Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Going from 2-3 isn't as hard as going from 1-2. Your older ones will be in school right? I think you can keep the nanny and the WFH job, until at some point you'd rather SAH.
I very much disagree with this. 3 kids means that you have at least a 4 year difference between first and third. Stages of life are very different for many years, different friends, different activities, different schools, etc. Two kids of similar ages can often be a pack… 3 kids… not so much.
I have a 10, 8 and 4.5 year old and the jump from 1 to 2 was much smaller than 2 to 3 in our case. Our oldest is into sleepovers and orchestra, our youngest just dropped his nap and is still in PK. In order to make everyone happy, we always have to divide and conquer. Had we only had a 10 and 8 year old we would not have changed much
Anonymous wrote:Going from 2-3 isn't as hard as going from 1-2. Your older ones will be in school right? I think you can keep the nanny and the WFH job, until at some point you'd rather SAH.
Anonymous wrote:Why don't you keep your job, and have your husband become the SAHD?
Anonymous wrote:I have three kids and no help and a full time job and I also volunteer in the community and find it all manageable. And honestly I have a next door neighbor with one five year old who regularly seems ready to pull her hair out and I kind of look at her like 'really?'
But the fact is that every person is different and what one person can handle and be happy doing is not what another person can handle and be happy doing.
I do not think cutting your income in half is going to help ANYTHING. It sounds like you shouldn't have a third, or like you should wait a few years so you have kids more spread out and less needy. There's no shame in that and you do your husband and your kids a service by knowing your limits and staying within them.