Anonymous wrote:If you don’t like pets don’t date someone with pets. It’s that simple.
Anonymous wrote:Attention to single women in their 30s:
Dogs are not children. Having a dog does not make you a mother. Being obsessed with your fur baby is not giving maternal instincts, it's giving arrested development. I am not interested in women who make their dog the center of their universe.
I (M, 40) was dating a woman (35) who said that she and her German Shepherd are a "package deal" when we were getting serious and thinking about moving in together. I said she had to choose between me and the dog, and she chose the dog. Now she's late 30s and childless but with a giant, smelly canine.
Women, rethink your priorities if this sounds like you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Attention to single women in their 30s:
Dogs are not children. Having a dog does not make you a mother. Being obsessed with your fur baby is not giving maternal instincts, it's giving arrested development. I am not interested in women who make their dog the center of their universe.
I (M, 40) was dating a woman (35) who said that she and her German Shepherd are a "package deal" when we were getting serious and thinking about moving in together. I said she had to choose between me and the dog, and she chose the dog. Now she's late 30s and childless but with a giant, smelly canine.
Women, rethink your priorities if this sounds like you.
You don’t sound like a straight man at all. It’s giving troll from Lipstick Alley. Rethink your own priorities.
Anonymous wrote:You seem like a real catch, I wonder why you’re on the market at 40.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the other hand I know a woman who rehomed her cats for a man and I think a lot less of her as a result. She's had them for years. He was not allergic. He just didn't like them.
I would too.
I mean, I would think poorly of her as well.
I struggle with the idea of being so unattached to pets I'd been with for a long time to do that. I get finding the love of your life but I've been married for 10 years and had my cat for 15, and while I love my husband, it was my cat who laid next to me on the bathroom floor when I had HG through my entire pregnancy and would spend hours puking my guts out. And also when I got laid off and got kind of depressed about it, my DH was supportive but also sometimes stressed me out with questions about finding a new job and money, whereas my cat just cuddled next to me on the couch while I worked on my resume and made me feel like it was going to be okay no matter what.
Anyway, my DH actually likes my cat and gets along great with him and has never suggested we get rid of him. But if I was dating someone and they gave me an ultimatum about my pet, I would pretty much instantly view that as a massive red flag. Even if it was for an understandable reason, like an allergy, the ultimatum speaks to a very entitled, un-empathetic attitude. No thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Attention to single women in their 30s:
Dogs are not children. Having a dog does not make you a mother. Being obsessed with your fur baby is not giving maternal instincts, it's giving arrested development. I am not interested in women who make their dog the center of their universe.
I (M, 40) was dating a woman (35) who said that she and her German Shepherd are a "package deal" when we were getting serious and thinking about moving in together. I said she had to choose between me and the dog, and she chose the dog. Now she's late 30s and childless but with a giant, smelly canine.
Women, rethink your priorities if this sounds like you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP you're being harsh. The dog lives with her. The dog is part of her family. Not a child (and I agree that wayyyyyy too many dog people are overly liberal with their dogs) but asking someone to get rid of their pet is excessive.
If she were bringing the dog everywhere, to stores, restaurants, other people's homes, I'd agree with you. But in HER home? I mean that's where pets are *supposed* to stay.
How does it affect you personally if anyone views their dog as their fur baby? It does not
Oh except it does. It means she will bring it on planes, into restaurants, into the grocery store, and then enact high drama if anyone suggests that Priscilla shouldn't be sniffing the meat cast. It's her BABY after all. These people (mostly women IME) have become such unmanageable brats that we all just let them get away with it.
People can have all the fur babies they want AT HOME. Dress them up, feed them steak from the good china, let them lick your mouth, I don't care. But keep them out of public places please. They are not children; they have no potential for a future in productive society. They will die at 10-13-15 years old and their bereft "mothers" will run out and buy a replacement.
For the record, the most unhinged, entitled "dog parent" I know is a man. He's my neighbor and he professes to love animals and then uses his dogs as an excuse for being a hostile, terrifying ahole. I feel bad for his dogs but I feel more bad for me who has to live right next to him.
I don't think the horrible dog parents issue is something unique to women. My best friend is a self-described "dog mom" and she and her dog are extremely kind and wonderful and she never takes her dog into the grocery store or restaurants (the occasional patio where they are allowed, but not inside), plus her dog is well-trained and well-behaved.
This is not a gendered problem. Crap dog owners are a universal scourge.
Anonymous wrote:Attention to single women in their 30s:
Dogs are not children. Having a dog does not make you a mother. Being obsessed with your fur baby is not giving maternal instincts, it's giving arrested development. I am not interested in women who make their dog the center of their universe.
I (M, 40) was dating a woman (35) who said that she and her German Shepherd are a "package deal" when we were getting serious and thinking about moving in together. I said she had to choose between me and the dog, and she chose the dog. Now she's late 30s and childless but with a giant, smelly canine.
Women, rethink your priorities if this sounds like you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP you're being harsh. The dog lives with her. The dog is part of her family. Not a child (and I agree that wayyyyyy too many dog people are overly liberal with their dogs) but asking someone to get rid of their pet is excessive.
If she were bringing the dog everywhere, to stores, restaurants, other people's homes, I'd agree with you. But in HER home? I mean that's where pets are *supposed* to stay.
How does it affect you personally if anyone views their dog as their fur baby? It does not
Oh except it does. It means she will bring it on planes, into restaurants, into the grocery store, and then enact high drama if anyone suggests that Priscilla shouldn't be sniffing the meat cast. It's her BABY after all. These people (mostly women IME) have become such unmanageable brats that we all just let them get away with it.
People can have all the fur babies they want AT HOME. Dress them up, feed them steak from the good china, let them lick your mouth, I don't care. But keep them out of public places please. They are not children; they have no potential for a future in productive society. They will die at 10-13-15 years old and their bereft "mothers" will run out and buy a replacement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the other hand I know a woman who rehomed her cats for a man and I think a lot less of her as a result. She's had them for years. He was not allergic. He just didn't like them.
I would too.
I mean, I would think poorly of her as well.