Anonymous wrote:
Where would you not submit at 1520 or a 1540. Some counselors are telling kids with these scores to go test optional to very highly selective schools.. the whole process, in terms of TO, has become a game. Wish college had to be either test required or test blind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, consensus seems to be to submit the score. I think it is a great score. Math is 770 and verbal is 730.
Do you know the meaning of consensus? There's five pages of differing views. But you should do what you want, ignore the consultant you're paying, and submit a score that's in the bottom fourth of enrolled students from last year.
It’s not in the bottom fourth of enrolled students if 32% didn’t submit any scores. Likely that means it is in the top 1/2 of enrolled students.
The 32% that didn’t submit were probably scoring well below 1500.
A 1500 is a drag on the average. Hard to see how that's a plus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And the fact that scores are so susceptible to prep makes it more clear you should submit; if the school assumes you prepped and still couldn't get a decent score, that's not a good look.
I don't get you logic. You think it's a better idea to submit a significantly below average score to Duke because you'd worry that, if you don't submit a score, Duke will assume that the student got a significantly below average score. Doesn't make much sense.
And I assume Duke would prefer to not have to put this mediocre score into its average.
Anonymous wrote:
And the fact that scores are so susceptible to prep makes it more clear you should submit; if the school assumes you prepped and still couldn't get a decent score, that's not a good look.
Anonymous wrote:DC scored 1500 on SAT. I think DC should submit to Duke but college counselor said score is below 1550 so DC should not admit. This seems crazy to me. Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Okay, consensus seems to be to submit the score. I think it is a great score. Math is 770 and verbal is 730.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, consensus seems to be to submit the score. I think it is a great score. Math is 770 and verbal is 730.
Do you know the meaning of consensus? There's five pages of differing views. But you should do what you want, ignore the consultant you're paying, and submit a score that's in the bottom fourth of enrolled students from last year.
It’s not in the bottom fourth of enrolled students if 32% didn’t submit any scores. Likely that means it is in the top 1/2 of enrolled students.
The 32% that didn’t submit were probably scoring well below 1500.
A 1500 is a drag on the average. Hard to see how that's a plus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, consensus seems to be to submit the score. I think it is a great score. Math is 770 and verbal is 730.
Do you know the meaning of consensus? There's five pages of differing views. But you should do what you want, ignore the consultant you're paying, and submit a score that's in the bottom fourth of enrolled students from last year.
Yes, these colleges want to get their average up. You're not helping them with a below average score.
This isn't rocket science. Just common sense.
It’s not in the bottom fourth of enrolled students if 32% didn’t submit any scores. Likely that means it is in the top 1/2 of enrolled students.
The 32% that didn’t submit were probably scoring well below 1500.
A 1500 is a drag on the average. Hard to see how that's a plus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:System is getting more and more fukced up
Yes, including rich people buying college counselors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, consensus seems to be to submit the score. I think it is a great score. Math is 770 and verbal is 730.
Do you know the meaning of consensus? There's five pages of differing views. But you should do what you want, ignore the consultant you're paying, and submit a score that's in the bottom fourth of enrolled students from last year.
It’s not in the bottom fourth of enrolled students if 32% didn’t submit any scores. Likely that means it is in the top 1/2 of enrolled students.
The 32% that didn’t submit were probably scoring well below 1500.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A relative of mine knows someone who works in Duke admissions. This person said TO iOS not for white kids with college educated parents- that it’s seen as a red flag not to submit in that demographic situation. If 1500 is over the 25th quartile, submit
Unless of course kid is a legacy or child of a big donor or someone famous. In which case, Duke loves TO as if allows them to take kids in this category that they would never take if the school had to report test scores for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, consensus seems to be to submit the score. I think it is a great score. Math is 770 and verbal is 730.
Do you know the meaning of consensus? There's five pages of differing views. But you should do what you want, ignore the consultant you're paying, and submit a score that's in the bottom fourth of enrolled students from last year.