But what's worse is going to be when we inevitably have deaths because of people who are driving high. It's only a matter of time.
Anonymous wrote:The stench is bad enough and it's intrusive -- potheads (oh, sorry, "regular users") like to say, "It's legal now so it doesn't affect you if I smoke," but anything that's smoked--weed or not--is unavoidably intruding into other people's lungs and nostrils.
But what's worse is going to be when we inevitably have deaths because of people who are driving high. It's only a matter of time. Impaired driving is impaired driving, whether the source of impairment is alcohol, weed or any other substance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All smoking is bad. I'm really surprised more people aren't using edibles rather than smoking.
I'm am and was for legalization, as we need better control and tax dollars, but am surprised at the number of people in MD smoking / vaping cigarettes and weed.
Congratulations!
How many tax dollars will it take to deal with the problems legal marijuana causes?
Our schools are already overburdened and out of control, but causing brain damage to a generation is okay because we’ll have increased taxes - unless people decide they don’t want to live where overburdened and out of control schools are being filled with students who have brain damage.
Since there is no legal standard nor way to test for degree of impairment, it may not cost the government much more money to deal with an insolvable problem they don’t have the tools to address. Instead of taxpayers picking up the tab, it will be individual families who deal with the pain of injury and the tragedy of lost lives. But hey, since the government’s net revenue increases, I guess you have a win here - unless you or someone you love is hurt by someone driving while stoned.
Any time that government thinks it will benefit by capitalizing on its citizens weaknesses, I think we all end up losing.
To be fair, legalized weed in other places has been a success. This area did it wrong and also has more endemic poverty and other issues that I think is making it a cultural problem that doesn't seem to exist in the other jurisdictions I've been to with legalized marijuana.
Really?
I’d love to know what they’re legal limit for marijuana impairment while driving is and how they test for it.
What kind of marijuana are they selling that doesn’t harm developing brains?
Brains are fully mature for marijuana at 18. For criminal responsibility, it's 26.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All smoking is bad. I'm really surprised more people aren't using edibles rather than smoking.
I'm am and was for legalization, as we need better control and tax dollars, but am surprised at the number of people in MD smoking / vaping cigarettes and weed.
Congratulations!
How many tax dollars will it take to deal with the problems legal marijuana causes?
Our schools are already overburdened and out of control, but causing brain damage to a generation is okay because we’ll have increased taxes - unless people decide they don’t want to live where overburdened and out of control schools are being filled with students who have brain damage.
Since there is no legal standard nor way to test for degree of impairment, it may not cost the government much more money to deal with an insolvable problem they don’t have the tools to address. Instead of taxpayers picking up the tab, it will be individual families who deal with the pain of injury and the tragedy of lost lives. But hey, since the government’s net revenue increases, I guess you have a win here - unless you or someone you love is hurt by someone driving while stoned.
Any time that government thinks it will benefit by capitalizing on its citizens weaknesses, I think we all end up losing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All smoking is bad. I'm really surprised more people aren't using edibles rather than smoking.
I'm am and was for legalization, as we need better control and tax dollars, but am surprised at the number of people in MD smoking / vaping cigarettes and weed.
Congratulations!
How many tax dollars will it take to deal with the problems legal marijuana causes?
Our schools are already overburdened and out of control, but causing brain damage to a generation is okay because we’ll have increased taxes - unless people decide they don’t want to live where overburdened and out of control schools are being filled with students who have brain damage.
Since there is no legal standard nor way to test for degree of impairment, it may not cost the government much more money to deal with an insolvable problem they don’t have the tools to address. Instead of taxpayers picking up the tab, it will be individual families who deal with the pain of injury and the tragedy of lost lives. But hey, since the government’s net revenue increases, I guess you have a win here - unless you or someone you love is hurt by someone driving while stoned.
Any time that government thinks it will benefit by capitalizing on its citizens weaknesses, I think we all end up losing.
To be fair, legalized weed in other places has been a success. This area did it wrong and also has more endemic poverty and other issues that I think is making it a cultural problem that doesn't seem to exist in the other jurisdictions I've been to with legalized marijuana.
Really?
I’d love to know what they’re legal limit for marijuana impairment while driving is and how they test for it.
What kind of marijuana are they selling that doesn’t harm developing brains?
Brains are fully mature for marijuana at 18. For criminal responsibility, it's 26.
