Anonymous wrote:Your view on this is dictated purely by your own experience
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do elite schools actually matter? Besides prestige and connections, what are the pros?
I have heard from parents of MIT kids of them getting summer research internship and earning 50K over 3 months which pretty much covers the difference between in-state and out of state tuition (MIT does not give any merit based scholarship since it is pretty much the whole school; only need based scholarship). After graduation I have seen them earning twice more than my salary after 20 years of exp in IT. Lot of T20 school kids end up starting their own startups as well with their classmates. There is a reason why students and parents (like us) crave for top schools.
How do you know it’s the institution and not the kid?
They don't. 99% of the time, it's the kid. Those internships are in Boston, so yes most tech internships in a VHCOL area are paying well. Key is the jobs paying them so well are 9/10 also hiring kids from State U and paying them the same thing. There is also a good chance some are making their own connections just from their family/friends (rich kids) and would have similar jobs no matter where they did undergrad. So many factors you haven't accounted for
Anonymous wrote:If T20 schools are so great, why can’t their leaders figure out how to clear a field full of fat ugly female antisemites?
Anonymous wrote:you’ll never get X, Y, Z jobs or get into ABC grad/professional school if you don’t attend
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
This.
The networking. The connections. The opportunities.
I went to a T-20 in the 90s and my siblings did not. There’s a huge divergence in earnings and peer group (my college friends and their outcomes compared to theirs)….
Agree with this. I went to a top Ivy, sibling did not. We both did fine in our careers and lives, but we went on to very different paths. And the people we associate with now are very, very different.
Three decades ago is very different from now. More poor kids can attend top schools. More international students, many of whom will never work in the U.S.n More high stats kids are attending publics due to doughnut hole.
top schools are even more barbell these days…. While OOS flagships are more donut hole - solidly MC families….
Let’s see what happens in 10 years where those kids end up.
I suspect the poor /1G T20 and rich Ivy kids will still be getting most of the $$$$$ gigs after graduation.
While the public flagship kids go to med school, law school or work in back office banking or tech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here we go again. Yo people are insane.
Why? This isn’t a crazy thing to want to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
With holistic admissions and current preferences for athletes, first gen and pell grant eligible, this is not true, Lots if kids at T50 or even T75 who have stats for T20 but didn’t get in due to the aforementioned preferences, were hurt by average ecs, or college’s desire for geographical diversity.
Nope. Lots of qualified great kids don’t get in. But almost nobody who gets in isn’t up to par (in the truly selective schools).
Anonymous wrote:Do elite schools actually matter? Besides prestige and connections, what are the pros?
Anonymous wrote:I think it does help as a low income student. I say this as a low income student who graduated around 8 years ago.
There were a lot of opportunities-career treks abroad to places like Helsinki and Dubai, funded study abroad, funded summer/academic internships, and robust networking opportunities. particularly during the summer. All my internship opportunities were through the school- I was able to do 4 paid internships- 2 over the summer and 2 during the school year. My focus was nonprofits/politics.
I used campus recruiting as one channel for my job search/secured a few interviews, but ultimately got an offer outside of campus recruiting If my goal (at the time) had been a business career/the aim was consulting/banking path senior year recruiting would have been even more helpful.
I think my first employer was pretty equal opportunity school wise. But in subsequent roles/opportunities, I have seen where my school has helped. I have encountered lots of job descriptions which indicate “ attended top schools.” Certainly some hiring managers/my past managers have/had a preference. That being said, at a certain point, probably around 2-4 years in the workforce, your work experience starts mattering more than your school — maybe the school adds a
Overall, I’m doing extremely well income wise and have a lot of savings. I think my parents always thought I might have a bright future, but they’re always in awe when we discuss things like income, etc.
Perhaps my path would have been the same if I went to College Park. I really don’t know. I don’t think I would have had the same internship/trek opportunities though. Not sure how senior year campus recruiting would have worked out. I do know a few College Park students/recent graduates that have fallen through the cracks with respect to recruiting/job opportunities.
My second choice (after the school I went to) was BC, which has risen a lot the past decade and was still strong my senior year of high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here we go again. Yo people are insane.
It’s an illnesses
x10000000
You win, OP. Your schools is the best ever, no contest. Every other student's schools sucks. You happy now?
Please don't feed into OP's mental illness!
+1. Here we go again and again and again!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
With holistic admissions and current preferences for athletes, first gen and pell grant eligible, this is not true, Lots if kids at T50 or even T75 who have stats for T20 but didn’t get in due to the aforementioned preferences, were hurt by average ecs, or college’s desire for geographical diversity.
Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.