Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: My kids have been at both a large DCPS elementary and private. The public elementary, because it was so big, offered a ton of after school enrichment choices, foreign language, competitive sports, music lessons, etc. They picked what they wanted to do from this or didn’t, had it right after school, and were home with plenty of time for play for the rest of the day. The private, although it was larger for a private, was still smaller than the public and couldn’t offer as much. I will say that the public lunch was gross so we sometimes had to pack it, and it was nice not doing that at the private.
Depends on where one lives, I suppose, and how wealthy a family might be.
Our FCPS ES has zero after school options, zero. We could pay a local church, which has an “after school program” and will pickup kids using a church van from our ES, to send our kids there. But we are not members of that church and their “program” is mostly supervised child care until parents finish work and pickup the kids (some kind of aftercare is essential for many families). That FCPS ES cafeteria reportedly has been closed most of the year due to some issue, so hot lunch is not an option either at least this year, though allegedly the cafeteria will reopen next fall. When it was open, the food was highly processed and not very nutritious. (Also —- We both work, cannot afford a nanny, do not have a house large enough for a live in nanny, and cannot drive kids here and there after their school ends mid-afternoon due to work.)
By contrast, our private has good quality hot lunch (not brought in restaurant food). Their optional after school activities are reasonably priced and include soccer, running, dance, chess, art, math club, science club, etc. Kids get to play and learn with their friends. One of us goes in early to work and handles the pickup from school, while the other parent handles breakfast and makes sure kids get to school safely. It is a no-brainer to stay private for now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised how many people are talking about how important a hot lunch at school is to them. This doesn't even cross my mind as a reason to be in public or private. I don't see the issue with the kids packing leftovers or a sandwich and fruit for lunch. Is that not healthy enough for everyone? Institutional food is almost always lower quality and poorer nutrition than homemade food anyway.
Mine either, but DH is an amazing cook so having hot or not hot lunch doesn't do much for our family like the poster above who worries less about a good dinner every night. We're making something great for dinner regardless of what the kids eat for lunch. Lunches at our public aren't great and we don't have amazing hot lunch at the private we are switching to, so it's moot for our family anyway.
I posted about hot lunch taking the pressure off dinner- I'm a good cook and am also making something great for dinner no matter what. My DD barely picks at a packed lunch and will maybe eat a bite of some sandwich, some thermos leftovers, and some fruit. Everything else sits in the lunchbox. If she has hot lunch, I know she will eat most of her meal and the variety served at school means she is getting calories, nutrition, and being pushed to try new things. Her school serves beautiful curries, fresh roasted chicken, stir fries, etc. and she will eat things there that she might not try at home. It also allows me to be more experimental with dinner. I can push her boundaries at home and take risks with something with more seafood or spice and I don't panic if she doesn't eat much because I know she had a healthy lunch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised how many people are talking about how important a hot lunch at school is to them. This doesn't even cross my mind as a reason to be in public or private. I don't see the issue with the kids packing leftovers or a sandwich and fruit for lunch. Is that not healthy enough for everyone? Institutional food is almost always lower quality and poorer nutrition than homemade food anyway.
Mine either, but DH is an amazing cook so having hot or not hot lunch doesn't do much for our family like the poster above who worries less about a good dinner every night. We're making something great for dinner regardless of what the kids eat for lunch. Lunches at our public aren't great and we don't have amazing hot lunch at the private we are switching to, so it's moot for our family anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is shady. What public school in this country doesn’t have hot lunch?
Also, what public school doesn’t have math daily?
Instruments - has anyone ever seen instrumental groups offered younger than third at public schools? Can’t understand how this is a shock to anyone. Kids get exposed to basics in music special.
Yeah, agree. And public elementary schools typically don’t offer organized sports teams or clubs after school. That starts in middle schools. Nor do kids play instruments. Maybe in later elementary school (4-5th grade) band/orchestra starts if they pick that option.
Yep I’m pretty sure to receive any federal funding public schools must serve hot lunch.
…unless the school kitchen is closed for a (botched, and stretched out) renovation, which prevented cooking a hot lunch, as did happen at a NoVa public elementary.
Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised how many people are talking about how important a hot lunch at school is to them. This doesn't even cross my mind as a reason to be in public or private. I don't see the issue with the kids packing leftovers or a sandwich and fruit for lunch. Is that not healthy enough for everyone? Institutional food is almost always lower quality and poorer nutrition than homemade food anyway.
Anonymous wrote:People ought to choose whichever approach works best for their family.
Anonymous wrote: My kids have been at both a large DCPS elementary and private. The public elementary, because it was so big, offered a ton of after school enrichment choices, foreign language, competitive sports, music lessons, etc. They picked what they wanted to do from this or didn’t, had it right after school, and were home with plenty of time for play for the rest of the day. The private, although it was larger for a private, was still smaller than the public and couldn’t offer as much. I will say that the public lunch was gross so we sometimes had to pack it, and it was nice not doing that at the private.
Anonymous wrote:A boarding school or top country day school, sure. But most privates are lacking in the extra curricular activities, and what they do offer on-site is not comparable to the quality you get off-site at an independent provider of lessons/coaching/whatever. I'm all for getring the free education and using the savings to pay for high quality enrichment outside of school.