Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Duplicate: I have had more than one college admission counselor tell me straight "I throw the private school admission's application to the bottom of the pile. We all know a suburban public school with 500 or more students in a class, does not hold their kids' hands. The kids at the top are motivated to do the work, don't waste professors time, and put 100% of their effort in class. Private school kids on the other hand, whine that professors are too mean or pile on too much work, or have mommy/daddy call the dean's office."
I call BS on this. First of all if you’re going to make things up, at least get the correct nomenclature. Are you talking about a college admissions officer or counselor?
Admissions officers at colleges review application. College admissions counselors or consultants are advising applicants on how to apply to colleges, typically for a fee. Of course they’d be happy to serve both public and private students, that later making the bulk of their clientele.
The fact that you’re so confused about this distinction tells me you’re lying and likely don’t know any admissions officer or counselor.
Anonymous wrote:Duplicate: I have had more than one college admission counselor tell me straight "I throw the private school admission's application to the bottom of the pile. We all know a suburban public school with 500 or more students in a class, does not hold their kids' hands. The kids at the top are motivated to do the work, don't waste professors time, and put 100% of their effort in class. Private school kids on the other hand, whine that professors are too mean or pile on too much work, or have mommy/daddy call the dean's office."
Anonymous wrote:You guys, on the private school board the parents are all complaining that their kids would get into better colleges if they went to public school because of *their* inflated grading.
I have had more than one college admission counselor tell me straight "I throw the private school admission's application to the bottom of the pile. We all know a suburban public school with 500 or more students in a class, does not hold their kids' hands. The kids at the top are motivated to do the work, don't waste professors time, and put 100% of their effort in class. Private school kids on the other hand, whine that professors are too mean or pile on too much work, or have mommy/daddy call the dean's office."
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?
Agreed. As a true liberal, I can't stand MAGAs or progressive lunatics.Anonymous wrote:Most Republicans are moronic sheep following fascists without any substance in theor platform except God, taxcuts for billionaires, and cartw Blanche for co-opt power.
Most progressives are communists at heart, so of course they hate this.Anonymous wrote:Awww does it huwt yuw wittle feewings dat rich people get unfair advantages in every aspect of life in America. Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?
Are we pretending public schools don't inflate grades. I can name several public schools that allow for unlimited test retakes, unlimited extra-credit, and have very low standards for getting an "A" on their essays.
I've known students that have gone through Sidwell/STA/NCS. The work that would get a "B" there would easily get an "A" in most publics.
Not at our public. No retakes for tests, only limited assignments you are allowed to redo and no extra credit.
Same. Our public, outside of DMV btw, is pretty tough on grading. Especially in honors and AP classes. Kids have to work for their grades.
Anonymous wrote:It is also a matter of geographic chance.
Regardless of socio-economic status, an applicant from rural Iowa has a better chance of admission than any applicant from MoCo. Do you object to that?
Anonymous wrote:It is also a matter of geographic chance.
Regardless of socio-economic status, an applicant from rural Iowa has a better chance of admission than any applicant from MoCo. Do you object to that?