Anonymous wrote:Do these students consistently do better with higher ranked LACs as opposed to national universities? I keep reading private schools are more of a known quantity at the smaller schools and maybe not with larger universities that are inundated with applications. I'm thinking of schools like Wesleyan and Davidson.
Anonymous wrote:According to SCOIR data (within the last 3 years), a Sidwell student with a 3.1 GPA was admitted to Harvard. SCOIR doesn’t tell you if the student was an URM, legacy, or sports recruit. I’m pretty sure the kid comes from a wealthy family (plus at least one other hook). I don’t know it for a fact, I just know it’s true.
Anonymous wrote:Do these students consistently do better with higher ranked LACs as opposed to national universities? I keep reading private schools are more of a known quantity at the smaller schools and maybe not with larger universities that are inundated with applications. I'm thinking of schools like Wesleyan and Davidson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an example, student with a 3.4/29 ACT, from a school likeSFS/GDS/Holton. Not an URM nor a legacy.
Holton is not big 3 or big 5.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an example, student with a 3.4/29 ACT, from a school likeSFS/GDS/Holton. Not an URM nor a legacy.
There are literally more than 1,800 schools in the U.S. that offer bachelors degree. So i’d assume pretty much any school that isn’t in the top 100-150?..
No, that's way off. My kid was the master of getting the 89.4 B, so ended up with highest rigor, but a 3.4 unweighted. The final options were private colleges ranked 35 and below, many with merit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an example, student with a 3.4/29 ACT, from a school likeSFS/GDS/Holton. Not an URM nor a legacy.
There are literally more than 1,800 schools in the U.S. that offer bachelors degree. So i’d assume pretty much any school that isn’t in the top 100-150?..
Anonymous wrote:Seriously, what schools are in big 5?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jealous people are talking out of their butts. Wealthy mid-pack prep schoolers get into Michigan, Wake Forest, and even UChicago with ease.
This is not true. Unless you are defining mid-pack as around an A- average. And even then . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, what schools are in big 5?
Sidwell, GDS, NCS, STA and BIM
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an example, student with a 3.4/29 ACT, from a school likeSFS/GDS/Holton. Not an URM nor a legacy.
Holton is not big 3 or big 5.
says who? ridiculous
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an example, student with a 3.4/29 ACT, from a school likeSFS/GDS/Holton. Not an URM nor a legacy.
Holton is not big 3 or big 5.
Anonymous wrote:The “bottom” half at a highly selective rich kid Washington prep school are all very bright…rich…and likely have legacy status at a handful of elite colleges. You trolls are so jealous it’s hilarious. These aren’t publics where the bottom half of the senior class are drug addicts who read and write at a primary school level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP’s example was for the bottom half.
The “bottom” half at a highly selective rich kid Washington prep school are all very bright…rich…and likely have legacy status at a handful of elite colleges. You trolls are so jealous it’s hilarious. These aren’t publics where the bottom half of the senior class are drug addicts who read and write at a primary school level.