It's not the least bit challenging to drive while high on pot. You won't see pot smokers weaving from side to side, unable to stay in their lane. They are more likely to not take notice the light has turned green and it's time to move. But it's nothing at all like being drunk.Anonymous wrote:The stench is bad enough and it's intrusive -- potheads (oh, sorry, "regular users") like to say, "It's legal now so it doesn't affect you if I smoke," but anything that's smoked--weed or not--is unavoidably intruding into other people's lungs and nostrils.
But what's worse is going to be when we inevitably have deaths because of people who are driving high. It's only a matter of time. Impaired driving is impaired driving, whether the source of impairment is alcohol, weed or any other substance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All smoking is bad. I'm really surprised more people aren't using edibles rather than smoking.
I'm am and was for legalization, as we need better control and tax dollars, but am surprised at the number of people in MD smoking / vaping cigarettes and weed.
Congratulations!
How many tax dollars will it take to deal with the problems legal marijuana causes?
Our schools are already overburdened and out of control, but causing brain damage to a generation is okay because we’ll have increased taxes - unless people decide they don’t want to live where overburdened and out of control schools are being filled with students who have brain damage.
Since there is no legal standard nor way to test for degree of impairment, it may not cost the government much more money to deal with an insolvable problem they don’t have the tools to address. Instead of taxpayers picking up the tab, it will be individual families who deal with the pain of injury and the tragedy of lost lives. But hey, since the government’s net revenue increases, I guess you have a win here - unless you or someone you love is hurt by someone driving while stoned.
Any time that government thinks it will benefit by capitalizing on its citizens weaknesses, I think we all end up losing.
To be fair, legalized weed in other places has been a success. This area did it wrong and also has more endemic poverty and other issues that I think is making it a cultural problem that doesn't seem to exist in the other jurisdictions I've been to with legalized marijuana.
Really?
I’d love to know what they’re legal limit for marijuana impairment while driving is and how they test for it.
What kind of marijuana are they selling that doesn’t harm developing brains?
Anonymous wrote:Did you know it’s currently legal to smoke weed in an elevator in Maryland?
The prohibition in MD state law specifically states “carrying lighted tobacco products” as being prohibited in an elevator, “subject to a fine of $25.00”
But smoking a blunt in a elevator is 100% legal at the moment.
And I know this because the urchin sharing the elevator with me in Friendship Heights this evening while smoking a blunt fatter than my thumb, pointed the sign out to me very excitedly, while filling the elevator with smoke.
And he’s right. It’s totally legal.
Thanks, hopheads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All smoking is bad. I'm really surprised more people aren't using edibles rather than smoking.
I'm am and was for legalization, as we need better control and tax dollars, but am surprised at the number of people in MD smoking / vaping cigarettes and weed.
Congratulations!
How many tax dollars will it take to deal with the problems legal marijuana causes?
Our schools are already overburdened and out of control, but causing brain damage to a generation is okay because we’ll have increased taxes - unless people decide they don’t want to live where overburdened and out of control schools are being filled with students who have brain damage.
Since there is no legal standard nor way to test for degree of impairment, it may not cost the government much more money to deal with an insolvable problem they don’t have the tools to address. Instead of taxpayers picking up the tab, it will be individual families who deal with the pain of injury and the tragedy of lost lives. But hey, since the government’s net revenue increases, I guess you have a win here - unless you or someone you love is hurt by someone driving while stoned.
Any time that government thinks it will benefit by capitalizing on its citizens weaknesses, I think we all end up losing.
To be fair, legalized weed in other places has been a success. This area did it wrong and also has more endemic poverty and other issues that I think is making it a cultural problem that doesn't seem to exist in the other jurisdictions I've been to with legalized marijuana.
Anonymous wrote:We fought so hard to curb smoking in public areas and now we took several steps back that we will never come back from. And for anyone who voted to legalize and then has the nerve to complain about my perfume… suck it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every driver I have seen (and smelled) smoking weed while driving has had MD plates.
Anything else they had in common?![]()
Because we know exactly what dcum means when they say “Maryland drivers”.
Did you leave it out on purpose? Because you’re afraid to mention it?
I’m not the PP, but I assume you are alluding to race. “Maryland” does not mean one thing or the other to me. Most Maryland drivers (irrespective of race) drive like maniacs when they are in Virginia. Actually, I take that back. Most of the Maryland drivers that annoy me are white. I have no clue who is smoking weed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is illegal to smoke while driving, but it is impossible to enforce.
It is not impossible to make a dent in the problem. It is not impossible to make a dent in the problem of people smoking wherever they want in public in so many places.
Police used to cite and arrest people smoking in public and while driving. All the time. They still could.