Anonymous wrote:This type of thing will really be the final nail in the coffin for public education. They think they can get away with it because people don’t have other options, but they do. Especially those families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bush head of school Percy Abrams just announced he's leaving the school. He was a great HOS. I fully expect a weak social justice hire to replace him, like we have seen for Lakeside and SCDS. When the private schools are the same watered down product as public schools, you really start to have no options.
Bush, Lakeside and SCDS will never have a shortage of parents willing to pay for perceived prestige, especially among old-Seattle types trying to replicate their privilege and new money tech families eager to get a foothold in that universe.
But Percy Abrams leaving is the end of an era and will definitely hobble Bush. The HOS pipeline isn’t very robust. It’s the same people playing musical chairs across the country. There’s an entire generation that bided their time associate or assistant heads and never got their chance, and hiring committees are now drawn to younger leaders without complicated histories but who turn out to be inexperienced leaders.
It’s not even “social justice hires”- it’s just that a lot of candidates don’t have the sophistication or experience to run complex organizations. An inexperienced administration puts huge demands on Boards of Trustees and they’re burnt out and aging out, too. Meanwhile parents expect everything, especially parents new to private schools.
Anyway, in short: I agree. Private school parents feel like they’re not getting their money’s worth but don’t know what else to do, and public schools are doing their best to become a non-option.
Anonymous wrote:Bush head of school Percy Abrams just announced he's leaving the school. He was a great HOS. I fully expect a weak social justice hire to replace him, like we have seen for Lakeside and SCDS. When the private schools are the same watered down product as public schools, you really start to have no options.
Unfortunately, there isn’t really a silver bullet to help struggling kids.
Anonymous wrote:Won’t the Eastside schools simply follow suit and implement similar policies as SPS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 2021, NYC’s then mayor initiated a phase-out of all the city’s gifted and talented programs, for racial equity reasons:
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nyc-schools-to-eliminate-controversial-gifted-talented-classes/3313300/
Massachusetts doesn’t have gifted and talented programs and their public schools always beat every other state in terms of test scores.
And why is a two year old reciting the Gettysburg Address and how does that make the child gifted? My three year old niece could read anything without missing a word and she wasn’t gifted, just a good reader who started a few years earlier than most. Everyone caught up with her.
Massachusetts doesn’t need gifted and talented because it is a state that openly celebrates formal education. Easy to recruit teachers when there is a college on every corner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 2021, NYC’s then mayor initiated a phase-out of all the city’s gifted and talented programs, for racial equity reasons:
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nyc-schools-to-eliminate-controversial-gifted-talented-classes/3313300/
Massachusetts doesn’t have gifted and talented programs and their public schools always beat every other state in terms of test scores.
And why is a two year old reciting the Gettysburg Address and how does that make the child gifted? My three year old niece could read anything without missing a word and she wasn’t gifted, just a good reader who started a few years earlier than most. Everyone caught up with her.
Anonymous wrote:I believe that society is much better off when schools support struggling kids and those with special needs.
The gifted kids will do well in most cases regardless. The only time that they absolutely need differentiation is by age 14