Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
You have posted this before. Are your sons STILL at STA or graduated?
I have not posted on this topic this before. Could there possibly be more than one family that has a girl who attends Sidwell and boys who attend STA?
OMG, not possible, right?
Not many have one daughter at Sidwell and 2 at STA. It is unusual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
Interesting. Friends at Sidwell have left because it is a pressure cooker. Friends at NCS actually are happy and do not have the same amount of homework as Sidwell by a long shot.
My daughter was accepted to Sidwell and NCS and chose NCS and is very happy at NCS. Much happier than her peers at Sidwell.
I suspect your daughter is not in high school? NCS starts off slow in 4th but ramps up in MS and by US is ridiculous. It's a school that makes very intelligent girls feel like they’re I dumb.
I love when people assume you don’t know what you’re talking about because our experience does not match yours.
My daughter is in highschool and is an A student. It is rigorous but manageable for HER. She loves NCS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't speak to Sidwell, as I have one child in STA and another in another DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell, so I can speak to that perspective. The schools really are night and day... anyone telling you that they are similar and probably only speaking in huge generalities. We are so happy with STA but I think it fits my child well. Kids that do well there are already self-motivated, like to compete, have another skill (chorus, sports, etc). But with all that competition they also really do nurture the boys and have so many amazing traditions. It's a true prep school. Other schools with their commitment to inclusivity and higher staff turnover don't seem to have a true culture to them. My kid likes the school but it's just not the same. It's the way I felt about my public HS. Enjoyable but the school was not a big part of my childhood. Just a place to go and learn and play sports but not a school spirit within me. It's just a place to get an education. STA is more "all-in" if you will...
There is no DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell.
STA is, and, academically, so is NCS.
NP. No DC private’s national reputation is on par with Sidwell’s reputation. None.
Sidwell is not known nationally. Newspapers may mention Sidwell because of the Obama girls and other presidents, dignitaries kids, but it doesn't have a national reputation
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't speak to Sidwell, as I have one child in STA and another in another DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell, so I can speak to that perspective. The schools really are night and day... anyone telling you that they are similar and probably only speaking in huge generalities. We are so happy with STA but I think it fits my child well. Kids that do well there are already self-motivated, like to compete, have another skill (chorus, sports, etc). But with all that competition they also really do nurture the boys and have so many amazing traditions. It's a true prep school. Other schools with their commitment to inclusivity and higher staff turnover don't seem to have a true culture to them. My kid likes the school but it's just not the same. It's the way I felt about my public HS. Enjoyable but the school was not a big part of my childhood. Just a place to go and learn and play sports but not a school spirit within me. It's just a place to get an education. STA is more "all-in" if you will...
There is no DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't speak to Sidwell, as I have one child in STA and another in another DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell, so I can speak to that perspective. The schools really are night and day... anyone telling you that they are similar and probably only speaking in huge generalities. We are so happy with STA but I think it fits my child well. Kids that do well there are already self-motivated, like to compete, have another skill (chorus, sports, etc). But with all that competition they also really do nurture the boys and have so many amazing traditions. It's a true prep school. Other schools with their commitment to inclusivity and higher staff turnover don't seem to have a true culture to them. My kid likes the school but it's just not the same. It's the way I felt about my public HS. Enjoyable but the school was not a big part of my childhood. Just a place to go and learn and play sports but not a school spirit within me. It's just a place to get an education. STA is more "all-in" if you will...
There is no DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell.
STA is, and, academically, so is NCS.
NP. No DC private’s national reputation is on par with Sidwell’s reputation. None.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
Interesting. Friends at Sidwell have left because it is a pressure cooker. Friends at NCS actually are happy and do not have the same amount of homework as Sidwell by a long shot.
My daughter was accepted to Sidwell and NCS and chose NCS and is very happy at NCS. Much happier than her peers at Sidwell.
I suspect your daughter is not in high school? NCS starts off slow in 4th but ramps up in MS and by US is ridiculous. It's a school that makes very intelligent girls feel like they're dumb.
my daughter is in the upper school at NCS and has been at cathedral schools for a decade. contrary to what some experience, she is having a positive experience. it’s a lot of work but if you have good time management skills, you can get it done in a manageable way. honestly, talking to moms of her peers at STA, the volume of homework and testing is much worse there. this (exam) week, her STA friends had more exams and more material to cover than she did. every kid is going to have a different experience and also, it’s extremely dependent on who you get as a teacher. my daughter has a notoriously difficult English teacher this year and although the books are the same, the other teachers have a much different lesson plan and grading. so some of it is luck. it’s not easy but it’s also not the hell on earth that some make it out to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
You have posted this before. Are your sons STILL at STA or graduated?
I have not posted on this topic this before. Could there possibly be more than one family that has a girl who attends Sidwell and boys who attend STA?
OMG, not possible, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
Interesting. Friends at Sidwell have left because it is a pressure cooker. Friends at NCS actually are happy and do not have the same amount of homework as Sidwell by a long shot.
My daughter was accepted to Sidwell and NCS and chose NCS and is very happy at NCS. Much happier than her peers at Sidwell.
I suspect your daughter is not in high school? NCS starts off slow in 4th but ramps up in MS and by US is ridiculous. It's a school that makes very intelligent girls feel like they’re I dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
Interesting. Friends at Sidwell have left because it is a pressure cooker. Friends at NCS actually are happy and do not have the same amount of homework as Sidwell by a long shot.
