Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s try this again: Extremely bright, extremely motivated, extremely achievement-oriented students choose a top school.
They are given tasks and assignments. If all of them do what they are asked to do, then all of them get As — as they should.
It really doesn’t make sense to continually post threads questioning why students who were picked because they are excellent students earning top grades continue to be excellent students earning top grades while they are in college. Education doesn’t require artificially creating a zero sum game. Education requires mastery.
If everyone is getting a 3.7 GPA or higher, it will make the vetting process by employers much harder.
This is NOT how it works in the real world. In my software engineering group of twenty, two people will get a rating of 4 (exceptional), three people will get a rating of 3 (outstanding), ten people will get a rating of two (successful), and five people will get a rating of 1 (below average). Why can't they do the same in college? Where I work, they will pick a recent grad with a 2.5 GPA but with AWS certification(s) over a grad with 4.0 GPA but no AWS certification(s).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DEI admits often submit lousy work but profs have to give them decent grades. To stay reasonably objective, this means the better work of non-DEI admits has to be graded at least as well or higher. The end result is almost everyone gets high grades. NYT won't tell you this but it's the obvious explanation.
Oh horse shit, you racist piece of excrement.
It's not racism. They explicitly lower standards to achieve whatever diversity they want to achieve. This is mathematically inevitable.
That didn't actually happen, moron. What bizarre fantasy life you lead.
Unless, as others point out, you mean "athletes" when you say "DEI?"
Or, white kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, when they're letting in morons like Jared Kushner, what do you expect?
Actually, they’re not. Kushner went to Harvard.
Let’s try this again: Extremely bright, extremely motivated, extremely achievement-oriented students choose a top school.
They are given tasks and assignments. If all of them do what they are asked to do, then all of them get As — as they should.
It really doesn’t make sense to continually post threads questioning why students who were picked because they are excellent students earning top grades continue to be excellent students earning top grades while they are in college. Education doesn’t require artificially creating a zero sum game. Education requires mastery.
This. They got straight As in high school. Why would you expect them to be getting Bs and Cs in college?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yale is a JOKE
But if you want to go into finance, it's awesome. Get your undergrad degree and then you're done with schooling for life. No need to do an MBA, it's a horrible ROI (like -$600K to your net worth). Wall Street is filled with guys who did 4 years of drinking at HYP and rose through the finance ranks.
That's who is benefitting from 80% As at Yale.
And yet some people still want to believe there is a meritocracy in the U.S.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DEI admits often submit lousy work but profs have to give them decent grades. To stay reasonably objective, this means the better work of non-DEI admits has to be graded at least as well or higher. The end result is almost everyone gets high grades. NYT won't tell you this but it's the obvious explanation.
Oh horse shit, you racist piece of excrement.
It's not racism. They explicitly lower standards to achieve whatever diversity they want to achieve. This is mathematically inevitable.
Anonymous wrote:If you have an Einstein and a Newton in a class of 2, why can't they both get As they deserve. Why must there always an F?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is how good ivy students are.
Born leaders.
Natural academic talent.
This explains mostly As.
Oh Christ.
These kids are top 1%, nationally and internationally.
What's the point of refining their pecking order to top 1%, top 10% top 25%, top 50%, bottom 75%, bottom 10%, bottom 1%?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yale is a JOKE
But if you want to go into finance, it's awesome. Get your undergrad degree and then you're done with schooling for life. No need to do an MBA, it's a horrible ROI (like -$600K to your net worth). Wall Street is filled with guys who did 4 years of drinking at HYP and rose through the finance ranks.
That's who is benefitting from 80% As at Yale.
Anonymous wrote:If you have an Einstein and a Newton in a class of 2, why can't they both get As they deserve. Why must there always an F?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, when they're letting in morons like Jared Kushner, what do you expect?
Actually, they’re not. Kushner went to Harvard.
Let’s try this again: Extremely bright, extremely motivated, extremely achievement-oriented students choose a top school.
They are given tasks and assignments. If all of them do what they are asked to do, then all of them get As — as they should.
It really doesn’t make sense to continually post threads questioning why students who were picked because they are excellent students earning top grades continue to be excellent students earning top grades while they are in college. Education doesn’t require artificially creating a zero sum game. Education requires mastery.
Then why have grades at all if we are just going to assume or pretend that people who got As in high school (not matter what the high school was teaching or how it was grading) are guaranteed to be stellar at level 4 college courses across the board as well?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, when they're letting in morons like Jared Kushner, what do you expect?
Actually, they’re not. Kushner went to Harvard.
Let’s try this again: Extremely bright, extremely motivated, extremely achievement-oriented students choose a top school.
They are given tasks and assignments. If all of them do what they are asked to do, then all of them get As — as they should.
It really doesn’t make sense to continually post threads questioning why students who were picked because they are excellent students earning top grades continue to be excellent students earning top grades while they are in college. Education doesn’t require artificially creating a zero sum game. Education requires mastery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is how good ivy students are.
Born leaders.
Natural academic talent.
This explains mostly As.
Oh Christ.