monthly pretax from 401ks (assuming a 4% withdrawal rate and worst historical returns from Cfiresims calculator)
Brokerage account
$2500 a month from our brokerage account (minimum estimate, will likely be more but inflation-adjusted value of brokerage account will certainly exceed 1M in retirement)
A few rental properties (combined value of around 1.4M. I am unsure about the amount of after-tax income so I'm ignoring them for retirement purposes)
Primary residence is worth around 850k, and the mortgage will be paid off before retirement.
In conclusion, if things go very badly, my kids will split an inheritance of at least 8M. However, if market returns are closer to historical norms (25th-50th percentile returns), they will inherit 15M+. I am only going to have 2 or 3 kids, so I am somewhat hesitant about whether this is an appropriate amount to leave my kids or if it is too much.
Then why are you even asking the question, OP?
If you're young enough that you don't have kids, you have no idea what lies in store for your life. Maybe you won't have that money to leave to your kids. Maybe you won't have kids.
You're ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:We set up irrevocable generation skipping trusts that will benefit our adult children and our grandchildren. We are hoping to use our full lifetime exemptions before it possibly gets reduced after 2025. So it’s a sizable amount! Our kids are very successful on their own and financially savvy and conservative so they will make good use of their inheritance for their kids and their grandkids….I hope. We are generous with them each year with annual gifting as well. What’s left we will either spend or it will go to charity as I have no desire to pay any estate taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-4 mil to each (assuming 2) and some generation-skipping trusts for the rest of the funds? Some charitable giving, too?
No charitable giving unless I end up being worth like 50M+. Need to ensure the next 2-3 generations of my family will not be in need of charity before I feel comfortable donating.
Anonymous wrote:Our kids are still school age so it is hard to tell who they will become. DH and I have had a lot of success and have a current net worth of about $40M. We have about another $10M in life insurance. We have 3 kids. No one needs that much money. If you earn it yourself that is one thing, but IMO it is too much to inherit.
For now our wills leave our kids the max that is not subject to estate tax. The excess is being donated. As the kids get older we will probably lower the amount in todays dollars.
By my estimate if we live into our 80s we will end up with a net worth of $100M+ in todays dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Guessing this is a poor attempt at bragging lol
Anonymous wrote:I just don’t think living off an inheritance is so terrible. As long as my kids are doing something productive and are healthy and happy and good people, I’m fine. But we all have different priorities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Enough to do anything they want with their lives. Not so much that they can do nothing.
This is the truest statement. So the answer, Op, is $2-3m. They would still need to work - but could live incredibly well even on a teacher or hairdresser's salary if that's the field they chose. More than $5 million and believe me, they will do nothing. My most worthless manchild cousins are the ones who received $10M -- unemployed, not involved in the community, and still cry to mommy for more.
Thank your giving thoughtful feedback. But how do I discourage them from taking a low paying job and making up for it with the inheritance. If they are not capable of working in a higher paying jobs it’s fine, but I don’t want a lazy smart kid to rely on the money.
You seriously have nothing better to do with your time? How sad that a man with no kids in his thirties is spending his time like this. Me? I’m in my 50s and am a parent, so I have an excuse. Once you actually make real money, you will go to a lawyer who specializes in estate planning like all the rich grown ups do. She will tell you what her other rich clients do and the pros and cons of structuring trusts. You will learn that you set up trusts with conditions, etc. For now, why you do something more productive.
I already know about trusts. I used to do consulting for people that had SLATs, GRATs, etc. They would leave their kids like 20-30M+ each and it honestly didn't seem to affect behavior of the kids much. They were still going to medical school or working at startups and stuff like that. It just made me hesitant be because it seems like about 75%-80% of the clients kids were fine. However, for the the 20% that turned out badly having access to this wealth absolutely ruined them.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I have thoughts on your actual question but am not going to provide them. Your premise and calculations make no sense, and you also sound like a terrible person.