My daughter was accepted to Sidwell and NCS and chose NCS and is very happy at NCS. Much happier than her peers at Sidwell.
I suspect your daughter is not in high school? NCS starts off slow in 4th but ramps up in MS and by US is ridiculous. It's a school that makes very intelligent girls feel like they're dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
You have posted this before. Are your sons STILL at STA or graduated?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a daughter at Sidwell and two boys at STA.
Both schools are high pressure and extremely rigorous but STA has a more supportive, tight-knit vibe. The boys compete but the ethos is to acknowledge and appreciate each others’ strengths. Teachers are generally warmer and more engaged. This is a godsend during the high school years because the supportive environment helps mitigate the extreme demands kids face.
Sidwell has the extreme pressure but without as much supportive bonds. Students are competitive with one another. There are pockets of kids who support each other and are good friends. However, there’s more free form anxiety. Teachers are less warm. It’s up to students to find them if they need help.
I know my STA boys have been told countless times by teachers,”Come see me and we can talk about that some more” or something to that effect. Teachers invite you to engage with them. At Sidwell the teachers seem more distant and you have to be more entrepreneurial about getting help.
Sidwell has an edge in the sciences. STA has the edge in sports with the notable exception of basketball.
For a boy, I think STA is better. Our daughter chose Sidwell over NCS because Sidwell is less of a pressure cooker than NCS. She’s still in touch with Beauvoir friends who went to NCS, and she is happy that she did not go there.
Interesting. Friends at Sidwell have left because it is a pressure cooker. Friends at NCS actually are happy and do not have the same amount of homework as Sidwell by a long shot.
My daughter was accepted to Sidwell and NCS and chose NCS and is very happy at NCS. Much happier than her peers at Sidwell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't speak to Sidwell, as I have one child in STA and another in another DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell, so I can speak to that perspective. The schools really are night and day... anyone telling you that they are similar and probably only speaking in huge generalities. We are so happy with STA but I think it fits my child well. Kids that do well there are already self-motivated, like to compete, have another skill (chorus, sports, etc). But with all that competition they also really do nurture the boys and have so many amazing traditions. It's a true prep school. Other schools with their commitment to inclusivity and higher staff turnover don't seem to have a true culture to them. My kid likes the school but it's just not the same. It's the way I felt about my public HS. Enjoyable but the school was not a big part of my childhood. Just a place to go and learn and play sports but not a school spirit within me. It's just a place to get an education. STA is more "all-in" if you will...
A commitment to inclusivity means a school has no “culture”? Of course, expensive privates are elitist but what do you mean that STA culture isn’t inclusive?
I meant that it holds everyone to high standards. The thinking isn't necessarily to meet everyone where they're at... it's more so to set the bar high and expect those to reach it. Rules are rules and expectations are set high. I do think that they will give extra support when needed to help get your child where they need to be but my point is not that you are allowed to just be laissez se faire about grades and be considered successful there.
That’s not how most people define inclusive.
Good thing it's my post. Perhaps that wasn't the best word choice but I meant that putting in the work isn't optional at STA. So I was using the word in the context of inclusivity of different learning styles and commitment to academics. We've attended other schools where assignments were optional, or progressive grading allowed for much ambiguity in determining the actual performance of the student. That's not the culture of STA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't speak to Sidwell, as I have one child in STA and another in another DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell, so I can speak to that perspective. The schools really are night and day... anyone telling you that they are similar and probably only speaking in huge generalities. We are so happy with STA but I think it fits my child well. Kids that do well there are already self-motivated, like to compete, have another skill (chorus, sports, etc). But with all that competition they also really do nurture the boys and have so many amazing traditions. It's a true prep school. Other schools with their commitment to inclusivity and higher staff turnover don't seem to have a true culture to them. My kid likes the school but it's just not the same. It's the way I felt about my public HS. Enjoyable but the school was not a big part of my childhood. Just a place to go and learn and play sports but not a school spirit within me. It's just a place to get an education. STA is more "all-in" if you will...
There is no DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell.
STA is, and, academically, so is NCS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't speak to Sidwell, as I have one child in STA and another in another DC private that is considered on par with Sidwell, so I can speak to that perspective. The schools really are night and day... anyone telling you that they are similar and probably only speaking in huge generalities. We are so happy with STA but I think it fits my child well. Kids that do well there are already self-motivated, like to compete, have another skill (chorus, sports, etc). But with all that competition they also really do nurture the boys and have so many amazing traditions. It's a true prep school. Other schools with their commitment to inclusivity and higher staff turnover don't seem to have a true culture to them. My kid likes the school but it's just not the same. It's the way I felt about my public HS. Enjoyable but the school was not a big part of my childhood. Just a place to go and learn and play sports but not a school spirit within me. It's just a place to get an education. STA is more "all-in" if you will...
A commitment to inclusivity means a school has no “culture”? Of course, expensive privates are elitist but what do you mean that STA culture isn’t inclusive?
I meant that it holds everyone to high standards. The thinking isn't necessarily to meet everyone where they're at... it's more so to set the bar high and expect those to reach it. Rules are rules and expectations are set high. I do think that they will give extra support when needed to help get your child where they need to be but my point is not that you are allowed to just be laissez se faire about grades and be considered successful there.
That’s not how most people define inclusive.