Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the words of both the wise and unwise, “it is what it is.” Be sure to cast a wide net for your kid’s high school search.
This. Accept it.
What people really need to accept is that the number of high-scoring kids in DC is rising. The number of 7th graders scoring 5 on ELA rose from 140 in 2015, to 377 in 2019, to 434 in 2023. Meanwhile the number of seats at Walls has risen … from 149 to 158.
Just a decade ago, there used to be room at Walls for every kid scoring 5 on ELA in 7th grade. Now, no matter how they do admissions, most of those kids will be excluded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the words of both the wise and unwise, “it is what it is.” Be sure to cast a wide net for your kid’s high school search.
This. Accept it.
Anonymous wrote:In the words of both the wise and unwise, “it is what it is.” Be sure to cast a wide net for your kid’s high school search.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see why DCPS “should” do it. There is a big Asian lobby in NYC that advocates for test-based admissions. There is no similar lobby in DC. Both school systems have policies that reflect local priorities. Another example is, NYC doesn’t have any by-right neighborhood high schools. Are you saying DC should get rid of those too? Just to be more like NYC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe -- and I say this as someone with a kid already at Walls -- is that the school knows they need more rigor in the application process, but they still want wiggle room to choose who they want without getting sued. An essay is subjective, unlike a standardized test.
+1...Kid also at Walls. The Principal wanted a more holistic admissions system. Going by GPA or just a test eliminates a lot of kids that would do well given the opportunity. A family event, bad teacher, etc. can easily lead to a lower grade than normal. Can't please everyone but hopefully this will give more kids a chance.
It doesn't give more kids a chance -- the numbers are the same.
It just gives the Principal the power to play God with kids' educations.
Right — to me it would be more fair to do a test, but take the top X finishers by zoned school to make sure kids from across the city get a chance. Interview & essay still feels pretty subjective.
Sure. But if they did that, they'd have to keep track of test scores. You could foia it and argue with the choice, in either direction. Maybe you could even argue its legality, if zoned school proxied very closely for race. But this way, they don't even touch student test score data in the admissions process. The opaqueness of the process protects them.
I had visibility to the process as the school had exposed it accidentally. I will tell you from what I saw:
- If you had the minimum required GPA you were allowed to sit for the test. They used to also require a "4" on PARCC/the previous test for DCPS/DCPCS students.
- Top ~ 2x 9th grade enrollment from the test qualified to interview. If students had the same score from the test and that score was the cut-off, all students with that score were invited to interview.
- They interviewed (Black box on how they scored)
- From the interview score and test score, they created a ranked list and this created the list for who was accepted and who was put on the waitlist and the order they were on the waitlist
This process - although not perfect - was a bit of an equalizer.
If you had the minimum GPA set by walls (I think it was a 3.0 at the time) it removed the issue of your child having the hard grader. It also equalized for kids who may have struggled with executive functioning (which is a lot of middle school) but had the intelligence and things had not quite evened out yet.
Interesting. Thanks for posting. I had wondered if there was a component to spread acceptances among middle schools around the city (ie cutoff at deal might be higher).
NP who has knowledge of the process. There is no spread of acceptances among middle schools. Walls continues to be dominated by former Deal kids and Basis kids. Perhaps that will change over time but for now that has been the case.
More Basis kids than Hardy kids?
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see why DCPS “should” do it. There is a big Asian lobby in NYC that advocates for test-based admissions. There is no similar lobby in DC. Both school systems have policies that reflect local priorities. Another example is, NYC doesn’t have any by-right neighborhood high schools. Are you saying DC should get rid of those too? Just to be more like NYC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just moved to DC. Why isn't it just like NYC stuyvesant nd bronx: everybody who wants to take test does and top scores get in?
That is exactly what DCPS should do but doesn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Just moved to DC. Why isn't it just like NYC stuyvesant nd bronx: everybody who wants to take test does and top scores get in?
Anonymous wrote:Just moved to DC. Why isn't it just like NYC stuyvesant nd bronx: everybody who wants to take test does and top scores get in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe -- and I say this as someone with a kid already at Walls -- is that the school knows they need more rigor in the application process, but they still want wiggle room to choose who they want without getting sued. An essay is subjective, unlike a standardized test.
+1...Kid also at Walls. The Principal wanted a more holistic admissions system. Going by GPA or just a test eliminates a lot of kids that would do well given the opportunity. A family event, bad teacher, etc. can easily lead to a lower grade than normal. Can't please everyone but hopefully this will give more kids a chance.
It doesn't give more kids a chance -- the numbers are the same.
It just gives the Principal the power to play God with kids' educations.
Right — to me it would be more fair to do a test, but take the top X finishers by zoned school to make sure kids from across the city get a chance. Interview & essay still feels pretty subjective.
Sure. But if they did that, they'd have to keep track of test scores. You could foia it and argue with the choice, in either direction. Maybe you could even argue its legality, if zoned school proxied very closely for race. But this way, they don't even touch student test score data in the admissions process. The opaqueness of the process protects them.
I had visibility to the process as the school had exposed it accidentally. I will tell you from what I saw:
- If you had the minimum required GPA you were allowed to sit for the test. They used to also require a "4" on PARCC/the previous test for DCPS/DCPCS students.
- Top ~ 2x 9th grade enrollment from the test qualified to interview. If students had the same score from the test and that score was the cut-off, all students with that score were invited to interview.
- They interviewed (Black box on how they scored)
- From the interview score and test score, they created a ranked list and this created the list for who was accepted and who was put on the waitlist and the order they were on the waitlist
This process - although not perfect - was a bit of an equalizer.
If you had the minimum GPA set by walls (I think it was a 3.0 at the time) it removed the issue of your child having the hard grader. It also equalized for kids who may have struggled with executive functioning (which is a lot of middle school) but had the intelligence and things had not quite evened out yet.
Interesting. Thanks for posting. I had wondered if there was a component to spread acceptances among middle schools around the city (ie cutoff at deal might be higher).
NP who has knowledge of the process. There is no spread of acceptances among middle schools. Walls continues to be dominated by former Deal kids and Basis kids. Perhaps that will change over time but for now that has been the case.